Ethereum slips to $2.2K as ‘extreme fear’ hits – Why THIS level decides next bull run

AmbcryptoPublished on 2026-02-02Last updated on 2026-07-22

Abstract

Why THIS level decides next bull run.

Ethereum faced a tough weekend as its price fell by 17.38% from Saturday’s (the 31st of January) open at $$2,702.

ETH was trading at $2,219 at the time of writing, and the market-wide sentiment was extremely fearful.

Bitcoin [BTC] was down 4.56% in 24 hours and 12.7% in a week, according to CoinMarketCap data. The Fear and Greed index was at an abysmal 15.

Ethereum futures traders have faced $266.53 million in liquidations, with $204.38 million being long. Yet, this might be the time to buy more Ethereun.

Crazy? Perhaps, but the reward is great, and the setup’s invalidation is clearly defined.

Exploring the Ethereum opportunity

On the weekly chart, Ethereum has a bullish swing structure. This was set in place during the rally from $1,383 to $4,955 in 2025, when digital asset treasuries accumulated billions of dollars worth of ETH.

Institutional investment was still incoming. Bitmine [BMNR] has added 132,813 ETH to its holdings over the past month. It should be noted that their position was facing a 42.5% drawdown.

Going back to the technical perspective, the retracement from $4.9k in recent months has nearly reached the 78.6% retracement level at $2,147.

In the coming days or weeks, a brief dive below this level to hunt down liquidity is expected. A bullish recovery could begin thereafter.

AMBCrypto reported that investors were already treating the drop as a discount.

Is now the right time to buy?

Absolutely!

Provided a potential drop to $1,300 per ETH does not faze you. Long-term holders can look to keep buying more Ethereum.

The weekly chart showed that the swing structure was bullish, and a weekly session close below $1,383 is needed to flip this around.

The daily chart showed bears were dominant. The OBV was making new lows, and the DMI signaled a strong downtrend in progress.

Traders’ call to action- Assess risk and wait

Swing traders would want to see bullish strength around $2,000-$2,200 before looking to go long. Catching knives, or trying to time the market bottom, can lead to a bleeding portfolio.

A drop below $2,000 should be taken as an early warning signal. Such a scenario would reflect that bulls had little appetite for a reversal, making a drop toward $1,300 more likely.

Final Thoughts

  • The weekly swing structure of Ethereum was bullish, despite the heavy losses in recent months.
  • Swing traders should wait for signs of strength before looking to buy.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the price of Ethereum at the time of writing and how much did it fall from the weekend's open?

AEthereum was trading at $2,219 at the time of writing, having fallen 17.38% from Saturday's open at $2,702.

QWhat is the 'Fear and Greed Index' at, and what does this level signify for the market?

AThe Fear and Greed Index was at 15, which signifies a state of 'extreme fear' in the market.

QAccording to the technical perspective, what is the critical 78.6% retracement level for Ethereum and what is expected to happen around it?

AThe critical 78.6% retracement level is at $2,147. The article expects a brief dive below this level to hunt down liquidity, followed by a potential bullish recovery.

QWhat price level would invalidate the bullish weekly swing structure for Ethereum?

AA weekly session close below $1,383 is needed to invalidate the bullish weekly swing structure.

QWhat advice does the article give to swing traders regarding when to consider going long on Ethereum?

AThe article advises swing traders to wait for signs of bullish strength around the $2,000-$2,200 price range before looking to go long, rather than trying to catch the falling knife and time the market bottom.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报48m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报48m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片