Former New York Mayor Involved in Rug Pull Allegations: On-Chain Investigation into NYC Token

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams faces allegations of a "rug pull" following the launch of the NYC token. Shortly after its debut on January 13, the token’s value plummeted over 80% when the liquidity pool creator address (9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt) removed approximately 2.377 million USDC just 30 minutes post-launch. This caused the token’s market cap to crash from a high of $600 million to under $100 million. Beosin’s on-chain analysis traced the initial funding to a Mayan bridge and Kraken. After the crash, the same address began making small purchases of NYC tokens, but the price only recovered to around $0.133. The address still holds 1.332 million USDC, resulting in an estimated profit of $330,000. Adams denied personal profit or involvement in removing funds. However, the analysis confirms liquidity manipulation, with only about $1 million returned to liquidity after $2.37 million was withdrawn. This incident highlights the significant risks associated with celebrity-backed tokens.

Author: Beosin

On January 13-14, former New York City Mayor Eric Adams faced significant scrutiny after the token he launched, NYC, experienced a sharp price drop shortly after its release. The Beosin security team conducted a detailed on-chain analysis of the incident and shares the findings below:

Event Overview

On January 13, Beijing time, former New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced the launch of the NYC token (token contract address: Ho5fkxk9uqUuVN5kt7TUFacduWCpKPAuYkM9HD3KAXA2) on social media. However, just 30 minutes after the token went live, the address that created the liquidity pool, 9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt, began removing liquidity:

https://solscan.io/account/9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt

This address removed approximately 2,377,376 USDC, causing the price of the NYC token to plummet by over 80%, and its market capitalization to shrink from a peak of $600 million to less than $100 million.

https://ave.ai/token/Ho5fkxk9uqUuVN5kt7TUFacduWCpKPAuYkM9HD3KAXA2-solana

On January 15, Adams continued to promote the NYC token by retweeting related posts and issued a statement through his representative, Todd Shapiro, claiming that he did not profit from the NYC token and did not withdraw any funds from it. However, the community remains skeptical.

On-Chain Data Analysis

Using BeosinTrace to analyze the Solana address 9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt, we obtained the following results regarding its on-chain activities.

1. On-Chain Activity Overview

The address 9Ty4M obtained 1,000,001 USDC from the Mayan cross-chain bridge and a Kraken user address, then created the NYC-USDC liquidity pool. After removing liquidity at 6:43 Beijing time on January 13, which caused the price to crash, the address 9Ty4M began making small purchases of NYC tokens starting at 16:15 on the same day, continuing to the present.

Further tracing of the cross-chain funds reveals that they originated from the Arbitrum address 0xBc985b167C5F3801B19E2Dec7082c2fcbBF07e91. Continuing the trace, it was found that 90% of these funds were withdrawn from Kraken, while 10% came from an unknown multi-chain active trading address, 0x276fbb81c8a7567ad2412469a549bd4dc82cab65.

2. Transaction Data Analysis

According to BeosinTrace data statistics, the address 9Ty4M has purchased 2,301,250 and 1,566,926 NYC tokens via the addresses FWuiWEdkcR1NLPjozcEuErtGGDZG5kyPu3oszmnF8uni and H7Lnoh82SZghsXmoqffoCiFz7U3D1cwZ8ZPjRUMU7fc5, respectively, on Jupiter. However, the price of NYC has only recovered to 0.133-0.134, with a total market capitalization of approximately $130 million.

Currently, the address 9Ty4M still holds 1,332,243.85 USDC. Excluding any gains from NYC tokens, this address has profited by approximately $330,000 due to the limited liquidity of the NYC token.

Conclusion

This celebrity token launch has once again sparked significant controversy. Token issuance itself involves risks related to compliance, technology, and fund security. The removal of liquidity, which led to a sharp decline in the token's price, has negatively impacted investors and the market.

The on-chain analysis using BeosinTrace confirms the existence of "liquidity manipulation" behavior. After withdrawing $2.37 million in liquidity, the issuer continued to make purchases but only returned approximately $1 million, with the remaining $1.33 million still held in the issuer's address. Users should enhance their security awareness and avoid trading such high-risk, easily manipulated tokens. Beosin will continue to monitor the token's liquidity situation and the fund movements of related addresses to safeguard users' funds.

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit1h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手1h ago

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbit1h ago

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

marsbit1h ago

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

Liberland's congress has voted to remove Technology Secretary Dorian Stern Vukotić, following a resolution accusing him of attempting to hijack the Liberland.org domain, removing administrative multisig protections, blocking the president from voting, and launching unauthorized tokens. The incident serves as a case study in blockchain governance, highlighting risks that go beyond smart contracts to include control over domains, admin keys, and off-chain authority. For the crypto industry, it underscores the need to scrutinize decentralization claims against operational realities, where a small group can still compromise governance. The story reflects a broader market shift where infrastructure security and governance are becoming as critical as price action. Editorial framing should treat the development as a verified information signal about governance risks, avoiding overstatement of Liberland's legal status and leaving room for follow-up evidence.

bitcoinist2h ago

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

bitcoinist2h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit3h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Former New York Mayor Involved in Rug Pull Allegations: On-Chain Investigation into NYC Token

Abstract

Event Overview

On-Chain Data Analysis

Conclusion

Related Questions

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Liberland Fires Tech Secretary After Alleged Blockchain And Website Takeover Attempt

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

Trading