From Utopian Narratives to Financial Infrastructure: The 'Disenchantment' and Pivot of Crypto VC

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-30Last updated on 2026-03-30

Abstract

From Utopian Narratives to Financial Infrastructure: The Disenchantment and Pivot of Crypto VC The crypto industry, once championing "blockchain, not Bitcoin" and a broad Web3 vision, is now seeing venture capital flow overwhelmingly into pragmatic financial applications, particularly stablecoin payments. Following the decline of the Web3 and NFT boom in the early 2020s, investment has cooled for many sectors but surged for payment infrastructure. Key signals include Stripe's $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and Mastercard's $1.8 billion purchase of BVNK. Data from Architect Partners shows funding for crypto payment companies skyrocketed to $2.6 billion in 2025, exceeding the total of the previous three years combined. In contrast, funding for decentralized applications (DApps) and blockchain gaming has collapsed. The total private crypto funding reached $20.4 billion in 2025, still below the 2022 peak of $27.6 billion. Stablecoins, like USDT and USDC, are now seen as a breakthrough application, with their annual transaction volume soaring 72% to $33 trillion in 2025. Their core appeal is enabling efficient, real-time global value transfer, solving long-standing issues of cost and speed in cross-border payments. However, the industry faces significant challenges from established "gatekeepers" like Visa and Mastercard, which control terminal access. The piece also notes the declining market share of Binance and the emergence of new products like Franklin Templeton's toke...

Written by: Suvashree Ghosh, Matt Haldane

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

Not long ago, the crypto industry was chanting the slogan "blockchain, not Bitcoin," claiming that distributed ledger technology would go beyond financial applications and completely reshape the internet. However, recent financing trends indicate that in the real world, cash is still king.

Since the Web3 and NFT craze subsided in the early 2020s, investment enthusiasm in the crypto industry has noticeably cooled. But one niche has bucked the trend, attracting increasing venture capital—stablecoin payments.

Stripe's acquisition of Bridge for $1.1 billion last year was an early signal of traditional financial institutions beginning to lay out stablecoin payments. Since then, a batch of startups including ARQ, KAST, and RedotPay have successively secured new funding to build cross-border payment channels and stablecoin-based financial services. Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK for $1.8 billion last week further confirms the market's strong interest in this sector.

"Startups related to stablecoins are almost the hottest area for venture capital financing right now," said Rob Hadick, General Partner at Dragonfly Capital. "Stablecoins have broken away from the entire crypto industry to become one of the few truly breakthrough applications with widespread real-world adoption."

According to data from Architect Partners, which specializes in annual crypto financing reports, the total financing for crypto payment companies soared to $2.6 billion in 2025, exceeding the sum of the previous three years. Driven by Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK, this number is expected to continue climbing this year.

Crypto Payment Infrastructure Financing: 2025 company financing exceeded the sum of the previous three years

Meanwhile, overall private financing in the crypto industry increased from nearly $13 billion in 2024 to $20.4 billion in 2025, but still fell short of the 2022 peak of $27.6 billion.

Total Financing for Cryptocurrency Companies: The number of crypto financing deals rose last year but still hasn't reached the 2022 peak

Currently, the two areas with the most concentrated private funding are "Investment & Trading Infrastructure" and "Brokers & Exchanges," both financial application businesses. Payment infrastructure firmly holds third place. In stark contrast, the blockchain gaming sector, which was once at the core of the Web3 and NFT frenzy, saw its financing drop from $3.76 billion in 2022 (about 14% of total financing) to the point where it was no longer listed as a separate category in 2025.

In fact, various types of decentralized applications (Web3 functional layer) collectively raised $5.2 billion in 2022; in the 2025 report, only the consumer DApp category remained, with financing of just $864 million.

Financing by Cryptocurrency Subsector: Payments跻身 among the top three sub-sectors attracting financing in 2025

Stablecoins are building more robust financial infrastructure for blockchain. These tokens are typically pegged 1:1 to the US dollar, with their value tied to underlying assets. Driven by the Trump administration's pro-crypto policies, market enthusiasm for stablecoins reached unprecedented heights last year.

According to Artemis Analytics data, the total transaction volume of stablecoins surged 72% in 2025, reaching $33 trillion. The two largest stablecoins by size are currently Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC.

Circle's stock price recorded its largest-ever drop on Tuesday as investors assessed potential adjustments to U.S. stablecoin regulations and the impact of intensifying industry competition. But the core appeal of stablecoins remains clear: transferring funds as efficiently as possible.

Cross-border payments remain slow, costly, and capital-intensive. Despite years of fintech development, cross-border transfers still heavily rely on prefunded accounts in different jurisdictions.

"Stablecoins have completely changed this landscape," said Prajit Nanu, co-founder and CEO of cross-border payments company Nium. "They enable value to move globally in real-time without the same level of capital efficiency drain, which is why investors see them as the core infrastructure for the next generation of payments."

This industry still has powerful "gatekeepers." Large payment networks like Visa and Mastercard control access to payment terminals. Eric F. Risley, founder and managing partner of Architect Partners, wrote in the report that the channel distribution issue "is a major concern for every stablecoin and related payment company."

Binance Spot Trading Market Share Trend Chart

As of February this year, Binance's share of Bitcoin spot trading had fallen to 27% (this data varies slightly depending on the statistical method), and its share of all cryptocurrency trading fell from 52% to 32%. Its most profitable derivatives business also saw a significant decline, dropping to 34%.

Franklin Templeton partnered with Ondo Finance to launch an ETF tokenization product, tradable via crypto wallets 24/7, bypassing the broker accounts and limited trading hours that fund investments have relied on for decades.

Industry Voices

"The irony of holding this event in Las Vegas right now is just palpable," said Ben Johnson, Head of Client Solutions at Morningstar, stating bluntly that this industry has "completely crossed the line between investing and gambling, with no room for turning back."

ETFs, originally created to simplify investing, have now become a vehicle for the newest form of financial gambling in the U.S. Bloomberg Intelligence data shows that 36% of the 1,000 new funds launched last year were leveraged products or crypto-related funds.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main shift in focus for crypto venture capital investments according to the article?

AThe main shift is from utopian narratives like Web3 and NFTs towards financial infrastructure, particularly stablecoin payments and related services.

QWhich specific area within crypto has seen as a 'breakthrough application' with real-world adoption?

AStablecoins are identified as a breakthrough application that has gained significant real-world adoption, especially in payment infrastructure.

QHow much did funding for crypto payment companies reach in 2025, and how does it compare to previous years?

AFunding for crypto payment companies reached $2.6 billion in 2025, which exceeded the total of the previous three years combined.

QWhat major acquisition is mentioned as a signal of traditional financial institutions' interest in stablecoin payments?

AMastercard's acquisition of BVNK for $1.8 billion is highlighted as a key signal of traditional financial institutions' growing interest in stablecoin payments.

QWhat problem do stablecoins primarily solve in the global financial system, as per the article?

AStablecoins solve the problem of slow, costly, and capital-intensive cross-border payments by enabling real-time global value transfer with greater efficiency.

Related Reads

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News3m ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News3m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News21m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News21m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit32m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit32m ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片