Four (FORM) Explodes 26%: Sustainable Trend or Quick Pop?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

Four (FORM) has surged 26.33% in the last 24 hours, reaching a high of $0.3881, amid a broader market uptick. Trading at $0.3597, its market cap stands at $138.9 million with a 17% increase in trading volume. Technical indicators suggest bullish momentum: the MACD is above the signal line, Chaikin Money Flow indicates strong buying pressure, and Bull Bear Power shows moderate bullish dominance. However, the RSI at 80.75 signals extreme overbought conditions, raising the possibility of short-term consolidation. Key resistance lies at $0.3651, with support around $0.3530. A break below could see prices fall toward $0.34.

With the modest 2% uptick in the market, the crypto assets are pushed to the briefly formed green zone. As a result, the dominant assets, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), have gained over 4% each, seeking to climb higher. Among the altcoins, Four (FORM) has steadily rallied by over 26.33% in the last 24 hours.

This bullish encounter has triggered the price to mount to a high of $0.3881 from a low of $0.2531. Four have tested multiple crucial resistances to confirm the uptrend. The recent surge sees FORM trading at $0.3597, with its market cap at $138.9 million. In addition, the trading volume is up by 17% to $103.77 million.

The FORM/USDT trading pair’s 4-hour chart reports the bullish trajectory, and the price could climb to the resistance at $0.3651. Further pressure on the upside might invite the golden cross to take place, likely sending the price above $0.37. If the price chart turns red, the FORM might fall toward the support at around the $0.3530 range. Assuming the bearish correction strengthens, the death cross would emerge, and the potent bears may drive the price to $0.34 or even lower.

Charts Point to Growing Strength for FORM

FORM’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence line is positioned above the signal line. It is a clear sign of bullish control, and the overall structure supports further upside. Notably, as long as the MACD stays above, the trend is likely to stay intact.

Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow indicator value at 0.22 shows a sturdy buying pressure in the Four market. With noticeable capital flowing into the asset, active accumulation takes place. If CMF remains elevated, it can help sustain the positive trend.

The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 80.75 indicates that the asset is in extreme overbought territory. It also reflects a very strong bullish bias. However, FORM may be heavily overextended, increasing the chance of a short-term consolidation.

Moreover, Four’s Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of 0.1209 suggests moderate bullish dominance. The price is trading above its average level, reflecting a steady uptrend and likely the growing buying interest. It further supports a constructive short-term outlook.

Top Updated Crypto News

Can DOGE Shake Off Bearish Pressure, or Is a Deeper Slide Ahead?

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报19m ago

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报19m ago

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

Key political opposition to Kevin Warsh's nomination as Federal Reserve Chair has been removed after Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) withdrew his objection, clearing the way for a committee vote on April 29. Tillis had previously blocked the nomination due to a criminal investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell, which he viewed as a threat to Fed independence. The Justice Department has since dropped the investigation. Warsh, who has broad Republican support, is expected to be confirmed by the Senate in time for Powell’s term expiration on May 15. If confirmed, Warsh has signaled significant policy changes, including abolishing the "dot plot" of interest rate projections and reevaluating the Fed’s forward guidance framework. These changes could fundamentally alter the market’s pricing mechanisms for stocks, bonds, and currencies. Although the criminal case against Powell is closed, uncertainty remains as he retains his board seat until 2028. President Trump has not fully endorsed Powell, citing an ongoing review of Fed renovation spending. Warsh’s potential reforms target the communication tools developed post-2008, which have become foundational to global asset pricing.

marsbit43m ago

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

marsbit43m ago

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit58m ago

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit58m ago

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbit1h ago

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbit1h ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit2h ago

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures