"Crypto Retirement Plan" Heavily Criticized by Democrats: Trump Is "Harvesting" American Workers' Pensions

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-03Last updated on 2026-06-03

Abstract

Democratic senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), along with Representative Bobby Scott (D-VA), are urging the Labor Department to repeal a proposed rule that would open U.S. retirement savings accounts, such as 401(k)s, to investments in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and other alternative assets. The rule, stemming from an August executive order by President Trump, would provide a legal safe harbor for plan fiduciaries offering these volatile assets if they follow a prescribed process. The lawmakers argue in a 14-page letter that the rule dangerously weakens long-standing "prudent man" standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), potentially exposing the $14.2 trillion in 401(k) savings to high-risk, minimally regulated investments. They cite warnings from FINRA about crypto's high volatility and from the FBI about massive cryptocurrency scam losses. The letter also alleges a conflict of interest, noting that President Trump's adult children manage the family's crypto business, which has reportedly raised billions from digital token sales. They contend the rule change could enrich the Trump family at the expense of workers' retirement security. In defense, the Trump administration frames the rule as expanding worker choice. Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling stated it ends the department "picking winners and losers," requiring fiduciaries to follow a prudent process. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent supported it as a step ...

Original Author: Micah Zimmerman

Original Compilation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) have called on the Trump administration's Department of Labor to repeal a rule that would open U.S. retirement savings accounts to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The lawmakers argue this move would endanger workers' financial futures while allowing President Trump and his family to profit.

On Monday, the three Democrats sent a 14-page letter to Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling. Sanders, Warren, and House Education and the Workforce Committee Ranking Member Bobby Scott (D-VA) strongly condemned the rule proposed by the Department of Labor in March.

The rule would provide fiduciary protections for 401(k) plan sponsors, allowing them to offer volatile assets—including cryptocurrencies, private equity, and private credit—as long as the fiduciaries can demonstrate they have weighed relevant factors before offering them.

The letter states: "The proposed rule is harmful to American workers and runs counter to the law, congressional intent, existing regulations, and case law."

What the Rule Would Do

This proposal stems from an executive order President Trump signed last August, directing the Department of Labor to reconsider the treatment of alternative assets in retirement plans. Under current law, fiduciaries managing 401(k) plans must adhere to a strict "prudence" standard—a requirement rooted in the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and reinforced by Supreme Court precedent.

Democratic lawmakers argue the new rule would flip this standard. Fiduciaries would no longer need to prove they conducted due diligence; instead, they would be presumed to have acted prudently as long as they followed the process outlined in the rule.

The lawmakers state this shift conflicts with decades of legal precedent and would expose roughly $14.2 trillion in U.S. 401(k) accounts to assets with extreme price volatility and limited regulation.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has warned that crypto investments "exhibit higher volatility compared to traditional investment assets" and "pose a significantly higher risk of losing the entire investment." FBI reports indicate cryptocurrency scam losses exceeded $110 billion in 2025, one of the highest loss categories in cybercrime.

Trump Conflict of Interest Argument

The Democratic lawmakers' criticism extends beyond retirement policy, directly pointing to conflict of interest issues. Trump's adult children manage the family's crypto business, which, according to The Wall Street Journal, has raised approximately $50 billion for the Trump family since launching its digital currency last September.

The Trump family's crypto portfolio includes WLFI and USD1 tokens from World Liberty Financial, as well as the official Trump Meme Coin—which briefly surged above $75 around Trump's January 2025 inauguration before crashing to around $2.

The letter states: "The aforementioned change in the prudence standard expands opportunities for President Trump and his family to profit at the expense of taxpayers, workers, and retirees."

Consumer advocacy group Americans for Financial Reform expressed similar concerns. Its senior policy analyst, Oscar Valdés Viera, said: "Opening 401(k)s to these products could turn workers' retirement savings into a tool resembling a Ponzi scheme, providing a lifeline for an industry desperate for new funds."

The letter also cites elderly poverty data: Over 22.8% of American seniors live in poverty, compared to 5.1% in Denmark, 5.8% in France, and 12.6% in Germany—highlighting the risk retirees cannot afford to take significant losses.

The Administration's Defense

The Trump administration has described the rule as an effort to expand worker choice.

Acting Labor Secretary Sonderling said in a statement: "The days of the Department of Labor picking winners and losers are over. Our rule makes clear that managers must evaluate any potential product offering by following a prudent process."

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also expressed support, calling the rule "another step toward ushering in President Trump's 'Golden Age'."

Related Reads

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手3m ago

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手3m ago

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbit34m ago

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbit34m ago

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbit1h ago

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片