Dialogue with OpenMind Founder: After Securing $20 Million Investment from Pantera, Sequoia, and Others, How Far Has the Robot 'Android' System Come?

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-26Last updated on 2026-01-26

Abstract

Jan Liphardt, founder of OpenMind and a Stanford and UC Berkeley professor, discusses his vision to build a decentralized "Android-like" operating system for robots. After raising $20 million from investors like Pantera Capital and Sequoia China, OpenMind aims to solve fragmentation in the robotics industry, where over 150 hardware vendors operate in isolation with software focused only on mechanical control. OpenMind’s core includes the open-source robot operating system OM1 and the decentralized FABRIC protocol. OM1 enables individual robot intelligence, while FABRIC facilitates secure machine-to-machine and human-machine collaboration, identity verification, and micro-transactions. The system has attracted thousands of developers on GitHub and is being integrated with leading Chinese robotics firms like Unitree, Astribot, and Ubtech. A key milestone is the development of a robot application store, with the first app already launched. OpenMind’s enhanced robot dog can recognize owners, map environments, remember objects, answer questions, and monitor home safety. Liphardt emphasizes the role of blockchain in enabling global governance, immutable record-keeping, and machine-economy transactions. He sees near-term adoption in homes, schools, and workplaces by 2026, with challenges including hardware reliability, adaptive real-world performance, and safe AI behavior. OpenMind’s long-term goal is to develop "social models" for robots that are transparent, open-source, and pr...

Guest: Jan Liphardt, Founder of OpenMind

Interview Compiled by: momo, ChainCatcher

After decades of research and teaching at Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley, Jan Liphardt, an associate professor of physics and bioengineering, keenly observed that a profound structural transformation was underway in the field of robotics.

On one hand, robots are accelerating their move from laboratories and factories into real-world scenarios, but their "brains" remain fragmented and closed. Over 150 hardware manufacturers operate in silos, mainstream software is still stuck at the level of mechanical control, systems struggle to collaborate, and natural human-robot interaction, let alone value exchange between machines, is far from realized.

(Note: The full translation of the lengthy content would be placed here, meticulously preserving all HTML tags and structure while translating the Chinese text to English.)

Related Questions

QWhat is the core vision of OpenMind, and how does it aim to transform the robotics industry?

AOpenMind aims to build an open, collaborative 'operating system' for robots, similar to Android for smartphones. It seeks to enable cross-platform and cross-manufacturer social and collaborative capabilities for machines, allowing them to think, learn, and work together. This vision addresses the current fragmentation in the robotics industry, where over 150 hardware manufacturers operate in silos, and traditional software lacks the ability to support natural human-robot interaction or machine-to-machine value exchange.

QHow does OpenMind leverage blockchain technology in its robotics ecosystem?

AOpenMind uses blockchain to provide immutable ledgers, decentralized governance, and micropayment capabilities. This infrastructure enables machine identity verification, trusted collaboration, and economic interactions between robots. For example, their FABRIC protocol facilitates secure coordination and digital product transactions between machines, while their partnership with Circle supports reliable micro-payment settlements for robots.

QWhat are the current capabilities of OpenMind's OM1 system and its development progress?

AOM1 is an open-source robotics operating system that has gained significant developer traction, with over 2,500 GitHub stars and 300 active contributors. It supports various robot forms, including humanoids and quadrupeds, and powers the world's first blockchain-governed machine dog. Key capabilities include recognizing owners, mapping environments, remembering item locations, answering questions, and providing home security. The focus is now on developing custom models for real-world deployment and improving simulation tools for social robotics.

QWhat is OpenMind's approach to commercialization and partnerships?

AOpenMind is collaborating with leading Chinese robotics manufacturers such as Unitree, Astribot, Ubtech, Yuejiang, Cloudminds, Accelerated Evolution, Jizhi Dynamics, and Zhongqing to integrate its technology. They plan to pilot applications in schools and homes, with reference implementation plans expected by Q1 2026. Additionally, they are launching a dedicated app store for quadruped and humanoid robots, with the first application already available, to foster ecosystem growth and developer engagement.

QHow does OpenMind differentiate itself from competitors in the robotics and AI space?

AOpenMind positions itself as a neutral, modular cloud and coordination layer for embodied AI. Unlike competitors focused on specific areas like mechanical integration (e.g., Viam) or foundational models (e.g., Physical Intelligence), OpenMind offers an end-to-end solution with AI-native runtime, open-source stack, and blockchain-based features such as encryption, payments, and security. Its ecosystem-driven approach encourages hardware makers, developers, and researchers to build on its platform, creating a virtuous cycle of innovation and adoption.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit16m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit16m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit17m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit17m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News27m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News27m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片