Community is Dead, Long Live Community

链捕手Published on 2026-05-15Last updated on 2026-05-15

Abstract

The author reflects on the transformative and often painful evolution of crypto communities. They nostalgically recall the early days of Web3, where genuine bonds formed around shared beliefs in projects like DeFi and NFTs, leading to deep friendships and passionate collaboration. However, the essay argues this authentic "community" is now largely dead. It has been corrupted by a culture of extraction, where most participants in modern Discord servers are motivated solely by financial gain—grinding for points, chasing airdrops, and immediately selling tokens. This dynamic creates a facade of engagement that vanishes after a token launch, often replaced by hostility. The author uses their project, Across Protocol, as a case study, announcing the shutdown of its Discord server because it no longer represents a true community but a toxic space dominated by mercenary actors. The piece concludes with a bittersweet farewell to the old era and a determined call to continue building with the few remaining genuine believers. The title's paradox, "Community is dead. Long live community," mourns the loss of the original ideal while expressing hope for its future revival.

Author: jamesrichardfry, Head of Marketing, Across Protocol

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

I've been struggling with how to write this. Part of me wants to sugarcoat it. Dress it up in marketing speak. Frame it as something beautiful and move on.

But that wouldn't be entirely honest. If you know me, you know I wear my heart on my sleeve and I'm incapable of lying. So here it is, bluntly.

Community is dead. Of course, it wasn't always this way. That goes without saying, but I'm saying it out loud anyway.

I still miss the good old days on Clubhouse and Discord chatrooms. The times we spent hours "vibing" with people from across the internet about magic internet money, the latest NFT drop, the best staking opportunities, complaining about the money we lost, dreaming about the next great project, and actually *building*.

To this day, I'm still good friends with many of those people. Some have even become friends in real life. When community is good, it's good. I miss those days.

Zooming out a bit, what is community? I talked about this for way too long during a recent all-hands meeting, and I could almost hear the eyes rolling from my colleagues.

To share a bit of that epiphany with you, here's my take on community:

A community is a group of people gathered around a shared interest. In many aspects of our daily lives, we have community.

From the school you go to, the sport you play, the religion you practice, the gym you frequent, even the grocery store you shop at.

Some communities are shallow. The group of old men I see at the gym Monday through Friday is a community, but it's clearly very different from the friend circle community we intentionally spend time with.

Web3 or crypto community is no different.

We all gathered around our shared interests. DeFi summer. NFT mania. NFT winter. Cross-chain interoperability whatever. Zero-knowledge proofs whatever.

Whatever you're into, there's a group of people diving down the rabbit hole with you.

Some were there for the financial speculation. Others, from a deep belief and commitment to the early cypherpunk movement. Some crypto communities were surface-level or perfunctory.

Others were deeply profound. I mean, deeply, deeply profound. Like a religious congregation, fanatic following, belief-in-your-gut, put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is profound.

We wore the same "clothes" (PFP), spoke our own language (WAGMI), looked crazy to outsiders, and we didn't care one bit because we believed in what we were all gathering to pursue.

Early crypto community was inseparable from belief.

Not just belief, but a deep, gut-wrenching conviction that gave you the courage to get on stage and talk for hours in front of hundreds about why you believed in the founder, the project, the roadmap, and why you were the project's diamond-handed hodler.

Conviction. That's what drove the parabolic growth in the early days. Without community, crypto would be nothing.

Across, by the way, was no exception. The early days of the Across community were the golden days. The vibes were high. There was deep conviction (yes, I'm repeating that word). Excitement, energy, people genuinely caring about the project for the innovation, not for the token price.

We hired people from that community who are still with us today. And some of the early people who stuck around are still die-hard community members, riding the waves with us.

When community is good, it's good.

And then, everything changed.

Fast forward to today. I'm going to make some sweeping generalizations here. Please know that I'm not referring to "all" community members, "every" community group, and not painting with a broad brush. But if I continue to be blunt, I'm referring to most. Vast majority.

The word "community" has been bastardized by the crypto "extractors." In many ways, if you want to know why "the love of money is the root of all evil," look no further than the countless Discord "communities."

Thousands of unread messages a day. Impressive daily active users. Constant social support, until the Token Generation Event (TGE) hits. We all know the playbook.

The vibe before TGE mimics the early crypto community sentiment. Deep conviction. Gut-wrenching fire. Courage to get on stage. PFP and project tags in bios. Ride or die, diamond hands, bullish hodler.

Then, everyone changes.

You go to sleep one night, barely able to keep up with the Discord notifications.

You wake up the next morning, and it's a ghost town.

Or worse.

You find your loyal "community" coming at you with pitchforks and torches.

Over the airdrop.

You see, "community" is no longer community.

It's devolved into endless, AI-generated spam to farm points, for the hope of an airdrop, to immediately dump, then complain about the token price, and call the project a scam or rug (which, to be fair, is often true).

You know where I'm going with this long-winded rant, right?

"Community" is no longer community. You know it. You feel it. The timeline feels off. Discord servers feel off. Podcasts feel off. Twitter Spaces feel off.

Everything feels wrong, like "Con" will never be "Confucius." Everyone reading this today knows it deep down, even if you've never articulated it this clearly before.

Today's "community" is a cheap imitation of the early community that built crypto into what it is. The shared interest of these "community" members boils down to one thing. Extraction. Quick. Decisive. Extraction. It's the poison that kills what crypto could have been, and should have been.

Most of today's (again, not all) Discord "communities" consist of the dregs of the remnants.

Some are genuine loyalists and believers. (To those who have stuck with Across, we wouldn't be here without you. Thank you. You know where to find us, we'll always have a place for you.)

Some, often the majority, are there to extract from the project. I won't dwell on that here.

And finally, those who only appear to complain. Because in every bear market, these specific types of "community" members will kick you when you're down, as if the bear market hasn't affected every team member, and as if we caused the bear market to happen.

Unfortunately, the Across Discord has recently fallen into this "majority" category as well. Our "community" has become something else.

The people who recognize the incredible achievements we've made, the progress Across has pioneered for the entire industry, and who still support us, are tired of being part of this extractive "community" and have left the Discord.

The few who remain will happily move with us to Twitter and other channels. The rest are what I defined above as "community." Yes, I'm saying this with gut-wrenching fire and deep conviction.

Therefore, today, the Across Discord is moving to read-only mode.

This is the first step in our planned, full shutdown of the server.

To the community of believers still standing with us, let's keep building. We have a lot of work to do.

To Discord, thank you for hosting some of the good old days of crypto. I will cherish them forever.

Community is dead.

Long live community.

Related Questions

QAccording to the author, what is the core difference between early crypto communities and today's so-called 'communities'?

AThe author argues that the core difference lies in the underlying motive. Early crypto communities were driven by a deep, shared belief and passion for the technology and vision. Today's 'communities' are primarily driven by extraction - the desire to farm points, earn airdrops, sell tokens immediately for profit, and then often turn hostile towards the project. They are characterized as cheap knock-offs of the genuine early communities.

QWhat specific action is the author announcing for the Across Protocol Discord server, and why?

AThe author announces that the Across Protocol Discord server will be set to read-only mode, which is the first step in a planned full shutdown. The reason is that their Discord has been overrun by the 'extractive' majority, driving away the genuine, loyal community members. The noise and negativity no longer serve the project's builders and true believers.

QHow does the author define a 'community' in the broader sense, beyond just web3?

AThe author defines a community as a group of people gathered around a shared interest. They provide examples from everyday life such as school, sports, religion, the gym, or even a local grocery store. The author notes that communities can be shallow (like nodding acquaintances at the gym) or deep and meaningful (like close friend groups).

QWhat positive aspects of the early 'golden era' of crypto communities does the author miss?

AThe author misses the authentic 'vibing' on platforms like Clubhouse and Discord, where people discussed crypto topics out of genuine interest, shared experiences, dreamed up new projects, and collaboratively 'built' things. These interactions were based on excitement, innovation, and a shared belief in the project's potential, not just token price. Many real friendships were formed during this time.

QWhat is the primary 'poison' that the author believes has killed the potential of what crypto communities could have been?

AThe author identifies 'extraction' as the primary poison. The current environment is dominated by individuals whose sole common interest is to quickly and decisively extract value from projects through activities like airdrop farming, followed by selling tokens and complaining. This self-serving behavior has corrupted the genuine communal spirit.

Related Reads

Walsh's Hearing Debut, 'New Fed Insider': Emphasizes Zero Tolerance for High Inflation but No Hint on Interest Rate Path

Federal Reserve Chairman Wash's inaugural congressional monetary policy hearing delivered his "new Fed policy declaration," avoiding any clear signals on future interest rate moves—whether cuts or hikes—that the market sought. Instead, he consistently emphasized the Fed's commitment to restoring price stability, maintaining central bank independence, and pledged full advance communication for any future adjustments to the balance sheet. Nick Timiraos, often called the "new Fed whisperer," noted that Wash deliberately avoided hinting at future rate paths, focusing the hearing on reaffirming the Fed's long-term goal of controlling inflation. This stance persisted even after the release of a lower-than-expected June CPI report just before the hearing, which Wash downplayed, stating he did not view the inflation mission as accomplished. Timiraos observed that Wash refrained from using the data to signal any policy inclination, instead stressing that the Fed would rely on economic data to decide how to use its policy tools—interest rates and the balance sheet—to achieve price stability. Bloomberg's analysis suggested the hearing outlined the framework of the "new Fed": upholding monetary policy independence, adhering to the 2% inflation target, rejecting the notion of a trade-off between employment and inflation, and leaving room for future balance sheet and governance reforms. Wash asserted that restoring price stability is foundational for sustained economic growth and job creation, denying any "cruel choice" between the two mandates. Regarding balance sheet reform, a key agenda item, Wash declined to prejudge an ongoing working group's conclusions but promised ample advance communication to the market to prevent sudden disruptions, reaffirming that the balance sheet should serve monetary policy, not fiscal functions. He also strongly defended the Fed's operational independence from political influence, which received positive remarks from some lawmakers across party lines. In summary, Wash's testimony did not alter the near-term interest rate outlook but reinforced a "data-dependent" communication framework. The focus remains on achieving price stability, with future policy actions hinging on incoming economic data rather than a preset path, while the Fed continues its internal reforms and emphasizes transparent communication to manage market expectations.

marsbit2m ago

Walsh's Hearing Debut, 'New Fed Insider': Emphasizes Zero Tolerance for High Inflation but No Hint on Interest Rate Path

marsbit2m ago

10000 Hours of Human Data, Trains the World's First Whole-Body Mobile Manipulation Implicit World-Action Model

"Being-M0.7" is the world's first latent world-action model for whole-body mobile manipulation in humanoid robots, developed by Zhi Zai Wu Jie (Beyond Being). Trained on over 10,000 hours of human-centric multimodal data, it aims to overcome key industry challenges: the high cost and scarcity of real robot demonstration data, the computational inefficiency of pixel-level video prediction models, and the lack of full-body coordination in existing approaches. The model is based on a Vision-Motion Mixture-of-Transformers (MoT) architecture, which allows training on a mixture of paired video-motion data, pure video data, and pure motion sequences. A key design is a unified motion representation that bridges human and robot morphology, enabling knowledge transfer from vast human behavioral data to specific robot control. After pre-training on human data, the model is adapted to a real robot (Unitree G1) using a small amount of teleoperated demonstration data via a lightweight "Action Expert" module. This process decouples low-frequency world planning from high-frequency motion control. The model was tested in four challenging real-world demos: fishing a toy fish from water (liquid interaction), retrieving an object using a mirror (visual reasoning), a multi-step pick-and-place task, and obstacle avoidance while carrying a box. In comparative tests against other models, Being-M0.7 showed stronger performance in tasks requiring indirect reasoning and full-body coordination. This work represents a shift in humanoid robotics competition from hardware spectacle to model capabilities rooted in scalable data and training paradigms, using human experience as a foundation for physical world understanding and action.

marsbit11m ago

10000 Hours of Human Data, Trains the World's First Whole-Body Mobile Manipulation Implicit World-Action Model

marsbit11m ago

A Year Later, 'Lean Ethereum' Moves Forward: What Is Ethereum Aiming to Achieve?

A year after its initial proposal, "Lean Ethereum" is resurfacing as a core focus, signaling a potential fundamental shift in Ethereum's development narrative. While recent years prioritized scalability (e.g., Rollups, blobs), current discussions center on long-term sustainability and decentralization. This shift is evident on multiple fronts. Organizationally, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) is becoming "leaner and more focused," while key responsibilities like R&D (Ethlabs) and institutional outreach (Ethereum Institution) are being distributed to independent organizations. This aims to reduce systemic reliance on a single entity. Technologically, "Lean Ethereum," described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's "third major iteration," outlines a 3-4 year roadmap. Its goals extend beyond raw throughput to emphasize protocol properties for a "long-term trust infrastructure." Key directions include: protocol simplification via "light verification" (using recursive STARKs instead of heavy re-execution); prioritizing quantum resistance; integrating privacy as a first-class protocol goal; and consensus-layer improvements for faster finality and reduced validator burden. Complementing this, the proposed 0x02 compounding validators feature seeks to make staking rewards more sustainable and equitable for smaller participants by allowing native reinvestment, improving capital efficiency and reducing network overhead. Together, these changes represent a move towards "subtraction": reducing dependency on centralized organizations, the cost for individuals to verify the chain, and capital inefficiencies in network participation. The aim is a more decentralized, verifiable, and resilient Ethereum capable of supporting the next decade of growth, even if the tangible benefits of these foundational shifts may take years to fully materialize.

marsbit34m ago

A Year Later, 'Lean Ethereum' Moves Forward: What Is Ethereum Aiming to Achieve?

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片