European Banking Giants Unite: Can the Euro Stablecoin Reshape the Global Crypto Landscape?

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

A consortium of 12 major European banks, including BNP Paribas, ING, and UniCredit, has announced the launch of a euro-pegged stablecoin, Qivalis, in late 2026. This initiative aims to provide a regulated European alternative to dominant dollar-based stablecoins like USDT and USDC, which currently serve as the de facto monetary standard in the crypto ecosystem. The Qivalis stablecoin will be fully backed by a reserve comprising at least 40% in bank deposits and the remainder in high-rated short-term eurozone government bonds, ensuring high liquidity and reduced risk. The move represents a strategic effort by European institutions to secure a role in the emerging on-chain financial infrastructure, where stablecoins are increasingly functioning as settlement units, payment networks, and sovereign currency representations. Rather than directly challenging dollar stablecoins' liquidity dominance, the project seeks to ensure the euro’s presence in the digital financial landscape, preventing a single-currency monopoly in future on-chain trade and capital flows. This development signals a broader shift: traditional finance is actively entering the digital asset space to redefine its role in an increasingly tokenized economy.

For a long time, the "on-chain dollar" has been the de facto monetary standard in the crypto world.

Whether it's USDT issued by Tether or USDC launched by Circle, USD stablecoins not only dominate market liquidity but are also increasingly serving as mediums for cross-border payments, units of account for on-chain assets, and settlement tools.

The question is becoming clear: as more cross-border transactions, trade settlements, and capital flows occur on-chain in the future, who will define the on-chain "monetary standard"?

On March 3, the Qivalis alliance, composed of 12 European banks, announced that it will launch a 1:1 euro-pegged stablecoin in the second half of 2026.

This is not just a product launch; it is a formal response from the European banking system to the on-chain financial structure.

12 Major Banks Join Forces

This move by the Qivalis alliance is a key step for Europe to reclaim its "digital sovereignty." Qivalis CEO Jan Sell explicitly stated that the project aims to provide the EU with a regulated "domestic alternative" to counter the strong influence of USD stablecoins.

Alliance members include: CaixaBank, BNP Paribas, ING, UniCredit, BBVA, Danske Bank, DZ Bank, SEB, KBC, Raiffeisen Bank International, DekaBank, and Banca Sella. These names span the core economies of the EU, and their participation undoubtedly lays a solid foundation for the credit backing and future promotion of the euro stablecoin.

When the banking system chooses to issue stablecoins, it is essentially doing one thing: extending bank credit and sovereign currency to the on-chain financial network in a regulated manner. This differs from the USD stablecoins issued by early crypto institutions. It is not a tool that grew organically from the market but an active deployment of institutional financial power.

This type of stablecoin, led by traditional financial giants and subject to strict regulation, stands in stark contrast to many existing stablecoins issued by crypto-native institutions. The national credit and regulatory safeguards behind it are expected to attract more institutional investors and traditional enterprises into the digital asset space, unlocking new application scenarios.

Robust Reserve Mechanism

The core of a stablecoin's "stability" lies in its transparent and reliable reserve mechanism. The Qivalis alliance understands this well, and the reserve plan they have announced is reassuring:

At least 40% held in bank deposits: This ensures high liquidity and immediate redemption capability for the token, significantly reducing the risk of a bank run.
The remainder invested in high-rated short-term eurozone government bonds: Investing in low-risk, high-credit sovereign bonds not only maintains asset safety but also provides stable returns to some extent, further enhancing the token's value support.

This combination of "bank deposits + sovereign bonds" is far more robust than stablecoins that rely solely on commercial paper or other risky assets, making it easier to gain the trust of regulators and the market.

The Future Structural Contest

If judged by current scale, the euro stablecoin is unlikely to challenge the liquidity advantage of USD stablecoins in the short term. This is undisputed.

However, what is truly worth paying attention to is not "who is bigger," but: Will on-chain finance evolve into a single-currency-dominated settlement system?

USD stablecoins are important not because they circulate in the crypto market, but because they are taking on the role of an "on-chain settlement unit."

Once on-chain transactions, cross-border trade, and digital asset pricing systems are fully denominated in USD stablecoins, the monetary structure of on-chain financial infrastructure will become highly centralized.

The emergence of Qivalis is essentially Europe's answer to this structural question: If a portion of future financial activities migrates on-chain, does the euro have an institutionalized channel to participate?

This is an "existential participation," not a scale confrontation.

From a broader perspective, stablecoins are no longer just liquidity tools for the crypto market. They are evolving into:

An on-chain representation of sovereign currency;
A new channel for government bond demand;
An alternative network for cross-border payments;
Part of digital financial infrastructure.

The successive entry of the United States, Asian financial centers, and the European banking system is no coincidence but a response to the same trend—financial structures are migrating toward digitization and tokenization.

Therefore, the significance of Qivalis does not lie in "whether it can challenge the dollar," but in: Whether Europe can secure an institutional entry point before the new generation of financial settlement layers is formed.

When the banking system begins issuing stablecoins, the focus of discussion is no longer "whether crypto is mainstream," but "how mainstream finance repositions itself in the on-chain world."

What is truly worth watching is not whether the euro wins out, but whether future on-chain finance will evolve into a multi-sovereign settlement structure.

If the on-chain world becomes part of global capital flows, then absence itself means ceding rule-making power.

This transformation is not about price fluctuations but a reshaping at the infrastructure level.

And Europe has chosen to participate.

*This content is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice. The market carries risks, and investment requires caution.

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit7m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit7m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit15m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit15m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News19m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News19m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit26m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit26m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit35m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit35m ago

Trading

Spot