Double Zero slides 12% as momentum fades – Is the worst over for 2Z?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-26Last updated on 2026-01-26

Abstract

Double Zero (2Z) has declined over 12% amid a broader market downturn and significant long liquidations exceeding $719,000. Technical indicators remain bearish, with the MACD showing a death cross and the RSI trending downward around 46, suggesting potential further losses. A key demand zone lies between $0.114 and $0.118, which could serve as support. A rebound from this level toward $0.15 would represent a 28% gain, but current spot buying of around $874,400 appears insufficient to drive a strong recovery. Despite the bearish signals, derivatives traders maintain a slight long bias, with a Long-to-Short Ratio of 1.043 and a positive funding rate, indicating lingering bullish sentiment.

Double Zero has moved decisively lower following a major liquidity shift that triggered broad capitulation.

At press time, the altcoin was down over 12%, with rebound prospects appearing muted as momentum remains notably weak. While market participants continue to anticipate a reversal, the technical confluence needed to support such a move has yet to materialize.

Downtrend deepens as 2Z loses momentum

Double Zero’s [2Z] decline does not appear to be slowing at the time of publication. From a technical perspective, the chart showed an absence of immediate support levels—zones that typically act as buffers for price stabilization or rebounds.

However, the chart does reveal a lower ascending support that could serve as a potential pivot for price action.

This structure aligns with a demand zone between $0.114 and $0.118, an area that may provide the necessary footing for the price to stabilize or attempt a recovery.

A rebound from this zone toward the $0.15 level would represent a potential 28% upside, with additional gains possible if momentum improves.

That said, trader confidence remains fragile. Over the past 24 hours, long-positioned traders have incurred losses exceeding $719,700, compared to just $2,400 in losses recorded by short sellers.

Technical indicators tilt firmly bearish

Technical indicators continue to argue against aggressive accumulation at current levels. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remained firmly bearish after printing a classic “death cross.”

This pattern forms when the MACD line crosses below the signal line and is often associated with prolonged downside pressure. Historically, such setups have preceded sharper declines as selling momentum accelerates.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) reinforces this bearish setup. At the time of publication, the RSI had slipped into the bearish zone between 30 and 50 and printed a reading of 46, with momentum still trending lower.

A sustained decline in the RSI typically reflects weakening market strength and raises the likelihood of continued downside price action.

If both indicators remain under pressure—particularly with the MACD firmly in negative territory—2Z could face deeper losses in the near term.

Spot demand lags as derivatives traders hold long bias

Spot market activity showed signs of accumulation, with buyers adding to positions over the past two weeks. However, the scale of these purchases remains modest.

According to CoinGlass Spot Netflow data, total spot purchases over this period amounted to approximately $874,400. While this inflow may help slow the pace of the decline, it remains insufficient to provide meaningful price support.

Meanwhile, sentiment in the 2Z perpetual market continued to hint at a potential rebound near the previously identified support zone.

The Long-to-Short Ratio, which tracks directional positioning—above 1 indicating long dominance and below 1 signaling short control—supports this view.

At press time, the ratio stood at 1.043. In addition, the Open Interest–Weighted Funding Rate printed a positive 0.0019%, suggesting that capital positioning remained tilted in favor of bullish traders.

This indicates that despite recent liquidation losses, trader conviction on the long side remains intact. Whether this positioning holds may prove pivotal in shaping 2Z’s next directional move.


Final Thoughts

  • 2Z may extend its decline until it finds a support level capable of cushioning further losses, even as a potential 28% rebound remains in view.
  • Indicators point to a short-term pullback, although spot traders and perpetual 2Z traders continue to maintain a bullish bias.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage decline in Double Zero (2Z) at the time of publication?

ADouble Zero was down over 12% at the time of publication.

QWhat is the potential upside percentage if 2Z rebounds from the demand zone to the $0.15 level?

AA rebound from the demand zone to the $0.15 level would represent a potential 28% upside.

QWhat key bearish technical pattern did the MACD indicator show?

AThe MACD indicator showed a classic 'death cross', which occurs when the MACD line crosses below the signal line.

QWhat does a Long-to-Short Ratio above 1 indicate for the 2Z perpetual market?

AA Long-to-Short Ratio above 1 indicates that long positions are dominant in the market.

QWhat was the total value of spot purchases over the two weeks leading up to the article?

ATotal spot purchases over the past two weeks amounted to approximately $874,400.

Related Reads

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手17m ago

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手17m ago

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit25m ago

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit25m ago

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1h ago

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片