Crypto xAI Weekly Roundup: TAO Surges 40% in a Week, Decentralized Computing Trains First Competitive-Grade Large Model

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-18Last updated on 2026-03-18

Abstract

This week in crypto xAI was dominated by Bittensor subnet Templar's historic achievement: the decentralized pre-training of Covenant-72B, a 720-billion-parameter LLM, reportedly rivaling LLaMA-2-70B. Trained on 1.1 trillion tokens using consumer-grade hardware within Bittensor’s permissionless network, this milestone shifts the narrative from proving subnet viability to delivering outputs competitive with centralized alternatives. TAO surged 40% in response. The broader DeAI market cap rose 12% to $16.2B, with FET (+61%) and RENDER (+31%) also posting significant gains. The robotics sector grew 6% to $811M, led by PEAQ’s 48% rise. Nansen DEX flow data showed net inflows into sUSDAI, WTAO, and VIRTUAL, indicating smart money accumulation. x402 transaction analysis revealed a key trend: while transaction counts fell, the total transaction value spiked, signaling a shift toward higher-value, legitimate commercial use cases over low-value spam. AWS further validated the space by releasing a full technical reference architecture for x402, marking its transition from concept to infrastructure.

Author: 0xSammy

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Bittensor subnet Templar has completed the largest decentralized LLM pre-training in history—Covenant-72B with 72 billion parameters. Its performance is reportedly comparable to LLaMA-2-70B, and the entire training process was based on consumer-grade internet hardware.

This is not a proof of concept but a delivered product. It elevates Bittensor's narrative from "subnets can exist" to "subnets can produce outputs that compete with centralized alternatives."

At the same time, AWS released the complete x402 technical reference architecture. These two events combined drove the DeAI sector up 12% in a single week.

Full Text Below:

Headline of the Week: TAO and Covenant-72B

On March 10, Templar (Bittensor Subnet 3) completed the largest decentralized LLM pre-training in history: Covenant-72B. 72 billion parameters. Approximately 1.1 trillion tokens. Fully trained on consumer-grade internet hardware within Bittensor's permissionless network. Anyone with a GPU can freely join or leave. Performance is reportedly comparable to LLaMA-2-70B.

This upgrades Bittensor's core thesis from "subnets can exist" to "subnets can produce outputs that compete with centralized alternatives."

A permissionless network of consumer-grade GPUs, achieving synergy on a scale previously associated only with hyperscale cloud providers. Before Covenant-72B, decentralized training was just a promise on the roadmap; now, it is a delivered product.

Within 24 hours of the announcement, TAO rose 19%, with a weekly gain of +39.8%. Templar's post on X received 1.7 million views:

Three ecosystem subnets (SN3 Templar, SN4 Targon, SN39 Basilica) ranked among the top eight gainers on CoinGecko that day. The structural dynamics between TAO and subnets amplify buying pressure: investors need TAO to acquire subnet tokens, so concentrated demand for any single subnet cascades into accumulation of the underlying asset.

The price action is now anchored to a verifiable technical milestone. Covenant-72B is a fully trained model. Grayscale's Bittensor Trust SEC filing (December 2025) is still pending approval; xTAO continues to accumulate as the largest corporate holder. Institutional access is being built in parallel.

A) DeAI Total Market Cap Analysis

This week, the total DeAI market cap increased by $1.9 billion (+12%), reaching $16.2 billion:

The core news this week was Templar's Covenant-72B (details above). The overall AI sector benefited from Bittensor's catalyst effect and continued institutional narrative momentum around Agent infrastructure.

TAO (7-day +40%): $277.51, market cap $2.66 billion. Catalyst: Covenant-72B; structural dynamics from subnets to TAO amplified gains.

FET (7-day +61%): $0.2365, market cap $534 million. The strongest weekly gainer among top DeAI assets. The Artificial Superintelligence Alliance benefited from sector rotation catalyzed by TAO, with capital broadly flowing into AI tokens.

RENDER (7-day +31%): $1.88, market cap $976 million. Covenant-72B proves distributed GPU networks can train competitive models, providing a tailwind for the decentralized computing narrative.

NEAR (7-day +16%): $1.47, market cap $1.89 billion. IronClaw (a security-hardened rewrite of OpenClaw in Rust, deployed on TEE) and NEARCON 2026 catalysts continue to have an effect. NEAR's positioning as enterprise-grade OpenClaw infrastructure keeps it in AI buying interest.

ICP (7-day +9%): $2.71, market cap $1.49 billion. Caffeine AI, a self-writing application platform on DFINITY's ICP platform, continues to attract developers (reportedly hundreds of thousands of monthly unique visitors according to Dominic Williams). Version V3 is upcoming, featuring Claude Code integration. The "Mission 70" tokenomics proposal aims to reduce annual inflation by 70% by the end of 2026, with Caffeine-driven compute burning as a key mechanism. Over the past 30 days, ICP ranked first in code development activity among AI/Big Data crypto projects.

VIRTUAL (7-day -16%): $0.7952, market cap $523 million. Pullback following AGDP-driven rally. But the more interesting story for VIRTUAL this week is in the x402 facilitator data: Virtuals have already ranked among the top three facilitators by transaction volume on x402 via ACP.

B) Robotics Total Market Cap Analysis

This week, the total Robotics sector market cap increased by $44 million (+6%), reaching $811 million:

PEAQ (7-day +48%): $0.02005, market cap $37.8 million. The standout performer. peaq released a new video explaining the robotics narrative and its Robotics SDK (compatible with ROS 2, enabling any robot to obtain a peaq ID, perform on-chain payments/receipts, and data verification). Hashkey Capital's "Machine Economy" research report listed peaq as the foundational L1 for machine identity, payments, and governance. Over 60 DePIN projects across 22 industries are operational on the network; the Dubai VARA regulatory sandbox is open for on-chain robotics businesses.

ROBO (7-day -28%): $0.03336, market cap $74.9 million. Fabric Protocol (OpenMind/Fabric Foundation) is finding price equilibrium after initial listing enthusiasm. Still a relatively new player in the robotics category.

GEOD (7-day -14%): $0.1371, market cap $58.1 million. 24-hour trading volume only $206k, despite GEO-SWARM being live on Kickstarter and GEOD coverage added by Solana/Blockworks' Lightspeed institutional platform, which is expected to improve institutional visibility over time.

Crypto AI Agent Sector

a) Nansen DEX Fund Flows (All Traders, 7-Day)

sUSDAI (+$1.83M net inflow): Largest net inflow in the AI sector. The yield layer for USDai, a GPU-collateralized stablecoin protocol (Permian Labs; backed by Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures, YZi Labs). Lends against physical GPU infrastructure, returning yield via sUSDAI. PayPal/PYUSD integration; peak TVL $658M. CHIP governance token launched via CoinList in late February; capital is rotating into the yield layer. DeFi capital meets physical AI infrastructure financing.

WTAO (+$1.00M net inflow): $11.0M bought vs $10.0M sold. Confirms Covenant-72B drove real DEX accumulation behavior.

VIRTUAL (+$810k net inflow): Net inflow remained positive despite a 16.3% weekly price drop. $40.19M bought vs $39.38M sold. Smart money buying the dip. This group has the deepest liquidity at $29.18M.

RENDER (+$483k net inflow): Slight positive. Sector tailwinds, no specific catalyst. Render Con 2026 is upcoming.

LINK (+$458k net inflow): Noteworthy that Chainlink appears in the AI sector filter. Chainlink Runtime Engine is the connective tissue for Agent infrastructure; explicitly referenced in an AWS blog post this week regarding CRE integration.

b) Nansen Public Figure Fund Flows (7-Day)

DRV (+$264k net inflow, 7 traders): Derive, a decentralized derivatives protocol based on OP Stack. +48.84% in 7 days, market cap $111M. Institutional staking goes live on March 23; 25% of fees used for DRV buybacks.

FAI (+$187k net inflow, 4 traders): Freysa AI, a sovereign Agent stack on Base. Market cap $62M. Uses TEE and zkTLS, enabling Agents to hold their own keys. Similar to OpenClaw but approaches from a cryptographic sovereignty angle.

WTAO (+$105k net inflow, 3 traders): Corroborates the signal around Covenant-72B seen among all traders.

c) x402 Analysis

i) Transaction Count Down, Transaction Value Up

Artemis data tells two stories:

Transaction Count (Left Chart): Significant decline from Dec/Jan peaks. Daily average transactions dropped from over 1.5-2 million to the hundreds of thousands.

Transaction Value (Right Chart): Sharp uptick after a plateau in Jan/Feb, pushing daily average transaction value to $3-4 million. Concentrated in Infrastructure & Utilities and Data-as-a-Service categories, with Agent-to-Agent Services contributing secondarily.

This divergence is the most important signal for x402 currently. Decreasing transaction count with increasing transaction value means the average transaction size is growing. Fake transactions are being washed out; what remains are fewer, higher-value real commercial transactions.

Based on the current merchant landscape, the dominant categories likely represent: Agents paying for compute (cloud GPU, inference nodes, Chutes); API data source access (Firecrawl, StableEnrich, market intelligence data); browser sessions (Browserbase); and content generation (Freepik).

Agent-to-Agent Services is structurally the most interesting: autonomous Agents paying other Agents to complete subtasks.

AI-generated content and token issuance, which dominated early transaction counts, have largely been washed out.

ii) a16z and the Data Measurement Gap

a16z partner Noah Levine pointed out that "real" transaction volume is significantly lower than the inflated numbers caused by fake activity earlier this year. Bloomberg reported x402's 30-day payment volume at $24 million (data from x402.org); Allium Labs' data was around $3 million; Artemis, filtering out wash trading, estimated real volume at about $1.6 million.

But this gap reveals how early the measurement infrastructure is—especially as more mature institutions begin adopting this open protocol: Stripe, Cloudflare, Vercel, and Google have all integrated x402.

These institutions are betting not on the current $1.6 million per month, but on what that number becomes when Agents become the default buyers.

iii) Top Facilitators Ranking (Past 7 Days)

The facilitator ranking is diversifying: high-frequency micro-payments (Dexter), institutional API access (Coinbase), structured Agent commerce (Virtuals/ACP).

Virtuals Protocol (144.14k requests, $419.67k volume): Ranked third by request count, but highest by transaction value. Average price per request ~$2.72 (5x Coinbase's, 54x Dexter's). 3,690 buyers对应仅 2 sellers.

This is ACP settling structured Agent-to-Agent commercial transactions: a few service Agents completing high-value tasks for thousands of buyers.

On March 10, Virtuals and the Ethereum Foundation dAI team jointly submitted ERC-8183, formalizing the trusted Agent commercial transaction lifecycle alongside x402 (payments) and ERC-8004 (identity/reputation).

iv) AWS Releases Full x402 Reference Architecture

On March 15, AWS published "x402 and Agent Commerce: Redefining Autonomous Payments in Financial Services" on its industry blog, including a complete technical reference architecture.

When AWS releases a production-grade reference architecture with open-source code for a native crypto payment standard, the protocol moves from the conceptual stage to the infrastructure stage.

To learn more about x402's trajectory, follow Khala Research, as we will release a full report later this week. Below is the current ecosystem map:

Disclaimer: The content covered in this communication should not be considered investment or financial advice. It is for informational and educational purposes only.

Disclosure: I hold some of these assets and have cooperative relationships with certain projects mentioned in this communication.

Related Questions

QWhat is the significance of the Covenant-72B model trained by Templar on the Bittensor network?

AThe Covenant-72B model is a 72-billion parameter LLM pre-trained on 1.1 trillion tokens, entirely on consumer-grade internet hardware within the Bittensor network. Its significance lies in being the largest decentralized LLM pre-training to date, with performance reportedly comparable to centralized models like LLaMA-2-70B. This upgrades Bittensor's narrative from proving subnets can exist to demonstrating they can produce outputs competitive with centralized alternatives.

QWhat was the price performance of TAO following the announcement of Covenant-72B, and what drove this performance?

AFollowing the announcement of Covenant-72B, the price of TAO increased by 19% within 24 hours and saw a weekly gain of +39.8%. This performance was driven by the technical milestone of the successful training, which validated the decentralized AI narrative. The structural dynamic between TAO and its subnets also amplified buying pressure, as investors need TAO to acquire subnet tokens.

QAccording to the article, what is the x402 protocol data showing about the nature of transactions?

AThe x402 protocol data shows a divergence: the number of transactions has decreased significantly from its peak, but the total transaction volume (in USD) has sharply increased. This indicates that the average transaction size is growing, suggesting that low-value, fake 'wash trading' is being cleaned out and replaced by fewer, but higher-value, genuine commercial transactions.

QWhich company released a full technical reference architecture for the x402 protocol, and why is this important?

AAWS released a full technical reference architecture for the x402 protocol. This is important because when a major cloud provider like AWS publishes a production-ready reference architecture with open-source code for a native crypto payment standard, it signifies the protocol's transition from a conceptual stage to an infrastructure stage, boosting its legitimacy and potential for institutional adoption.

QWhat role did the Virtuals Protocol play in the x402 ecosystem according to the merchant rankings?

AAccording to the 7-day merchant rankings, the Virtuals Protocol ranked third by number of requests but first by total transaction volume. Its high average transaction value (~$2.72 per request) and the structure of its business (3,690 buyers to just 2 sellers) indicate it is settling high-value, structured agent-to-agent commerce transactions through its ACP (Agent Commerce Protocol).

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit7m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit7m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit8m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit8m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News18m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News18m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit35m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit35m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片