Ethereum: Can $2k support hold amid $771M ETH dump?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Ethereum's price has faced significant downward pressure, dropping to around $2,266 and extending a month-long bearish trend. Major holders, including Trend Research, Garrett Jin, and a Bitcoin OG whale, have collectively sold approximately $771 million worth of ETH to repay loans and avoid liquidation. This has led to increased exchange supply and selling pressure, pushing ETH below key technical indicators. If selling continues, ETH risks falling below the $2,000 support level, with the next major support around $1,796. However, accumulation by entities like Bitmine, which purchased $46 million in ETH, may help absorb some selling pressure. A recovery above $2,656 is needed to reverse the bearish trend.

Ethereum [ETH] has faced intense pressure since it breached $3k support one week ago. With a sustained downward spiral, Ethereum touched a low of $2.1k, then stabilized around $2.2k.

At the time of writing, ETH traded at $ 2,266, down 1.51% on the daily chart, extending its month-long bearish trend.

With the market under intense stress, the ETH’s weakened structure has pushed holders, especially Ethereum whales, to capitulate.

Ethereum whales deleverage to pay loans

Amid prolonged market decline, Trend Research and Garrett Jin continued to offload ETH to repay loans and avoid liquidation.

According to Lookonchain, these two entities have deposited a total of 316,185 ETH, worth $738 million, on Binance for sale. Jin sold $82.37 million in ETH over the past day, while Trend Research sold $76.4 million in ETH.

Such selling constitutes a risk-driven market exit aimed at reducing the debt burden and improving market health, thereby decreasing risks of liquidation.

At the same time, the Bitcoin OG (10/11) has also continued to sell ETH. Onchain Lens reported that the whale deposited 15,000 ETH, valued at $33.35 million, into Binance to sell and repay the loan.

Usually, forced deleveraging creates extra selling pressure, further accelerating the downside risk.

Selling pressure hits a weekly high

With whales deleveraging, sell pressure on ETH has surged significantly. As such, Ethereum’s supply on exchanges rose considerably, as evidenced by the Exchange Supply Ratio (ESR).

According to CryptoQuant data, ESR reached a weekly high of 0.138, at press time, a substantial reversal from the prior trend.

When ESR rises, it suggests that most market participants have increased supply-side activity. Such market behavior reduces scarcity, thus further weakening the market.

Furthermore, Exchange Inflow rose to a two-month high of 2.3 million on the 3rd of February before falling to 210k.

Such massive inflows validated the early observation of increased sell-side pressure, often a prelude to lower prices as recently observed.

Is ETH at risk of slipping below $2k?

Ethereum has faced intense selling pressure across all market participants, mainly from whales forced exit. These prevailing conditions have pushed ETH to a significantly weakened position.

As a result, the altcoin fell below its Parabolic SAR and both medium- and long-term Fibonacci Bollinger Bands (FBB), as of writing, indicating strong downward momentum.

Typically, when ETH holdings are below these two levels, it signals the continuation of the dominant trend. Thus, if selling pressure persists, ETH could drop below $2k, with the lower boundary of the FBB at $ 1,796 acting as support.

However, despite the price drop, Ethereum Treasury Bitmine has held its ground and continued to accumulate at lower prices.

According to Lookonchain, Bitmine purchased 20,000 ETH, valued at approximately $46 million. With these purchases, Bitmine has positioned itself as the central pressure absorber.

Therefore, if Bitimine continues to hold and add positions despite rising losses, it will provide support, preventing further declines.

To avoid this downward spiral, ETH bulls must reclaim the Parabolic SAR at $2656, which will set the ground for a move towards $3k.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum extended its bearish streak and hovered around $2.2k.
  • ETH faced intense selling pressure as whale borrowers deleveraged, selling $771 million in ETH to repay loans and reduce liquidation risk.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trading price of Ethereum (ETH) and how much has it declined in the past day?

AAt the time of writing, Ethereum (ETH) is trading at $2,266, down 1.51% on the daily chart.

QWhy are large Ethereum holders, or 'whales', selling significant amounts of ETH?

AWhales are selling ETH to deleverage, repay loans, and avoid liquidation amid the prolonged market decline and price drop.

QHow much ETH, in total value, did Trend Research and Garrett Jin deposit onto Binance for sale?

ATrend Research and Garrett Jin deposited a total of 316,185 ETH, worth $738 million, on Binance for sale.

QWhat on-chain metric reached a weekly high, indicating increased selling pressure?

AThe Exchange Supply Ratio (ESR) reached a weekly high of 0.138, indicating increased supply-side activity and selling pressure.

QWhat key price level must Ethereum bulls reclaim to potentially reverse the downward trend and move towards $3k?

AEthereum bulls must reclaim the Parabolic SAR level at $2,656 to set the ground for a move towards $3k.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit1h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片