Conversation with CoinGecko CEO: Building a Crypto Data Platform from Scratch with $200, Regularly Evaluating Acquisition Intentions

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-15Last updated on 2026-03-15

Abstract

Bobby Ong, co-founder and CEO of CoinGecko, built the cryptocurrency data platform from scratch with just $200 over 12 years, without venture capital. In a recent interview, he shared his journey into crypto in 2013, driven by an economics background and interest in Bitcoin's fixed supply and self-custody model. He remains optimistic about NFTs, viewing them as essential for tokenizing real-world assets, though he believes future crypto winners have yet to emerge. Ong discussed CoinGecko’s origins, including its name choice for being adaptable and fun, and highlighted the 2021 DeFi boom as a key growth driver, as the platform was early to track DeFi tokens. He explained the company’s decision to avoid VC funding, which fostered creativity and disciplined, low-cost marketing like SEO optimization. When comparing CoinGecko to competitor CoinMarketCap, Ong acknowledged CoinMarketCap’s stronger SEO due to earlier market entry but emphasized CoinGecko’s broader token coverage and data accuracy. He also addressed rumors about a potential $500 million sale, stating that while CoinGecko regularly evaluates strategic options, including acquisitions, there is no perfect timing for such decisions—it depends on the team and circumstances.

Source: When Shift Happens

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

Bobby Ong is the co-founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency data platform CoinGecko, which he built from scratch with $200 over 12 years without venture capital.

In the podcast, Bobby shared his personal experience and entrepreneurial journey, believing that CoinMarketCap's only advantage over CoinGecko is SEO, and responded to rumors of "selling at a $500 million valuation." The following are the highlights of the conversation.

Self-taught programming, entered the crypto field in 2013

Host: TM Lee was the CEO of CoinGecko for so many years. Why did you decide to swap roles with him?

Bobby Ong: Because both the crypto market and the company have reached a turning point. In the early days, it was like the "Wild West," but now large banks and institutions are entering, and the industry is changing for the better. Secondly, after 10 years of growth, CoinGecko has nearly 100 employees, and management direction requires leveraging different strengths. TM (former CEO) is a technical genius at heart. He now serves as president, focusing more on 0-to-1 R&D. I have taken over as CEO, responsible for the overall vision, operations, and direction, each playing to our strengths.

Host: What attracted you to the crypto field in 2013?

Bobby Ong: I have a background in economics. I studied economics at University College London, one of the best universities in the world for learning about money. I spent three years studying money, right after the big financial crisis. I was in university from 2009 to 2012, learning about bank runs, interest rate setting, federal deposit insurance, etc. However, after graduation, I saw the phenomenon of "negative interest rates" in reality, which shattered my understanding of textbook economics. So I quickly threw my university textbooks in the trash.

After graduation, I taught myself programming and spent a lot of time on tech forums. I learned about Bitcoin on the Hacker News forum. After reading the whitepaper, I tried to buy some Bitcoin. A few days later, the Bitcoin arrived, and I withdrew it to a self-custody wallet.

What really struck me at the time was: this is money I control myself. The money in your bank account isn't really yours; if the bank fails, your money is gone. What interested me more was Bitcoin's money supply: only 21 million coins, with a fixed supply. At that time, quantitative easing was happening, and the government was printing money to devalue the dollar. Who knows if the rules will change again in the future?

So the narrative of having hard money, digital gold, was very solid: the rules are written in stone and hard to change (unless everyone agrees). Also, in war-torn countries, many assets are real estate; you can't take them across the border, but Bitcoin can be carried in your pocket. For many people, this is a life-changing thing. Most of these traits still hold true today, even more so. So I think the foundation of cryptocurrency hasn't changed over the years.

Still bullish on NFTs, the big winners of future assets have yet to emerge

Host: What's the story with Pudgy Penguins?

Bobby Ong: One day I received an email saying they wanted me to invest in Pudgy Penguins. I am a big fan of NFTs. I had a call with Luca Netz and invested an amount. What I didn't know at the time was that Luca had been rejected by many VCs. I just wanted to support a fellow entrepreneur. He would be a winner in this space. I didn't know he faced so many challenges. For me, it was clear, but I guess not everyone had the same vision.

Host: What are your thoughts on NFTs in 2026?

Bobby Ong: Still bullish on NFTs. In this world of billions of tokens, a large portion will be non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Although NFTs seem to be in a downturn now, they will come back at some point. The vast majority of assets in the real world (such as real estate, contracts) are inherently non-fungible, and NFT technology is the inevitable choice for putting these assets on-chain.

Host: Who will be the winners of future asset appreciation?

Bobby Ong: I think it's something that hasn't appeared yet. Look at the tech industry: in 2000, you couldn't have imagined Uber or Airbnb. The Uber and Airbnb of crypto haven't arrived yet. Nowadays, companies grow to 1 billion users or $1 billion much faster than before. Old assets won't die; Bitcoin will always be around. But will Pudgy Penguins still be around in 5 years? Will CryptoPunks still be around? Who knows.

CryptoPunks is the first NFT series and may have historical artistic value. Pudgy Penguins ultimately depends on the team's execution. But there will always be new things in crypto, so you have to stay agile.

The DeFi explosion in 2021 was a turning point for the company

Host: Why the name CoinGecko? What was the early startup phase like?

Bobby Ong: In April 2014, I co-founded CoinGecko with TM Lee. At that time, crypto companies usually had very serious names like Coinbase or CoinDesk, but we wanted to use an animal name to add fun. We chose "Gecko" because geckos are adaptable, extremely fast, and widespread. We considered "CoinTeddy," but obviously, no one likes the bearish implication of "bear market."

In the first five years of the startup, to mitigate risk and fulfill a scholarship contract, I worked full-time in digital marketing until the crypto market exploded at the end of 2017, when I went full-time into CoinGecko. At that time, CoinGecko was extremely rudimentary, just a simple domain and basic server, scraping prices and social media data for a few hundred tokens, with almost no visual design.

Host: What was the turning point in development?

Bobby Ong: The turning point was the DeFi explosion in 2021. We did a lot that year, the most important being tracking the DeFi market. At that time, mainstream platforms didn't value long-tail assets on DEXs, while CoinGecko, by fully integrating on-chain data, tracked all DeFi tokens and gained a large number of users. At that time, CoinGecko was the only platform that could track these coins. We were ahead by 6-12 months, solidifying our position as the "go-to destination for crypto data."

No funding, forcing low-cost creative marketing

Host: Why not take VC money?

Bobby Ong: Early on, we talked to VCs, but no one really understood what cryptocurrency was, especially VCs here in Malaysia. Then we also went to the US. I talked to some people at Stanford and some in Silicon Valley, but they were a bit dismissive, thinking that making money from ads definitely wouldn't work. Well, if the Silicon Valley people themselves couldn't see it, there was nothing to be done. Of course, there must have been some VCs in Silicon Valley paying attention to this field.

We always kept operations lean. Bootstrapping was also interesting, like an experiment to see how far we could go without funding. I think not having financial resources was a creative constraint. It was a limitation we set for ourselves. The benefit was that no VCs forced us to spend at all costs to grow, but on the other hand, we had no cash.

So, how should we promote ourselves? How to do marketing? How to let the world know about CoinGecko without so much money? I couldn't go to conferences everywhere, sponsor parties, etc. I had to find low-cost, creative ways to promote us. This actually made our marketing team more disciplined. Optimizing search engine (SEO) was one important way we achieved growth at very low cost. Additionally, there were many other methods to help us grow quickly.

Host: What advice do you have on fundraising?

Bobby Ong: If you want to grow fast, go raise funds. But if you accept a slower pace of development, then you don't necessarily need to raise funds; you can develop at your own pace and control your own destiny. The benefit of not raising from VCs is that we never had to write any investor reports and didn't face any pressure from VCs.

If you need to grow fast or need to validate an idea, then raise funds. But it is advised to raise enough to reach a certain level and push the company to the next stage. However, raising too much money too early is not good because eventually, you will have too much money and lack discipline. You might have countless ways to squander the money, leading to over-hiring or doing all sorts of ridiculous things.

CoinMarketCap is strong in SEO, regularly evaluating investment choices

Host: How should users choose between CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko?

Bobby Ong: You need to understand the game rules of these two companies and how it affects users. We do what we think is good for the community and strive to provide users with the right data. Many users first discover CoinMarketCap through SEO, but after using it for a while, they find that CoinGecko's data is more accurate, covers more coins, and we have also started building Gecko Terminal, which includes even more coins, including all tokens on various DEXs on-chain. Many developers using our API also realize that reliability, accuracy, and uptime are stronger.

There are also subtle differences, like metadata, how we manage listings, how we check for updated information, etc. Ordinary users might not notice these, but industry insiders can immediately see the difference between CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap and the work we do.

Host: Where is CoinMarketCap stronger than CoinGecko?

Bobby Ong: They are definitely stronger than us in SEO. They started 11 months earlier than us, and they got a lot of media coverage. Generally, media coverage brings a lot of backlinks, which helps improve SEO ranking. Then, when journalists want to write an article next time, they search for the token, find CoinMarketCap, and start writing. So they built a virtuous cycle. We have been trying to surpass them in SEO, but it's not easy. This is one of their advantages; they have a very strong position in the existing market.

Host: There have been recent rumors that CoinGecko might sell for $500 million. What are your thoughts on this?

Bobby Ong: CoinGecko is a profitable, independent, and bootstrapped company. We often evaluate our strategic options, like whether to raise funds in the early stages. The discussion now might be slightly different because the industry is constantly changing. We are looking for opportunities, seeing what's on the market, seeing what choices there are, and then seeing how best to position CoinGecko to make it better, stronger, and provide the best products and services for our users and customers in the coming years. We don't comment on specific cases like this, but what I mean is, we regularly evaluate various options.

Host: When is the best time to sell?

Bobby Ong: There is never a so-called best time to sell. Timing also depends somewhat on luck. Ultimately, it depends on the co-founders, founders, or founding team, and what is right. And, ultimately, companies are acquired, not sold.

Related reading: CoinGecko seeks sale: The end of the era of independent crypto data

Related Questions

QWhat was the initial investment and funding strategy for CoinGecko, as shared by CEO Bobby Ong?

ABobby Ong started CoinGecko with an initial investment of $200 and built it over 12 years without any venture capital funding. The company has been self-funded and profitable, allowing it to operate independently and avoid external pressure from investors.

QAccording to Bobby Ong, what is the main advantage that CoinMarketCap has over CoinGecko?

ABobby Ong stated that CoinMarketCap's main advantage over CoinGecko is its superior Search Engine Optimization (SEO). They started 11 months earlier and received extensive media coverage, which generated many backlinks and helped them establish a strong position in search rankings.

QWhat does Bobby Ong identify as the turning point for CoinGecko's growth and why?

AThe turning point for CoinGecko was the DeFi explosion in 2021. CoinGecko was the first platform to comprehensively track DeFi tokens from various decentralized exchanges (DEXs), giving it a 6-12 month lead over competitors and solidifying its position as the go-to destination for crypto data.

QHow does Bobby Ong view the future of NFTs and which type of assets does he believe will be the big winners?

ABobby Ong remains bullish on NFTs, believing that a significant portion of the multi-billion token world will be non-fungible tokens (NFTs). He thinks the big winners in future asset appreciation have not yet emerged, comparing it to how tech giants like Uber and Airbnb were unknown in 2000, and emphasizes that the crypto space will continue to innovate with new projects.

QWhat is Bobby Ong's response to the rumor about CoinGecko potentially being sold for $500 million?

ABobby Ong did not confirm the specific rumor but stated that CoinGecko is a profitable, independent, and self-funded company. He mentioned that they regularly evaluate strategic options, including potential acquisitions, to position CoinGecko for future growth and better serve their users and clients, but they do not comment on specific cases.

Related Reads

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit35m ago

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit35m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit42m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit42m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手44m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手44m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手1h ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片