Crypto Analyst Points to the Bloody Monday Factor After Crypto Market Slips

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-19Last updated on 2026-01-19

Abstract

A crypto analyst has attributed the recent market downturn to "Bloody Monday," noting that nearly $100 billion was wiped out in 12 hours. The global crypto market cap fell 2.82% to around $3.13 trillion, with BTC and ETH declining 2.33% and 3.01%, respectively. Key factors include US tariff threats against several European nations and a shift in investor sentiment toward gold and silver amid trade tensions. Other global markets, including European and Japanese indices, also saw declines.

The crypto market is down, and a crypto analyst has pinned this to a factor called “Bloody Monday.” He further underlined the extent to which the market has lost its value in just 12 hours. Many more factors are possibly influencing the downswing across the globe.

Crypto Analyst on Bloody Monday

Ted Pillows, a notable crypto market analyst, has referred to today’s decline as “Bloody Monday.” He said that the factor was back, hinting that it could be affecting the movement of the price. Ted further added that almost $100 billion has been wiped out in the last 12 hours.

Crypto enthusiasts have reacted to his post with some saying that the decline was expected and they were loaded on shorts. Another crypto enthusiast said that it was just liquidation, which was a normal market cleanup.

Decline in Crypto Market

The decline of the crypto market is more than evident, with several tokens losing momentum in just 24 hours. The market cap has shed almost 2.82% of its value and is now hovering around $3.13 trillion. The CMC20 Index has slipped to $195.57, down by 2.80%. The FGI, earlier moving above 50 points, has plunged to 45 points when the article is being written.

As for the price of top tokens, BTC and ETH are down by 2.33% and 3.01% over the last 24 hours, respectively. They are now exchanging hands at $92,793.11 and $3,206.69, applicable in the same order. Interestingly, the crypto market has retraced its steps at a time when investors are allocating funds to Gold and Silver amid rising international trade tensions.

Factors Behind this Bloody Monday

Several factors have influenced the price on Monday. The most talked about factor is the recent tariff threat by US President Donald Trump. He has vowed to impose tariffs on eight European countries till he is allowed to buy Greenland, which Trump says is for national security. An initial imposition could be of 10% effective February 01, likely to be hiked to 25% effective June 01, 2026, if both don’t reach a deal.

Eight countries facing the possible tariff rate are Norway, Denmark, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Britain, and Finland. Not just crypto but most of the global markets recorded a decline. DAX Futures and EUROSTOXX 50 Futures plunged by around 1.1% while Japan’s Nikkei lost 1%.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Solana (SOL) Tumbles 6%: Can Bulls Halt the Freefall, or Do Bears Truly Hold the Reins?

TagsCrypto AnalystCrypto Market

Related Questions

QWhat is the 'Bloody Monday' factor mentioned by the crypto analyst?

AThe 'Bloody Monday' factor refers to the significant market decline that occurred on Monday, where nearly $100 billion was wiped out from the crypto market in just 12 hours, as highlighted by analyst Ted Pillows.

QHow much has the total crypto market cap decreased according to the article?

AThe crypto market cap has decreased by almost 2.82%, now hovering around $3.13 trillion.

QWhat are the current prices of BTC and ETH after the decline?

ABTC is currently priced at $92,793.11 (down 2.33%) and ETH is at $3,206.69 (down 3.01%) over the last 24 hours.

QWhat major event is cited as a key factor influencing the market decline?

AThe recent tariff threat by US President Donald Trump against eight European countries, with proposed tariffs starting at 10% effective February 01 and potentially rising to 25% by June 01, 2026, if no deal is reached.

QWhich countries are facing potential tariffs according to the article?

AThe eight countries facing potential tariffs are Norway, Denmark, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Britain, and Finland.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit16m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit16m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit31m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片