From "On-Chain Applications" to "Financial Infrastructure": The Generational Evolution and Transformation of Perp DEX

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

Title: From "On-Chain Applications" to "Financial Infrastructure": The Generational Evolution of Perp DEX The 2025 period was a "great filtering era" for the derivatives sector. Surviving Perp DEX platforms have moved beyond being mere "low-cost versions" of CEXs by solving the core cost in finance: trust. With the adoption of full-chain abstraction, users in 2026 can perform seamless cross-chain transactions while retaining asset sovereignty, as funds are secured in smart contracts rather than held by intermediaries. On-chain derivatives now consistently account for over 25% of total trading volume, marking a fundamental shift in user behavior. Over 90% of Perp DEXs failed due to product homogeneity, reliance on subsidized "rented liquidity," and soaring customer acquisition costs. Merely forking existing code or offering token incentives proved unsustainable. Four successful models have emerged: 1. **Hyperliquid**: Achieved near-CEX performance by building its own L1 blockchain optimized for low-latency order books, attracting quantitative capital. 2. **Aster**: Leveraged the Binance ecosystem to offer enhanced capital efficiency, allowing users to earn yield on collateral (e.g., staking rewards) while trading. 3. **Lighter**: Built an app-specific ZK-Rollup to provide a verifiable, mathematically-proven trading infrastructure with anti-MEV properties, appealing to institutions. 4. **Decibel**: Unified high performance and full-chain composability on Aptos, achieving...

Author: Max.s

The year 2025 is often regarded as the "Great Filter Era" for the derivatives sector. As we stand before the current power landscape of Perp DEX, it is clear: the vast majority of once-prominent forked projects have faded into obscurity, while the surviving ones are reshaping the financial order with a全新的的姿态.

The survival of Perp DEX does not stem from being faster or cheaper than centralized exchanges (CEX), but from addressing the core cost in the financial system — trust. After several crises involving opaque清算 mechanisms in second-tier exchanges (the Double-Ten crash left all market makers in agony!), the market has reached a consensus: transparency is not an option but the foundational logic of infrastructure.

Early Perp DEXs were often seen as "low-end versions" of CEXs. However, with the普及 of full-chain abstraction (Chain Abstraction) technology, users in 2026 can achieve seamless cross-chain experiences. User assets no longer need to be custodied by intermediaries but are locked in smart contracts. This return of "asset sovereignty" is the底气 for Perp DEX to claim a share of the market from CEXs.

Currently, on-chain derivatives trading volume has stably captured over 25% of the total market share. This is not merely numerical growth but a migration in user behavior patterns. When清算 logic, funding rates, and order matching are recorded on an immutable ledger, Perp DEX has evolved from experimental DApps to essential infrastructure in the crypto market.

The demise of most Perp DEXs: mediocrity is the original sin. Behind the prosperity lies an极其残酷 elimination race. Over the past two years, more than 90% of Perp DEXs have fallen into silence. The "causes of death" for these failures are highly consistent: product homogeneity, reliance on subsidies for liquidity, and lack of technical depth.

During the "Points" frenzy, numerous projects attracted users with inflated liquidity mining rewards. However, once points were redeemed and airdrops distributed, these platforms fell into a death spiral of "liquidity draining to zero." This model reliant on rented liquidity will gradually disappear from professional markets starting in 2026.

Note: Rented liquidity refers to the model where DEXs incentivize users to provide capital to support trading depth by distributing points or token subsidies. Simply put, the protocol does not truly "own" this liquidity but temporarily rents users' funds by paying high "rent" (token or point rewards).

Another reason for the downfall of DEXs is the soaring customer acquisition cost. In the absence of a unique niche, merely tweaking a UI or forking GMX's code is no longer sufficient to survive in this highly competitive market. Projects without core advantages in order matching engines or strong ecosystem backing are essentially expensive liquidity mining pools, not real exchanges.

Four existing DEX models值得后来者们借鉴学习:

Hyperliquid Model: Vertical Integration and Technological Hegemony

On the list of surviving DEXs, Hyperliquid is an unavoidable monument. It proves that if general-purpose公链 cannot support high-frequency trading, the best solution is to build your own chain.

Hyperliquid attracts substantial quantitative capital because it addresses order book latency through L1底层 optimization. It no longer寄生 on Arbitrum or other Layer 2 solutions but has built a consensus mechanism specifically designed for derivatives. This "vertical integration" grants it matching performance close to CEXs while maintaining on-chain transparency.

More importantly, Hyperliquid has successfully built a "quant-friendly" ecosystem. When third-party market makers发现这里的 API latency is extremely low and slippage is controllable, endogenous liquidity begins to grow organically. This "performance barrier" constructed through hard technological strength makes it从容 in facing competition from generic DEXs lacking distinctive features.

Aster Model: Ecosystem Premium and Asset Management Layer

If Hyperliquid relies on hardcore technology, then Aster and its backing from the Binance ecosystem represent another survival logic:极致 resource efficiency and asset appreciation — essentially, having a strong "backer."

Aster is not just a trading venue; it更像是一个 "leveraged layer for yield-bearing assets." Through deep integration with the Binance ecosystem, it introduces collateral like asBNB or USDF, allowing users to earn Staking or Re-staking yields while holding positions. This optimization of capital efficiency is难以企及 for standalone DEXs.

For large capital users, funding cost is a core consideration. When users open a position on Aster, their margin continues to generate annualized yields. This logic of "liquidity assetization" turns Aster into a highly sticky financial gateway, not merely a speculative tool.

Lighter Model: ZK-Powered Verifiable Financial Infrastructure

The Lighter model represents the pinnacle of "financial infrastructure-ization." It does not seek to become a traffic入口 but provides institutions with a交易底层 offering mathematical certainty through its self-built application-specific ZK-Rollup (App-specific ZK-rollup).

Lighter's uniqueness lies in solving the "mathematical honesty" problem. It encodes order matching and清算 logic into "ZK circuits." This means that the matching and清算 of every trade no longer rely on the "reputation" of nodes but on verifiable mathematical proofs. This is extremely attractive to institutional investors who despise "black-box清算."

Furthermore, Lighter's ZK-Orderbook design inherently possesses anti-MEV properties, protecting the strategy privacy of high-frequency traders. This combination of "verifiability + privacy protection + extremely low latency" makes it a standard interface linking real-world assets (RWA) with on-chain derivatives, building a high compliance and technological moat.

Decibel Model: Unification of Extreme Performance and Full-Chain Composability

In the 2026 market, Decibel represents the third evolutionary model for the new generation of Perp DEXs: the乐高 combination of a "high-performance engine" and "composability." As a full-chain trading engine rising within the Aptos ecosystem, Decibel彻底终结了 the fate that "speed and decentralization cannot be兼得".

Decibel's core competitiveness lies in its deeply optimized Trading VM. Leveraging Aptos's Block-STM parallel execution architecture, it is advancing towards sub-20 millisecond (sub-20 ms) block times and the ability to process over 1 million orders per second. This makes on-chain order matching no longer an "illusion" but a reality capable of competing with top-tier CEXs.

Unlike traditional isolated DEXs, Decibel provides a highly programmable financial platform. It unifies spot trading (Spot), perpetual contracts (Perps), margin trading (Margin), and vaults (Vaults). This "full-stack" design means users can use a single cross-chain margin account to collateralize various assets like APT, USDC, BTC, ETH simultaneously, greatly释放了 capital efficiency.

Decibel's "X-Chain Accounts" technology further breaks down cross-chain barriers. Users can directly fund their accounts using wallets from Ethereum or Solana (like MetaMask or Phantom) without configuring complex cross-chain bridges. This "seamless access" capability, combined with 100% on-chain matching logic, positions Decibel to potentially become the new favorite for on-chain high-frequency traders and institutions in 2026.

New Directions Post-2026: Intent, AI, and Dynamic Pricing

From an industry practitioner's perspective, the future evolution of Perp DEX will focus on the following three dimensions:

Intent-Centric Trading Experience. Future users will no longer need to manually adjust funding rates or slippage but will express an intent. The system will find the optimal execution path across chains through solvers. This model will significantly lower the barrier for retail users to access complex derivatives.

The Explosion of AI Agents. With the maturation of on-chain automation tools, DEXs will built-in AI strategy engines. A significant portion of future open interest will be driven by AI. This means DEXs need to provide more powerful computing capabilities and lower data latency to accommodate the high-frequency博弈 of robots.

Evolution of Pricing Models. Current AMMs or simple order books remain fragile during extreme market conditions. We are seeing more projects introduce complex dynamic risk engines that automatically adjust system parameters in real-time through more scientific formulas:

实时调节系统参数。This automated adjustment based on real-time volatility and position deviation will make the system robustness of Perp DEX truly surpass that of traditional centralized institutions.

The second half for Perp DEX is a survival race about "efficiency." Projects that attempted to sustain themselves through mediocre subsidies have long turned to dust. The future winners will either possess impeccable technological foundations like Hyperliquid, have irreplicable ecosystem resources like Aster, or have found the perfect balance between performance limits and full-chain composability like Decibel.

In this field, there is only one reason to survive: Do you provide an execution efficiency that capital and strategies cannot refuse?

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报9m ago

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报9m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手13m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手13m ago

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手27m ago

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手27m ago

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

The article presents the vision of using AI not as a simple chatbot, but as a personalized operating system that creates compounding value. The author, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, details his system, built on open-source tools, which continuously structures all his inputs—meetings, books, emails—into a vast, interconnected "second brain." He describes concrete examples like "book mirroring," where a book's content is analyzed and mapped to his personal context, and automated meeting preparation that leverages accumulated knowledge. The core philosophy is "skillification": turning recurring tasks into reusable, self-improving "skills" that form the system's building blocks. A key insight is the "meta-skill" that creates new skills, ensuring continuous improvement. The architecture consists of a thin "harness" for routing, thick "skills" for specific tasks, and thick "data"—a 100,000-page knowledge base. The author argues the future belongs to individuals who build such personalized, compounding AI systems, not just those using centralized tools. He concludes by encouraging readers to start building their own systems using the open-sourced framework he provides.

marsbit34m ago

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

marsbit34m ago

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit47m ago

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'