Empery’s Bitcoin treasury faces revolt after 49% stock crash

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-25Last updated on 2026-02-25

Abstract

Empery Digital Inc., a major corporate holder of Bitcoin, is facing a significant internal revolt from its shareholders following a 49% crash in its stock price. A key shareholder, Tice Brown, who owns 9.8% of the company, has publicly demanded the immediate sale of the firm's entire Bitcoin treasury, the return of the proceeds to investors, and the resignation of the CEO and Board of Directors. Brown accused management of self-enrichment and criticized a recent share buyback offer as a move to protect their own positions rather than investor capital. The company holds 4,081 BTC, valued at approximately $265.7 million, but is facing a 44% loss on its investment with an average purchase price of $117,000. The value of its Bitcoin holdings has declined by $244 million since October, mirroring the steep drop in its stock price. The shareholder's demand to liquidate the Bitcoin position poses a risk of further depressing BTC's price, which would, in turn, cause additional losses for the company and its shareholders.

Cryptocurrencies have gained significant popularity, particularly among Digital Asset Trading (DAT) companies. Reflecting this trend, more than 193 firms now hold Bitcoin [BTC] on their balance sheets.

One example is Empery Digital Inc., which began aggressively accumulating and holding BTC in 2025 as major companies embraced crypto.

However, with BTC now struggling, the company has faced a massive internal revolt, especially from shareholders, who are worried about market uncertainty.

Shareholder revolt challenges Bitcoin strategy

In a major setback for Empery Digital Inc., a key shareholder staged a public revolt, challenging the company’s BTC‐focused strategy.

Tice Brown demanded that the firm sell all its BTC holdings, return the proceeds to investors, and that both the CEO and Board of Directors resign. In his letter, Brown, who owns 9.8% of the company, accused management of enriching themselves at the expense of shareholders.

Brown decried that the firm’s leadership privately approached him, offering him a deal to buy back his shares at 100% of the firm’s mNAV.

However, he refused the proposal, arguing that such moves aimed to preserve management’s position rather than investors’ capital.

At the same time, the shareholder criticized the company’s buyback program, accusing it of exploiting shareholders. In response to the letter, the firm accused Mr. Brown of furthering self-interest and misrepresentation of facts.

The company argued that the attempted repurchase of his shares was in the company’s and its shareholders’ best interests.

Assessing Empery’s Bitcoin position?

Undoubtedly, the shareholders’ call for a selloff of Bitcoin holdings is significant, as Empery holds a substantial BTC position.

Data from Bitcoin Treasuries showed that Empery Digital Inc. holds 4081 BTC, worth $265.7 million, making it the 23rd-largest corporate holder of Bitcoin.

With an average cost basis of $117k, Empery’s holdings are currently down 44%. Equally, the company has not made any purchases since September 2025.

With BTC in a strong downtrend, the company’s asset value dropped from $509 million in October to $265 million, a $244 million decline.

Likewise, the company’s stock value has plummeted 49% over the past six months. When BTC traded above $120k, EMPD traded above $15.

Since then, the share price has plunged to a low of $3.2, indicating the direct correlation between BTC price and the company’s stock value.

Therefore, if Empery dumps off its holdings as requested by a major shareholder, it will weaken already strained BTC. Under such circumstances, BTC continues to decline, and EMPD will drop further, threatening shareholders’ positions.


Final Summary

  • Empery Inc Shareholder called for the resignation firms CEO and board of directors.
  • Amid Bitcoin’s prolonged downtrend, Empery stock has plunged 44%, with its holdings down $244 million.

Related Questions

QWhat triggered the shareholder revolt at Empery Digital Inc.?

AThe shareholder revolt was triggered by the company's significant financial losses due to Bitcoin's price decline, with a key shareholder, Tice Brown, demanding the sale of all BTC holdings, return of proceeds to investors, and the resignation of the CEO and Board of Directors.

QHow much Bitcoin does Empery Digital Inc. hold, and what is its current value?

AEmpery Digital Inc. holds 4,081 BTC, which is currently worth $265.7 million, making it the 23rd-largest corporate holder of Bitcoin.

QWhat is the decline in Empery's stock value over the past six months?

AEmpery's stock value has plummeted by 49% over the past six months, dropping from above $15 to a low of $3.2 per share.

QWhat did shareholder Tice Brown accuse the company's management of?

ATice Brown accused the management of enriching themselves at the expense of shareholders and criticized the buyback program as exploitative, arguing that their actions aimed to preserve management's position rather than protect investors' capital.

QWhat was the company's response to Tice Brown's demands?

AThe company accused Mr. Brown of furthering his self-interest and misrepresenting facts, arguing that the attempted share repurchase was in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.

Related Reads

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

On June 5th, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox disclosed a critical soundness vulnerability in the project's latest Orchard privacy pool. This flaw, found in the elliptic curve multiplication constraints, could allow an attacker to create unlimited counterfeit ZEC within the shielded pool, with transactions appearing valid. The vulnerability was discovered in late May by security researcher Taylor Hornby, who utilized Anthropic's new Opus 4.8 AI model for a targeted audit. The Zcash ecosystem had already performed an emergency network upgrade to patch the issue. However, the detailed disclosure triggered severe market panic, causing ZEC's price to plummet over 30% in a single day. Notably, prominent investor Arthur Hayes announced he had sold his entire ZEC position following the news. The incident starkly challenges the "technological trust" narrative central to privacy coins. Despite years of top-tier cryptographic audits, the bug persisted until uncovered with advanced AI-assisted research. This highlights the growing gap between theoretical perfection and practical implementation in privacy technology. The event serves as a industry-wide warning: in an AI-driven security landscape, the assumption that "undiscovered equals safe" is obsolete. It underscores the urgent need for continuous, proactive security practices combining AI audits, formal verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

foresightnews_api10m ago

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

foresightnews_api10m ago

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

**Vitalik Buterin Proposes New DeFi Design to Eliminate Forced Liquidations** Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has published a proposal for a new decentralized finance (DeFi) architecture aimed at removing the automatic liquidation mechanisms prevalent in current lending protocols. The core idea involves creating synthetic assets using options as building blocks, fundamentally avoiding the抵押借贷结构 that triggers forced sell-offs. The proposal responds to a recurring flaw in DeFi: during sharp market downturns, mass自动清算 of under-collateralized positions can exacerbate price declines, creating systemic selling pressure and market instability, as evidenced by recent crypto market volatility. Buterin's model would split an asset like 1 ETH into two option-like derivatives, P and N, pegged to a price index with a set strike price and expiration. At expiry, an oracle determines the settlement price to allocate the underlying ETH between P and N holders. This design eliminates the "cliff" of instant liquidation. Instead, a position's value would gradually drift from its target peg if not actively rebalanced by the user, transferring the rebalancing decision from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on high-frequency, real-time oracle price feeds, which are vulnerable to manipulation and errors in current systems. The delayed settlement in the options model allows for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. However, significant challenges remain for practical adoption. High transaction costs (slippage) from frequent rebalancing on automated market makers (AMMs) could erode user funds. The model may not be suitable for stablecoins requiring a strict 1:1 dollar peg, as it inherently allows for value drift. Success would depend on developing new liquidity provisioning models and deep markets for these synthetic assets. The proposal represents a fundamental rethinking of DeFi risk management, challenging the industry to explore alternatives to被动集中平仓 rather than merely optimizing existing liquidation processes. It remains a theoretical framework awaiting implementation and testing by development teams.

foresightnews_api13m ago

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

foresightnews_api13m ago

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Transformation of Crypto

Title: The Decline of Bitcoin Marks the Transformation of Crypto While Bitcoin's price recently fell below $70,000, down approximately 45% from its peak, the broader crypto industry is not following it into decline. Instead, crypto is maturing and evolving beyond its dependence on Bitcoin's price movements. Two of Bitcoin's core functions are being usurped. First, AI has captured its role as the primary speculative asset. AI, with its tangible revenue, explosive demand, and massive capital inflows ($700-830 billion in 2024), is siphoning off the speculative "hot money" that once drove Bitcoin. It also contributes to a sustained high-interest-rate environment, further tightening liquidity for assets like Bitcoin. Second, dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDC and USDT have replaced Bitcoin as the crypto market's foundational currency and primary on/off-ramp. Most trading pairs and on-chain transactions are now settled in stablecoins, severing the historical link where all capital inflows had to pass through Bitcoin first. This decoupling allows projects to thrive based on their own fundamentals rather than Bitcoin's price. Examples include Hyperliquid, an on-chain derivatives exchange with annual revenues of $8-13 billion, and prediction market platform Polymarket, valued at $200 billion with $3.65 billion in annual fees. These projects are evaluated on traditional metrics like revenue and user growth. New opportunities are emerging, particularly around privacy. Privacy coins like Zcash (ZEC) are seeing surging demand, while infrastructure like NEAR enables private, cross-chain asset transfers without requiring users to hold a specific token—privacy becomes a universal service layer. In this new paradigm, stablecoins are the universal cash, various project tokens represent equity, and privacy-enabled cross-chain coordination layers (like NEAR) act as the critical infrastructure connecting a fragmented, multi-chain ecosystem. Bitcoin is now just one asset among many. The era where the entire crypto market moved in lockstep with Bitcoin is over. The industry's health should now be judged by project fundamentals—real revenue, active users, and tokenomics that capture value—and the development of the underlying infrastructure enabling a mature, dollar-denominated crypto economy.

foresightnews_api16m ago

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Transformation of Crypto

foresightnews_api16m ago

Lightspark CEO: In Ten Years, Bitcoin Will Be as Invisible as TCP/IP, Yet Power Trillions in Daily Transactions

A decade from now, Bitcoin will function like TCP/IP — invisible yet foundational, supporting trillions in daily transactions globally, according to Lightspark CEO David Marcus. In this future, a coffee shop in Lagos receives instant payment, a manufacturer in São Paulo settles an invoice with a supplier in Ho Chi Minh City, and a freelancer in Bangalore gets paid weekly from an Austin startup — all via Bitcoin's settlement layer, with none of the parties consciously interacting with it. This vision parallels the adoption of open protocols: first driven by necessity where existing systems fail, then scaling rapidly as tools mature and economic benefits become clear. The structural shift begins with wallets. Modern non-custodial wallets, like Spark, allow users to hold dollars, local currency, and Bitcoin in a single address, seamlessly switching between them. This eliminates friction and revolutionizes global custody, moving significant deposits to user-controlled keys not by ideology, but by superior utility. As a result, Bitcoin becomes the default savings layer for billions, as its fixed supply and appreciating value make it a rational choice for savers holding it alongside stablecoins in their everyday wallets. Businesses follow a similar path, from small companies in emerging markets to multinational corporations, holding Bitcoin alongside operational stablecoins. The latest trend is direct Bitcoin transactions for commerce. When both parties hold Bitcoin, transacting in it becomes the simplest option — no conversions, no intermediary currency. This starts in niche areas like high-value B2B settlements but grows as infrastructure makes sending Bitcoin as easy as stablecoins. An accelerating force is AI agents. By 2036, AI agents conducting commerce on behalf of individuals and firms will increasingly choose Bitcoin for settlement. Optimizing for speed, finality, and minimal counterparty risk across jurisdictions, they find Bitcoin's global, neutral, and programmable network ideal for netting and settling obligations. Thus, Bitcoin is becoming the native currency for machine commerce, just as it has become a native savings asset for humans. The global monetary system is being rebuilt from the protocol layer: open infrastructure, default self-custody, Bitcoin settling everything underneath, with stablecoins as the interface. Most users won't think about Bitcoin when they transact — and they won't need to.

foresightnews_api20m ago

Lightspark CEO: In Ten Years, Bitcoin Will Be as Invisible as TCP/IP, Yet Power Trillions in Daily Transactions

foresightnews_api20m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片