From a "Preemptive Bet" Trade, Understanding the Hottest Web3 Trend of 2025: Prediction Markets

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

In early January 2025, a significant transaction on the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket drew widespread attention. An account invested approximately $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuelan President Maduro would leave office by January 31. The bet was placed hours before related geopolitical news became public, eventually yielding over $400,000 in profit as the event's perceived likelihood surged. This incident highlights the growing influence of prediction markets—a rapidly expanding Web3 sector in 2025. Prediction markets use financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information, allowing participants to trade on event outcomes. Prices reflect collective intelligence, often outperforming traditional polls, as seen during the 2024 U.S. election. Key platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi have attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, with Polymarket’s valuation reaching $8–9 billion after a strategic investment from ICE. The sector is projected to grow from $900 million in trading volume in 2024 to $40 billion in 2025, with users increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Unlike gambling, prediction markets use transparent, market-driven pricing and serve as data products for decision-making, attracting researchers and institutional players. Their growth is fueled by regulatory clarity from the CFTC, expanded event categories, and improved technology. However, risks remain, including potential insider trading and market manipulation. Participation is pro...

I. Introduction

In early January Beijing time, a piece of news circulated on overseas social platforms and within various crypto communities: the U.S. government had taken strong action regarding the situation in Venezuela, drawing significant attention from the international community. Almost simultaneously, a transaction record on a decentralized prediction platform quickly became a major topic of discussion in the market.

Data shows that over a span of just four days starting December 27, 2025, an account on the prediction market platform Polymarket accumulated an investment of approximately $32,537, consistently betting on the event that "Venezuelan President Maduro will step down before January 31." Notably, this account established a large position within a few hours before the related news was widely discussed externally.

At that time, the market's overall pricing for the probability of the related event occurring was not high, around 6%. As the situation evolved and official U.S. statements were released, the value of the account's holdings rapidly increased, ultimately realizing paper profits exceeding $400,000, with a return rate reaching over tenfold at one point.

Whether this trade involved insider information remains subject to further investigation by regulators and the platform. But it is sufficient to raise a question—what exactly is this frequently mentioned Polymarket? And why have prediction markets rapidly gained popularity in 2025?

This article will use this event to systematically introduce this rapidly expanding Web3 sector.

II. What is a Prediction Market? Why Can It "Aggregate Collective Wisdom"

A Prediction Market is essentially a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information.

In a prediction market, participants need to use real money to express their views on the outcome of a specific event through trading. As different judgments continuously compete in the market, the price gradually converges to a level that reflects the "collective judgment probability." This mechanism allows prediction markets, in certain scenarios, to come closer to the actual outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments.

This advantage was fully demonstrated during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Prediction market platforms, represented by Polymarket, provided probability judgments on election outcomes at several key junctures that were noticeably ahead of traditional polling agencies. Their predictive accuracy was subsequently validated after the final results were confirmed.

As credibility continues to accumulate, prediction markets are being cited more widely:

  • Mainstream financial media (e.g., Bloomberg) directly reference their odds data in reports;
  • Search engines and AI Q&A products (e.g., Perplexity) display prediction market results as reference information;
  • Prediction markets are gradually transitioning from an "internal tool within the crypto community" to a public source of information.

In terms of market size, industry growth is also significant. Multiple research institutions estimate:

  • The total trading volume of prediction markets in 2025 is expected to grow from approximately $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion;
  • The user base is projected to grow from about 4 million to 15 million people;

At the capital level, prediction markets have also received high recognition. By 2025, the two platforms Polymarket and Kalshi had attracted cumulative funding exceeding $3.15 billion, holding an absolute dominant position in the industry. In October 2025, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, announced a strategic investment in Polymarket, pushing its valuation into the $8-9 billion range. Simultaneously, Kalshi also completed several large funding rounds, with investors including multiple global leading institutions.

Amid these overlapping factors, prediction markets are widely regarded as one of the most representative Web3 sectors of 2025.

III. Prediction Markets ≠ Gambling: The Essential Differences Between the Two Mechanisms

As the popularity of prediction markets rises, a common controversy also emerges: are prediction markets just "gambling in a new shell"?

From an underlying mechanism perspective, the two have fundamental differences.

1. Different Price Formation Mechanisms

Prediction markets adopt a market-based pricing logic. Prices are formed through the博弈 (game/competition) between buyers and sellers in a public order book. All transaction data is auditable. The platform itself does not set probabilities nor bear outcome risks; it only collects transaction fees.

Gambling platforms, however, set odds internally. Their calculation logic is not transparent, and they ensure long-term profitability through the "house edge." The goal of adjusting odds is not to discover the true probability but to control the platform's risk.

2. Functional and Purpose Differences

The prices generated by prediction markets are essentially a data product that can be used externally. They can be applied in scenarios such as macro event judgment, policy expectation analysis, corporate risk management, and can even inversely influence media narratives and decision-making references.

Gambling behavior is primarily for entertainment consumption. Its odds do not possess spillover value nor serve an information discovery function.

3. Differences in Participant Structure

Liquidity in prediction markets comes from information-driven participants, including researchers, macro traders, data analysts, institutional users, etc. Their core goal is to arbitrage and discover prices using information asymmetry.

Liquidity in gambling markets mainly comes from ordinary consumers, who are more easily driven by emotions and preferences, not focusing on information accuracy.

Because of this, prediction markets are often seen as a form of "information liquidity market," rather than traditional entertainment gambling.

IV. Why Did Prediction Markets Explode in Popularity in 2025?

Prediction markets are not a new concept; their theoretical foundations can be traced back to the last century. However, achieving规模化 (scalable) growth truly relied on the maturation of multiple external conditions in 2025.

First, there was a key breakthrough in regulation. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gradually clarified the compliant positioning of prediction markets, defining them as falling under the category of commodity derivatives, not gambling behavior. This change allowed prediction markets to be distributed through broader channels. Post-compliance, the coverage of prediction markets in the U.S. even surpassed that of some traditional gambling businesses, reaching all 50 states.

Second, there was a restoration of institutional confidence and capital inflow. With clear regulatory boundaries, the financing path for prediction market platforms rapidly widened. Multiple large funding rounds provided support for product experience, liquidity, and risk control systems.

Third, there was an expansion of event categories. Evolving from macro-political events to include economic data, crypto industry events, and even sports events, making the application scenarios of prediction markets more diverse.

Finally, there was technological maturity. On-chain settlement, automated market making, and the application of AI tools in information analysis and trading assistance collectively lowered the barriers to participation and use.

These factors worked together, making 2025 the year prediction markets truly "broke out" into the mainstream.

V. Risks and Boundaries: A Rational View on Prediction Markets

It must be emphasized that prediction markets are not without controversy. The "preemptive positioning" case mentioned at the beginning of the article also reflects that insider information, manipulation prevention, and compliance enforcement remain issues requiring continuous improvement in this field.

It also needs to be clearly stated that Mainland China explicitly prohibits related prediction and disguised gambling activities. Ordinary users should not participate in any activities that do not comply with local laws and regulations.

However, from a research and industry observation perspective, prediction markets, as a tool for information aggregation and probability expression, still hold value worth attention and study in terms of systems, technology, and product design.

For the Web3 industry, it offers a new direction: not merely revolving around "asset speculation," but building data infrastructure around information, decision-making, and real-world events that can be used by real society. This, perhaps, is the real reason prediction markets are widely discussed in 2025.

Related Questions

QWhat is a prediction market and how does it aggregate collective intelligence?

AA prediction market is a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information. Participants use real money to trade on the outcome of an event, and through market博弈, the price converges to a level that reflects the 'collective judgment probability'. This allows prediction markets to often be closer to the true outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments in certain scenarios.

QWhy did prediction markets gain significant popularity in 2025?

APrediction markets gained popularity in 2025 due to multiple factors: key regulatory breakthroughs, such as the CFTC clarifying their legal status as commodity derivatives rather than gambling; restored institutional confidence and capital inflow; expansion of event categories beyond politics to include economic data and sports; and technological成熟, including on-chain settlement and AI tools lowering participation barriers.

QWhat are the fundamental differences between prediction markets and gambling?

APrediction markets and gambling differ in pricing mechanisms (market-driven vs. house-set odds), functionality (prediction markets produce data products for external use like risk management, while gambling is primarily entertainment), and participant structure (information-driven users like researchers vs. emotion-driven consumers). Prediction markets are seen as 'information liquidity markets', not entertainment gambling.

QWhat was the notable transaction involving Polymarket and Venezuela in early 2025, and why was it significant?

AIn early 2025, an account on Polymarket invested $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuela's President Maduro would step down by January 31, just before related news spread. The market probability was around 6% at the time, but the account's position grew to over $400,000 in paper gains as events unfolded. This transaction raised questions about insider information and highlighted prediction markets' ability to capture and monetize early information, though it also underscored risks like manipulation.

QHow has the scale and acceptance of prediction markets evolved by 2025?

ABy 2025, prediction markets saw substantial growth: total trading volume was projected to rise from about $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion, with user numbers increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, and mainstream adoption grew, with outlets like Bloomberg citing their data and AI tools like Perplexity using them as reference sources, moving from crypto社区 tools to public information providers.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit8h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit8h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit8h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit8h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit9h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit9h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit9h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片