Dogecoin loses $0.10 support: Can DOGE stop the downtrend?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-20Last updated on 2026-02-20

Abstract

Dogecoin (DOGE) broke below the critical $0.10 support level, reaching a local low of $0.095 before a slight rebound to $0.098. The downtrend is driven by persistent bearish pressure, with sellers dominating the market for over a month. Key indicators like the Bulls and Bears Power and Buyer-Seller Strength show significant bearish control, while exchange data reveals higher sell volumes and a negative buy-sell delta. The Price Momentum Oscillator remains negative, and the RSI stays below 50, indicating continued downward momentum. If the trend persists, DOGE could drop to $0.092 or even $0.08. A reversal would require reclaiming and holding above $0.11.

With bearish pressure and market weakness persisting, Dogecoin [DOGE] broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099.

At press time, DOGE was trading at $0.098, up 0.73%, reflecting heightened volatility.

Bearish pressure strains Dogecoin’s structure

DOGE lost its $ 0.10 support level again, largely driven by heightened sell-side activity. As such, DOGE sellers have dumped at every opportunity, further straining the market.

Looking at the Bulls and Bears power indicator on TradingView, the Bears have commanded total control of the market.

Bears have dominated the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January, and all attempts by bulls to regain control have failed.

At press time, the Bears’ position was 64 compared to 9 for the Bulls, reflecting a significant gap in their market presence. As such, although bulls are active, their presence remains insufficient to sustain a trend reversal.

The Buyer-Seller Strength indicator further supports this. Sellers have remained relatively powerful, with their strength hiking to 68 at press time.

Coupled with that, exchange activity also echoed this bearish dominance. According to Coinalyze, Dogecoin recorded higher Sell Volume for five consecutive days, signaling a lack of bullish conviction.

Over the past day, for example, the memecoin saw 697 million in Sell Volume compared to 619 million in Buy Volume. As a result, the market recorded a negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million, a clear sign of aggressive selling.

Historically, such market behavior has tended to strengthen downside and weaken any upside momentum, leading to lower prices.

Is DOGE at risk of further slip?

Dogecoin traded below its critical support level, amid sustained bearish pressure. With bears running riot in the market, all attempts by bulls to hold on have proved futile.

In fact, the memecoin’s Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) remained negative despite making a bullish crossover days ago. With the PMO holding a negative, it suggests that most price changes have been negative on average.

Thus, markets have closed at lower levels, signaling a bearish trend and confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, not a mere pullback.

At the same time, the memecoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has remained stuck below 50 for a week, further validating this bearishness. Persistent bearish momentum signals a likelihood of downside continuation.

A trend continuation could see DOGE drop to $0.092, most likely losing its $0.09 support, and then fall to $0.08. To invalidate this bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim $0.1 and firmly hold $0.11.


Final Summary

  • Dogecoin slipped below $0.1, hitting a low of $0.095 before rising slightly to $0.098 at press time.
  • DOGE’s downside spiral continued amid persisting bearish dominance in the market.

Related Questions

QWhat was Dogecoin's price movement after losing the $0.10 support level?

ADogecoin broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099. At press time, it was trading at $0.098.

QAccording to the Bulls and Bears power indicator, how long have bears controlled the DOGE market?

ABears have commanded total control of the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January.

QWhat does the negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million indicate about market activity?

AThe negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million is a clear sign of aggressive selling, with sell volume (697 million) significantly outpacing buy volume (619 million) over the past day.

QWhat two key price levels does DOGE need to reclaim to invalidate the current bearish scenario?

ATo invalidate the bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim the $0.10 level and then firmly hold above $0.11.

QWhat do the Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) and Relative Strength Index (RSI) suggest about DOGE's trend?

AThe PMO remained negative, confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, and the RSI has been stuck below 50 for a week, both validating persistent bearish momentum and a likelihood of further downside.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit4m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit4m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit12m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit12m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit20m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit20m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit23m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit23m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit26m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片