Everyone Hates Cryptocurrency, and We Only Have Ourselves to Blame

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-22Last updated on 2026-01-22

Abstract

Cryptocurrency faces a widespread credibility crisis, shifting from mainstream skepticism to outright厌恶. The author argues the industry has only itself to blame, using a crude metaphor of a failed orgy to illustrate the repeated, humiliating cycles of participation. Key reasons for the loss of trust and interest include: the aging demographic of crypto advocates; the prevalence of scams and irreversible financial losses; the rise of political meme coins (like TRUMP) as a sign of extraction over value; and more compelling narratives in AI and robotics. The author notes that crypto is no longer the most interesting or profitable game, with traditional markets outperforming. The culture is seen as toxic, degenerate, and driven by zero-sum PvP (player vs. player) dynamics where insiders hunt each other rather than building real value. Technical communities are disgusted by the lack of substantive progress beyond better wallets or cheaper gambling. Yield opportunities in DeFi have compressed, and trust in all entities—from founders to exchanges—is eroded. The piece concludes that the "lights are on, and the party is over," with crypto losing its narrative of optimistic innovation.

Author: katexbt.hl

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: If Evanss6's article was about finding a way out within a rational investment framework, then katexbt's long post is a "circle self-examination" that tears apart respectability. He starts with a spicy (even somewhat vulgar) metaphor, pointing directly at the real feelings of current crypto participants: awkward, ashamed, and repeating ineffective mistakes.

As we enter 2026, the crypto industry is facing an unprecedented credibility crisis. Kate points out that the outside world's sentiment towards cryptocurrency has shifted from "confrontation" to "aversion," while the circle has fallen into a "PVP" quagmire of mutual hunting. When AI, robotics, and space technology offer more real and interesting narratives, cryptocurrency is going further and further down a dead end with ATMs.

Main text as follows:

Tom and John were curious about a new thing called "group activities," so they organized a gathering with about a dozen friends, both men and women, but with more women.

It was their first time, so it was understandable that they were nervous. They decided to turn off the lights before starting—it would be easier, and there would be less performance anxiety.

When the time came, everyone took off their clothes and started.

Thump! Thump! Thump!

A faint cry came from the darkness.

"Is everyone okay?" Tom asked, turning on the light.

"It's fine! Let's continue!" John said.

The lights went out again. Thump! Thump! Thump!

The lights came on again.

John shouted: "Guys, can you please focus? This is already the second time I accidentally 'serviced' Tom!"

If you think the above story is just clickbait to trick you into reading further, you are wrong—this is exactly the real feeling most people have when participating in cryptocurrency:

  • Group activities = shiny new thing (cryptocurrency)
  • Turning off the lights = a slight sense of shame, but not enough to hinder the final decision
  • Repeated attempts expecting different results = insanity
  • Tom 'servicing' John = the same result, but with more steps, and when you end this journey, you feel more humiliated.

Over the past two years, negative sentiment (even mean hostility) towards cryptocurrency enthusiasts has been growing in almost all camps.

Yes, cryptocurrency has always been hated, but in the past, there were always supporters and staunch defenders who would say, "Wait and see, this time is different"—and indeed, every 4 years, these views were confirmed.

Each wave of new "normies" and non-believers was absorbed into Bitcoin or various other popular Ponzi schemes:

  • 2017: ICOs and shitcoins.
  • 2020: DeFi, smart contracts, NFTs, Ethereum/BSC/L1 trading, and of course LUNA and Celsius.
  • 2023/24: Memecoins, Trenches.

Just by looking at the format and length of these words above, you can feel that most of the substantive action stayed in 2020. And this is exactly why people don't like us now.

Just think about it, here are a few reasons why people are hostile to cryptocurrency, in no particular order:

1. It's an Old Man's Game

Those who started promoting Bitcoin in their early 20s are now in the "certified uncle" stage. As a 40-year-old man, pasting contract addresses (CA) in group chats full of kids with some sense of superiority is really not heroic, even if you are indeed harvesting them to make money.

The younger generation seems to care more about physical collectibles, vibes, nostalgia, and memories. They want to yearn, not earn.

2. Crypto's Bad Reputation

Even if they want to make money, the reasons I list below make it seem almost impossible: Cryptocurrency is not fun, even if you are tech-savvy, a momentary lapse of reason—a click, an authorization signature—can cause irreparable permanent damage to your net worth.

  • You got a little drunk and clicked on an airdrop ad on X, and your wallet was drained?
  • You downloaded a pirated PS 6 months ago and forgot to delete it, a keylogger stole your private key?
  • Tough luck, no refunds.

Even if you keep your device clean, you might get caught up in the Ledger data leak or Celsius's real-name information exposure, and your identity will forever be associated with "internet ghost coin gambling." Not to mention if you show off a little wealth, you might face kidnapping, torture, or just be disliked by those around you.

Caption: Look, I'm having so much fun here (sarcasm)

3. Crypto's Bad Reputation - The Presidential ATM

With the introduction of tokens like TRUMP, MELANIA, and WLF, the Overton window shifted. The funny thing is, these coins all fell; they became the death knell for the previous "AI + Solana" frenzy.

Caption: Thanks, Obama (meme)

The issue is not whether this marks the top, but who did it and what the consequences are. Considering that the TRUMP coin was launched two days before the official inauguration, and other tokens were made by people "associated but technically not him," good luck seeking a refund.

Even before this scene, "Extraction" was the name of the game. We often say that cryptocurrency is a zero-sum game—for me to make $50, there must be one person or a group of people losing a total of $50. Many people were burned in 2021/22, becoming exit liquidity for those savvy "on-chain predators," and then they came back in 2023 with a vengeance—starting to participate in the predation themselves.

This is the problem: There is no pure interest here anymore.

Now there are no new speculators willing to be "predated" because in 2021/2022, participating in this "party" was at least positive expected value (+EV), fun, and vibrant. But now, people have better places to go.

4. Crypto Is No Longer the Most Interesting Game

  • AI
  • Vibe Coding (building apps alone in hours, not leading teams for weeks)
  • Robotics

All these areas are much more interesting than cryptocurrency because we can clearly see the impact they bring. The stories in these areas are not just "you'll get rich because it goes up." If there is a bubble now, it's in AI, not crypto.

This means opportunities are elsewhere, not in cryptocurrency.

As "a friend on my TG" said, his origin story (and many others):

The logic here is: if you enter with pure intentions, trying to create value and tokenize, you will eventually encounter a truckload of fools complaining about the price (and the price is designed to fall because tokenomics mainly benefits the team).

So people simply choose the straightforward way—they design systems (presented as various flavors of Ponzi schemes depending on skill level) with the initial intention of taking money. This way is more direct and efficient.

5. Price Is the Best Advertisement, but the Ads Now Are Terrible

So far, these advertisements have performed very poorly. Since Solana (SOL) went up 10x and Hyperliquid (HYPE) went up 5x, the returns in the crypto market have been微不足道 compared to what you see in the stock market.

The legendary crypto trader GCR once lamented:

"When the macro environment is in risk-on mode, it is wise to bet on the fastest horse, and currently that horse is cryptocurrency." (Something like that, I can't find the screenshot).

But guess what? The Dow Jones hit a new all-time high, the Nikkei also hit a new all-time high, gold and silver—you guessed it, also hit new all-time highs. And cryptocurrency? Stagnant. This is different from anything we've seen before, and this is exactly what annoys many people.

The price of assets (their valuation) is also completely disconnected from the function of these assets. Does the "world computer" really need a $360 billion market cap? Is it really worth twice as much as Intel?

That's a company that has been making processors for nearly half a century. If Ethereum (ETH) were $400, would network security still be guaranteed? Most likely yes.

6. Normies Are Disgusted by Our "Culture"

One thing different from 2021 today is that no one is drinking the "Kool-Aid" anymore, no one believes that you can become rich, famous, or successful just by being in the crypto industry. If that were true, you would see more success stories, not people constantly losing money or even encountering violence (like having fingers chopped off).

On the contrary, when a person with social capital sees a crypto project or someone mentions it to them, they might play along for a while, probably a few hours, because in this day and age, entering and exiting with a bag of money only takes that long. On this website (X/Twitter), everything is pseudonymous or anonymous, which means the potential consequences are also minimal—almost non-existent.

We've been trying this "creator coin" garbage for almost three years now, and aside from a very few barely working cases, almost every version has become "Extraction Central." In economics, we call this "Adverse Selection":

  1. Real creators don't want a group of disgusting,卑微 like beetles speculators bothering them all day.
  2. Scammers will indulge in it for two hours, make money, and then laugh at how degenerate we are.
  3. Most high-net-worth individuals (HNWI) simply don't care, because the disadvantages far outweigh the benefits.
  4. Gamblers (indeed very degenerate) will gamble themselves into bankruptcy and then complain in their information cocoons.

Wow, the Zora creator economy powered by Base and Solana capital markets is so cool, I love it so much, I want to get all my friends to join as soon as possible! (Note: Author's sarcasm here)

7. Tech People Are Also Disgusted by This Culture—Because the Crypto Industry Has No Substance

Five years ago, I would go to Hacker News to see how anti-crypto they were, or see how sour the comments on Gematsu were, but in the end, those people often became the highest bag holders. But now, I feel like they don't even actively express hatred as much as before—they are just彻底 disgusted and hope it all ends quickly.

They want it to end because, whether founders or thinkers, no matter what their stance on cryptocurrency is, the only significant use cases they see are "zero-sum money games" and "scams." Except for a very few life-changing airdrops (like Jito, Hyperliquid, or some already dead infrastructure projects), the vast majority of so-called "opportunities" are landmines.

From my perspective:

  • Although technically feasible, Web3 wallet connection (Wallet connect) has not been implemented in any well-known Web2 applications.
  • The real-life adoption of stablecoins is actually not that amazing; instead, as mentioned before, it increases government regulation and operational security (Opsec) risks.
  • For savvy investors, other markets have better returns.
  • Valuations for new projects are crazy across the board, no matter the price, and we now have over 8 years of strong data to confirm this (underperformance).
  • Even projects like Privy, which have been called the biggest winners in the past 4 years due to their broad appeal, have not driven any applications that can be called "success stories" for the crypto industry.

If, as a collective, you were given a full 10 years to build something, and the best you could come up with is "a better wallet," "a better blockchain explorer," or "a simpler way to gamble with lower fees"—can you blame people for thinking cryptocurrency has little value and is a failed experiment?

8. Yield Compression

Since I entered the industry in 2020, the thing that attracted me and kept me investing money has been DeFi protocols. The return on USD (in the traditional field) is at most 3-4%, and banks require all kinds of KYC/AML (anti-money laundering) proof for basic operations. In countries like Japan or China, it's even hard to get such returns.

DeFi offered a new way to earn yield, which was more or less (usually less, lol) safe, especially considering potential airdrops, the returns could be very substantial. But as the African-American community often says, the hit rate of "hitting a lick in the bando" has dropped significantly.

This is not because of AI advancement or people suddenly becoming smarter, but because of the imbalance in the ratio: new entrants willing to endure this crap and its risks / seasoned players who know the rules of the game ...... this ratio is dropping sharply.

If you want to know more, you can翻翻 @rami_poker's past随笔, it's all been written about.

I also dare to bet that Pendle has exacerbated this situation to some extent. Although it is very genius, the innovation of YT (yield tokens) opened the door for unethical teams to accelerate this speculative fraud at the expense of those who think they are smart but are actually mediocre (like me, lol).

The compression of yield corresponds to my previous point: a疯狂轮动的 hot money ball is not so hot anymore, now it looks like leftovers. From personal experience, only 3 people in my circle are DeFi fans and really care about it:

  1. One who always hates it and wants to quit because he feels too old to play these烂事了.
  2. Another from Singapore, who cares a lot about it, but he is only 20 and can pivot to anything at any time.
  3. The last one is me—I have pivoted to writing on X for a living because I don't have time to do due diligence on whether someone will directly hard rug, steal my yield, or just waste my time while juggling work, travel, and managing life.

9. We Don't Trust Anyone Anymore

All the "metas" seem to be accelerating, and any particular narrative faces greater resistance to spread and diffusion. We also no longer trust companies or centralized exchanges (CEXes)......

  • We don't trust CZ and Binance.
  • We don't trust Coinbase, Brian, or the Base/Zora folks.
  • We absolutely do not trust Ledger.
  • We especially don't trust those "tourist" founders—if you've been in the circle for ten years before coming out to issue a token, what were you doing all these ten years?

10. Infighting Within the Circle

Since the end of 2022, the term "PVP market" has become ubiquitous. It used to refer to the game of on-chain metrics, but now, this "hatred" has spread inside cryptocurrency.

  • Posthumous whipping on Crypto Yelp: Everyone is tearing each other apart on social platforms. Although the出发点 is good, it's already too late.
  • Rising by "spitting": Many accounts have gained followers quickly recently, with the only "value output" being posting two lines of witty remarks or screenshots mocking other CT (Crypto Twitter) big Vs or projects.
  • Misogynistic and unpleasant community atmosphere: A group of people who think they are cool搞准入 in their respective "cesspools" (NFT or token communities). When the community market cap drops 90% a year later, they start疯狂 biting each other.

Imagine how disgusting it will be when you have to tell your descendants that your achievement in your 20s and 30s was this crap.

Whether love or hate, it was this "ignorant optimism" that once supported the prices of our altcoins. But now, the lights are on, and the party should be over.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why has the general public's attitude towards cryptocurrency shifted from opposition to disgust?

AThe public's attitude has shifted because the crypto space is now seen as an 'extraction game' with no genuine interest, filled with scams and zero-sum PVP dynamics, while other fields like AI and robotics offer more tangible and exciting narratives.

QWhat does the author mean by the metaphor of 'turning off the lights' in the context of cryptocurrency participation?

AThe metaphor of 'turning off the lights' represents the slight sense of embarrassment or shame associated with participating in cryptocurrency, which initially makes it easier to engage but ultimately leads to repeated failures and humiliation.

QHow does the author explain the phenomenon of 'yield compression' in DeFi and its impact on new entrants?

AYield compression refers to the declining returns in DeFi due to an imbalance between the number of new entrants willing to tolerate risks and the number of experienced players who understand the game, making it less attractive and more like 'scraps' rather than lucrative opportunities.

QWhat is the author's view on why 'creator coins' and similar crypto initiatives have largely failed?

AThe author attributes the failure of creator coins to 'adverse selection,' where genuine creators avoid the space due to annoying speculators, while scammers exploit it briefly for profit, and high-net-worth individuals ignore it due to the high risks and low benefits.

QWhy does the author believe that cryptocurrency is no longer the 'most interesting game' compared to other technologies?

AThe author believes AI, vibe coding, and robotics are more interesting because they offer clear, tangible impacts and narratives beyond mere financial speculation, whereas crypto is stuck in a loop of zero-sum extraction and lacks substantive innovation.

Related Reads

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

**Summary: Why SOL is Positioned for Growth at This Level** The article argues that SOL is poised for an upward move from its current price point, citing several key factors. Primarily, SOL has just broken out of a 4-month consolidation phase. This breakout signals a return of risk appetite to the broader crypto market, as SOL is seen as a key indicator of overall crypto health. The token's ownership has reportedly shifted from short-term traders and tourists to long-term accumulators, leading to low volume. Any meaningful increase in trading activity could thus trigger significant upward momentum. Fundamental strengths include strong institutional adoption, integration with DeFi and RWAs (Real-World Assets), and the potential benefits from the Clarity Act. Despite its high volatility—having dropped 70% from its all-time high but still up 12x from its bear market low—SOL is highlighted as one of the few tokens from the last cycle to reach new highs. It boasts a robust ecosystem of applications, users, and protocols. Future catalysts include the expected influx of AI developers following the Miami Accelerate conference, which focused on AI on Solana. Furthermore, Solana is positioned as the premier chain for memecoin activity, a trend expected to continue and drive network usage and fees. The article concludes that recent price action reflects a healthy transfer to long-term holders, setting the stage for growth.

marsbit35m ago

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

marsbit35m ago

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

This article details a recent surge in replicating pre-Bitcoin Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols, specifically focusing on Hal Finney's 2004 RPOW (Reusable Proofs of Work). Within five days in May 2026, multiple independent builders in the Bitcoin/cypherpunk community launched projects inspired by this early electronic cash proposal. The initiative began with Fred Krueger's `rpow2.com`, a centralized but auditable system that replaced RPOW's original IBM 4758 hardware with Ed25519 signatures. Initially a faithful replica, it later adopted Bitcoin-like features (21M supply cap, difficulty adjustment) and a controversial 5.24% founder allocation. This sparked rapid forks, including `rpow4.com` which incorporated full Bitcoin parameters, a prediction market (`rpowmarket.com`), and a DEX (`rpow2swap.com`). Concurrently, Mike In Space created a prototype of Wei Dai's 1998 b-money proposal (`b-money.replit.app`), pushing the historical exploration even further back. The article contrasts these centralized, server-dependent experiments with Bitcoin's core innovation of decentralized, trustless consensus. It also highlights a parallel development: the `HASH` project on Ethereum, which uses smart contract hooks to enable a purely fair-launch, browser-mineable PoW token with 0% allocations to team or VCs. The collective activity is framed as a meme-driven, educational exploration of cypherpunk history rather than a serious financial movement, with all projects heavily disclaiming any investment value.

marsbit39m ago

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

marsbit39m ago

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbit1h ago

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbit1h ago

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

Sun Yuchen, known for his controversial stunts like a $30 million lunch with Warren Buffett (canceled due to a kidney stone) and eating a $6.2 million duct-taped banana, is often overshadowed by a significant fact: his decade-long track record of spotting major investment trends. In 2016, he famously advised young people to invest in Bitcoin, Nvidia, Tesla, and Tencent instead of buying property. A hypothetical $20,000 investment in Nvidia and Tesla from that list would now be worth over 50 million RMB. His latest major call was on November 6, 2025, predicting a "50x storage opportunity" tied to the AI boom, which materialized with Sandisk's stock surging nearly 50-fold by 2026. Looking ahead, Sun now focuses on the next frontier: Physical AI. He identifies four key areas: 1. **Embodied AI/Robotics**: He sees this reaching its "iPhone moment," with companies like UBTech and Galaxy General leading in commercialization. 2. **Drones**: Viewed as the first commercially viable form of Physical AI, revolutionizing sectors from warfare (e.g., AeroVironment's Switchblade) to logistics. 3. **Spatial Computing**: Beyond VR, it's about AI understanding physical space, a foundational technology for robotics and autonomous systems, exemplified by Apple's Vision Pro. 4. **Space Exploration**: After a 2025 suborbital flight with Blue Origin, Sun advocates for space as the ultimate frontier, discussing blockchain's potential role in space asset management and data transactions. His investment philosophy involves betting on entire, inevitable trends rather than single companies. For robotics, he sees Tesla (the body/manufacturer) and Nvidia (the brain/AI platform) as complementary plays. In defense drones, he highlights companies making tanks obsolete (AeroVironment) and those augmenting fighter jets (Kratos). For space, he participated in Blue Origin's flight and anticipates SpaceX's potential IPO to redefine the sector's valuation. Sun Yuchen's vision frames the next two decades not as a revolution in information flow (like the internet), but in the fundamental operation of the physical world through AI-powered robots, autonomous systems, and spatial intelligence, ultimately extending human and AI activity into space. While many still focus on conventional assets, he continues to look toward the next technological horizon.

marsbit2h ago

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片