From a "Preemptive Bet" Trade, Understanding the Hottest Web3 Trend of 2025: Prediction Markets

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

In early January 2025, a significant transaction on the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket drew widespread attention. An account invested approximately $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuelan President Maduro would leave office by January 31. The bet was placed hours before related geopolitical news became public, eventually yielding over $400,000 in profit as the event's perceived likelihood surged. This incident highlights the growing influence of prediction markets—a rapidly expanding Web3 sector in 2025. Prediction markets use financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information, allowing participants to trade on event outcomes. Prices reflect collective intelligence, often outperforming traditional polls, as seen during the 2024 U.S. election. Key platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi have attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, with Polymarket’s valuation reaching $8–9 billion after a strategic investment from ICE. The sector is projected to grow from $900 million in trading volume in 2024 to $40 billion in 2025, with users increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Unlike gambling, prediction markets use transparent, market-driven pricing and serve as data products for decision-making, attracting researchers and institutional players. Their growth is fueled by regulatory clarity from the CFTC, expanded event categories, and improved technology. However, risks remain, including potential insider trading and market manipulation. Participation is pro...

I. Introduction

In early January Beijing time, a piece of news circulated on overseas social platforms and within various crypto communities: the U.S. government had taken strong action regarding the situation in Venezuela, drawing significant attention from the international community. Almost simultaneously, a transaction record on a decentralized prediction platform quickly became a major topic of discussion in the market.

Data shows that over a span of just four days starting December 27, 2025, an account on the prediction market platform Polymarket accumulated an investment of approximately $32,537, consistently betting on the event that "Venezuelan President Maduro will step down before January 31." Notably, this account established a large position within a few hours before the related news was widely discussed externally.

At that time, the market's overall pricing for the probability of the related event occurring was not high, around 6%. As the situation evolved and official U.S. statements were released, the value of the account's holdings rapidly increased, ultimately realizing paper profits exceeding $400,000, with a return rate reaching over tenfold at one point.

Whether this trade involved insider information remains subject to further investigation by regulators and the platform. But it is sufficient to raise a question—what exactly is this frequently mentioned Polymarket? And why have prediction markets rapidly gained popularity in 2025?

This article will use this event to systematically introduce this rapidly expanding Web3 sector.

II. What is a Prediction Market? Why Can It "Aggregate Collective Wisdom"

A Prediction Market is essentially a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information.

In a prediction market, participants need to use real money to express their views on the outcome of a specific event through trading. As different judgments continuously compete in the market, the price gradually converges to a level that reflects the "collective judgment probability." This mechanism allows prediction markets, in certain scenarios, to come closer to the actual outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments.

This advantage was fully demonstrated during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Prediction market platforms, represented by Polymarket, provided probability judgments on election outcomes at several key junctures that were noticeably ahead of traditional polling agencies. Their predictive accuracy was subsequently validated after the final results were confirmed.

As credibility continues to accumulate, prediction markets are being cited more widely:

  • Mainstream financial media (e.g., Bloomberg) directly reference their odds data in reports;
  • Search engines and AI Q&A products (e.g., Perplexity) display prediction market results as reference information;
  • Prediction markets are gradually transitioning from an "internal tool within the crypto community" to a public source of information.

In terms of market size, industry growth is also significant. Multiple research institutions estimate:

  • The total trading volume of prediction markets in 2025 is expected to grow from approximately $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion;
  • The user base is projected to grow from about 4 million to 15 million people;

At the capital level, prediction markets have also received high recognition. By 2025, the two platforms Polymarket and Kalshi had attracted cumulative funding exceeding $3.15 billion, holding an absolute dominant position in the industry. In October 2025, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, announced a strategic investment in Polymarket, pushing its valuation into the $8-9 billion range. Simultaneously, Kalshi also completed several large funding rounds, with investors including multiple global leading institutions.

Amid these overlapping factors, prediction markets are widely regarded as one of the most representative Web3 sectors of 2025.

III. Prediction Markets ≠ Gambling: The Essential Differences Between the Two Mechanisms

As the popularity of prediction markets rises, a common controversy also emerges: are prediction markets just "gambling in a new shell"?

From an underlying mechanism perspective, the two have fundamental differences.

1. Different Price Formation Mechanisms

Prediction markets adopt a market-based pricing logic. Prices are formed through the博弈 (game/competition) between buyers and sellers in a public order book. All transaction data is auditable. The platform itself does not set probabilities nor bear outcome risks; it only collects transaction fees.

Gambling platforms, however, set odds internally. Their calculation logic is not transparent, and they ensure long-term profitability through the "house edge." The goal of adjusting odds is not to discover the true probability but to control the platform's risk.

2. Functional and Purpose Differences

The prices generated by prediction markets are essentially a data product that can be used externally. They can be applied in scenarios such as macro event judgment, policy expectation analysis, corporate risk management, and can even inversely influence media narratives and decision-making references.

Gambling behavior is primarily for entertainment consumption. Its odds do not possess spillover value nor serve an information discovery function.

3. Differences in Participant Structure

Liquidity in prediction markets comes from information-driven participants, including researchers, macro traders, data analysts, institutional users, etc. Their core goal is to arbitrage and discover prices using information asymmetry.

Liquidity in gambling markets mainly comes from ordinary consumers, who are more easily driven by emotions and preferences, not focusing on information accuracy.

Because of this, prediction markets are often seen as a form of "information liquidity market," rather than traditional entertainment gambling.

IV. Why Did Prediction Markets Explode in Popularity in 2025?

Prediction markets are not a new concept; their theoretical foundations can be traced back to the last century. However, achieving规模化 (scalable) growth truly relied on the maturation of multiple external conditions in 2025.

First, there was a key breakthrough in regulation. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gradually clarified the compliant positioning of prediction markets, defining them as falling under the category of commodity derivatives, not gambling behavior. This change allowed prediction markets to be distributed through broader channels. Post-compliance, the coverage of prediction markets in the U.S. even surpassed that of some traditional gambling businesses, reaching all 50 states.

Second, there was a restoration of institutional confidence and capital inflow. With clear regulatory boundaries, the financing path for prediction market platforms rapidly widened. Multiple large funding rounds provided support for product experience, liquidity, and risk control systems.

Third, there was an expansion of event categories. Evolving from macro-political events to include economic data, crypto industry events, and even sports events, making the application scenarios of prediction markets more diverse.

Finally, there was technological maturity. On-chain settlement, automated market making, and the application of AI tools in information analysis and trading assistance collectively lowered the barriers to participation and use.

These factors worked together, making 2025 the year prediction markets truly "broke out" into the mainstream.

V. Risks and Boundaries: A Rational View on Prediction Markets

It must be emphasized that prediction markets are not without controversy. The "preemptive positioning" case mentioned at the beginning of the article also reflects that insider information, manipulation prevention, and compliance enforcement remain issues requiring continuous improvement in this field.

It also needs to be clearly stated that Mainland China explicitly prohibits related prediction and disguised gambling activities. Ordinary users should not participate in any activities that do not comply with local laws and regulations.

However, from a research and industry observation perspective, prediction markets, as a tool for information aggregation and probability expression, still hold value worth attention and study in terms of systems, technology, and product design.

For the Web3 industry, it offers a new direction: not merely revolving around "asset speculation," but building data infrastructure around information, decision-making, and real-world events that can be used by real society. This, perhaps, is the real reason prediction markets are widely discussed in 2025.

Related Questions

QWhat is a prediction market and how does it aggregate collective intelligence?

AA prediction market is a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information. Participants use real money to trade on the outcome of an event, and through market博弈, the price converges to a level that reflects the 'collective judgment probability'. This allows prediction markets to often be closer to the true outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments in certain scenarios.

QWhy did prediction markets gain significant popularity in 2025?

APrediction markets gained popularity in 2025 due to multiple factors: key regulatory breakthroughs, such as the CFTC clarifying their legal status as commodity derivatives rather than gambling; restored institutional confidence and capital inflow; expansion of event categories beyond politics to include economic data and sports; and technological成熟, including on-chain settlement and AI tools lowering participation barriers.

QWhat are the fundamental differences between prediction markets and gambling?

APrediction markets and gambling differ in pricing mechanisms (market-driven vs. house-set odds), functionality (prediction markets produce data products for external use like risk management, while gambling is primarily entertainment), and participant structure (information-driven users like researchers vs. emotion-driven consumers). Prediction markets are seen as 'information liquidity markets', not entertainment gambling.

QWhat was the notable transaction involving Polymarket and Venezuela in early 2025, and why was it significant?

AIn early 2025, an account on Polymarket invested $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuela's President Maduro would step down by January 31, just before related news spread. The market probability was around 6% at the time, but the account's position grew to over $400,000 in paper gains as events unfolded. This transaction raised questions about insider information and highlighted prediction markets' ability to capture and monetize early information, though it also underscored risks like manipulation.

QHow has the scale and acceptance of prediction markets evolved by 2025?

ABy 2025, prediction markets saw substantial growth: total trading volume was projected to rise from about $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion, with user numbers increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, and mainstream adoption grew, with outlets like Bloomberg citing their data and AI tools like Perplexity using them as reference sources, moving from crypto社区 tools to public information providers.

Related Reads

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbit6m ago

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbit6m ago

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报19m ago

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报19m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手23m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手23m ago

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手36m ago

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手36m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片