Fidelity Assesses the Limits of AI's Influence on the Crypto Market

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-20Last updated on 2026-08-20

Abstract

Fidelity Analysts Assess the Limits of AI's Impact on the Crypto Market Fidelity Digital Assets senior analyst Max Waddington notes that AI agents could become a new source of activity in the digital asset sector, from payments to trading and lending. However, the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. Fidelity's study of over 100,000 GitHub developers shows AI coding assistants increased commit counts by up to 180% and releases by 30%. These tools enable smaller teams to build blockchain applications faster, though critical financial software still requires manual code review. In the crypto industry itself, developer counts fell in 2026 amid lower prices, but commits per developer continued to rise. Waddington cautions that more applications don't guarantee success; user adoption, liquidity, compliance, and trust remain key. Autonomous AI agents, capable of payments, trading, liquidity provision, and lending, are emerging as another driver. Blockchains are suitable due to 24/7 operation and programmable settlements. According to Keyrock, AI agents had already conducted over 176 million transactions worth more than $73 million by May, predominantly using USDC. Infrastructure is developing, with Coinbase launching tools like the x402 protocol and 'Coinbase for Agents'. However, Fidelity expects agents to use multiple platforms (both public blockchains and traditional finance systems) based on cost and convenience. A surge in AI-driven transactions may not proportion...

AI agents could become a new source of activity for the digital asset sector—from payments to trading and lending. The benefits from this will be distributed unevenly among market participants, believes Max Waddington, Senior Analyst at Fidelity Digital Assets.

Developers Are Using AI More Frequently

Fidelity studied data from over 100,000 GitHub developers. The use of digital programming assistants increased the number of commits by up to 180% and the number of releases by 30%.

Source: Fidelity.

Waddington noted that such tools will allow small teams to build and launch blockchain applications faster. However, in financial and other critical software, code still requires manual review.

A similar trend was observed within the crypto industry itself. In 2026, against the backdrop of declining digital asset prices, both the number of developers and the volume of commits decreased, with the latter indicator falling more slowly. As a result, the average number of changes per developer continued to grow.

At the same time, an increase in the number of applications alone does not guarantee their success. Projects still need users, liquidity, regulatory compliance, and trust. According to Waddington, as development becomes cheaper, these factors will come to the forefront.

AI Agents Will Go On-Chain

Autonomous AI agents could become an additional driver of activity in the sector. They are capable of independently making payments, trading assets, providing liquidity, as well as issuing and taking loans.

Blockchains are suitable for such operations due to 24/7 operation, programmable settlements, and the ability to conduct microtransactions without human involvement.

This market is already taking shape. According to Keyrock, by May, AI agents had conducted over 176 million transactions worth more than $73 million. About 98.6% of the operations involved the USDC stablecoin.

Infrastructure for such scenarios is also developing. One of the most active players here is the exchange Coinbase, which previously launched the x402 protocol for automatic internet payments and later introduced Coinbase for Agents—a set of tools for trading and settlements using AI.

Nevertheless, Fidelity does not expect all agent operations to migrate to public blockchains. Banks, fintech companies, and traditional players are developing their own solutions, possessing an established customer base, infrastructure, and access to credit products.

In the view of analysts, AI agents will most likely work with multiple platforms simultaneously, choosing between them based on cost and convenience.

What are AI agent payments (agentic payments)?

Transaction Growth Does Not Guarantee Revenue Growth

Even if AI attracts millions of new operations to blockchains, this will not necessarily lead to a proportional increase in revenue for the networks themselves.

As an example, experts cited payments: their number can grow rapidly, but the fee per transaction remains low. Such transactions can also be batched, conducted off the main network, or moved to cheaper L2 solutions.

Operations with capital generate much more significant revenue. According to Fidelity's calculations, over the last 180 days, trading brought the base layer of Ethereum 49 times more revenue per dollar of volume than payments. Additional revenue is also created through MEV.

Source: Fidelity.

This is why analysts see greater potential in AI agents that will trade, lend, borrow, and provide liquidity. In the case of mass adoption of automatic payments, the main beneficiaries may be stablecoin issuers and infrastructure providers, rather than the native tokens of blockchains.

Recall that in March, specialists at Bernstein named digital assistants as the future of stablecoins. Later, Franklin Templeton noted that AI agents could become a driver of crypto payments.

end-content

Related Questions

QAccording to the Fidelity analysis mentioned in the article, what are the two main areas of crypto market activity that AI agents could significantly impact?

AAccording to the Fidelity analysis, AI agents could significantly impact two main areas: 1) Development of blockchain applications by increasing developer productivity, and 2) On-chain activity through autonomous operations like payments, trading, lending, and providing liquidity.

QWhat key finding about developer productivity using AI assistants did Fidelity's study of GitHub data reveal?

AThe study of over 100,000 GitHub developers revealed that the use of AI coding assistants increased the number of code commits by up to 180% and boosted the number of software releases by 30%.

QWhy does the article suggest that a surge in AI-driven transactions might not proportionally increase blockchain networks' revenue?

AThe article suggests this because many AI-driven activities, like payments, generate low fees per transaction. Furthermore, these transactions can be batched, processed off-chain, or moved to cheaper Layer-2 solutions, limiting revenue for the base layer. Revenue from capital-based activities like trading is much more significant.

QWhat is the primary type of cryptocurrency used by AI agents for their on-chain transactions, according to data from Keyrock cited in the article?

AAccording to data from Keyrock cited in the article, approximately 98.6% of transactions conducted by AI agents used the stablecoin USDC.

QWhat does the article identify as a major challenge for new blockchain projects, which will become even more critical as AI lowers development costs?

AThe article identifies that attracting users, ensuring liquidity, complying with regulatory requirements, and building trust are the major challenges for new projects. As AI makes development cheaper, these factors will become the primary focus for success, rather than just the ability to create an application.

Related Reads

Institutions Have Already Bought the Dip: Is Bitcoin at $70,000 the Start of a Bull Run or a Local Top?

Institutional Investors Piled into Bitcoin Ahead of Rally: Is $70K a New Bull Market Start or Local Top? Bitcoin surged past $70,000 following pro-crypto remarks from former U.S. President Donald Trump on August 20. However, institutional investors had been accumulating exposure in Q2 2026, even as the price fell. 13F filings reveal that while total Bitcoin ETF holdings declined, institutional holdings increased by 7.5%, reaching a record 44.2% share of ETF assets. Key institutional moves include Jane Street increasing its Bitcoin ETF and MicroStrategy (MSTR) exposure by over $800 million, BlackRock adding ~$290 million in Bitcoin-related holdings (MSTR, its own IBIT ETF, and ASST), and JPMorgan boosting its IBIT position by $85.6 million. UBS significantly increased its call option exposure on IBIT. Notably, Paul Tudor Jones's fund reversed a multi-quarter selling trend to add IBIT shares. Market opinions are divided post-rally. The "bear market over" camp includes F2Pool's co-founder declaring the bear market ended, Strive's CEO citing a favorable macro backdrop for Bitcoin, and Standard Chartered targeting $100,000 by year-end. Conversely, the "not yet bottomed" camp includes CZ stating the super cycle hasn't arrived, CryptoQuant analysts warning of elevated retail demand often preceding local tops, and analysis from VanEck and Glassnode suggesting on-chain data shows a prolonged "capitulation phase" is still unfolding, indicating current price strength may be a relief rally rather than a definitive trend reversal.

Odaily星球日报15m ago

Institutions Have Already Bought the Dip: Is Bitcoin at $70,000 the Start of a Bull Run or a Local Top?

Odaily星球日报15m ago

Viewpoint: A $4 Billion Buyback Can Fix Liquidity, But Not U.S. Fiscal Health

On August 19, the U.S. Treasury announced it would increase its maximum single-operation buyback size for long-term bonds from $2 billion to at least $4 billion, aiming to improve market liquidity. This move initially led to a pullback in long-term yields, such as the 30-year Treasury yield which had recently hit a 2007 high near 5.34%, sparking talk of potential "Treasury support." However, an opposing perspective argues this is merely a temporary fix. While buybacks can enhance trading conditions for older, less-liquid bonds, they do not address the underlying fiscal pressures. The Treasury's actions are a form of debt management, not monetary stimulus like QE; the funds used for buybacks ultimately come from cash balances or new borrowing. They do not reduce the government's overall financing needs. The core issue is growing fiscal supply. With the federal deficit reaching a record $432 billion in July 2026 and cumulative deficits already surpassing the prior fiscal year's total, the market faces a massive wave of new debt issuance. The recent surge in long-term yields may reflect a repricing of this persistent fiscal risk and the associated term premium, rather than just a liquidity shortage. Furthermore, demand-side challenges loom. Foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries have recently declined, and if official demand weakens, the market will rely more on price-sensitive private investors, potentially requiring higher yields to clear future auctions. In essence, the Treasury can use buybacks to soothe market "trading problems," but it cannot buy away the nation's "fiscal problem." The key factors to watch will be the appetite at long-term bond auctions, the trajectory of the fiscal deficit, and whether higher yields can sustainably attract buyers. Without improvement in these areas, the yield relief provided by the $4 billion buyback expansion is likely just a short-term buffer.

marsbit25m ago

Viewpoint: A $4 Billion Buyback Can Fix Liquidity, But Not U.S. Fiscal Health

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片