CertiK Annual Security Report: Web3 Losses Increase 37% Year-on-Year in 2025, Phishing Attacks and Supply Chain Incidents Emerge as Major Threats

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-25Last updated on 2025-12-25

Abstract

CertiK's 2025 Skynet Hack3D Security Report reveals that the Web3 industry suffered approximately $3.35 billion in losses across 630 security incidents, a 37% increase from 2024. While the number of incidents decreased by 137, the average loss per attack surged by 66.6% to $5.32 million, indicating a trend toward targeting high-value assets. The most significant losses resulted from supply chain attacks, which accounted for nearly half of the total losses ($1.45 billion) despite only two recorded incidents. The largest was the February Bybit breach, where attackers compromised a third-party multi-signature wallet service to bypass security protocols. Phishing remained the most frequent threat, with 248 incidents causing $723 million in losses. The report warns that AI is amplifying these attacks by generating highly convincing fake websites and targeted scam messages, making traditional defenses less effective. Amid growing risks, regulatory clarity is improving globally, with advancements in U.S. stablecoin legislation and frameworks like MiCA in the EU. Security is shifting from a reactive cost to a core infrastructure element. The report concludes that projects embedding security into their design and development will be better positioned for the future.

On December 23, CertiK, the world's largest Web3 security company, released the "2025 Skynet Hack3D Web3 Security Report," systematically outlining the major security incidents and risk trends in the Web3 space over the past year. The report indicates that while the Web3 industry is accelerating its development amid a recovering market environment and clearer regulatory expectations, security risks have not eased and continue to pose systemic security threats.

The report shows that in 2025, the Web3 space experienced 630 security incidents, resulting in total losses of approximately $3.35 billion, a 37% year-on-year increase compared to 2024. Although the number of incidents decreased by 137 compared to the previous year, the average loss per attack reached $5.322 million, a sharp increase of 66.6%, highlighting the trend of attackers targeting high-value objectives.

Supply Chain Attacks Drive Annual Losses Higher

In terms of attack types, supply chain attacks became the largest source of losses in 2025. Despite only two recorded incidents throughout the year, the cumulative losses amounted to $1.45 billion, accounting for nearly half of the total annual losses. The majority of these losses stemmed from the Bybit incident in February.

According to the report, the security incident experienced by Bybit in February 2025 resulted in approximately $1.4 billion in losses, making it one of the largest cryptocurrency thefts to date. The attackers did not directly breach the exchange's system but instead infiltrated the developer environment of a third-party multi-signature wallet service provider, embedding malicious code in the signing process to bypass multiple approval mechanisms.

CertiK noted in the report that such incidents reflect attackers increasingly focusing their resources on critical service providers and underlying tools rather than individual protocols, underscoring that supply chain security has become an unavoidable systemic risk.

High Frequency of Phishing Attacks, AI Acts as an "Amplifier"

In terms of attack frequency, phishing remained the most common security threat in 2025. The report shows that a total of 248 phishing attack incidents were recorded throughout the year, resulting in approximately $723 million in losses, slightly higher than the number of code vulnerability attacks (240 incidents).

Notably, CertiK believes this figure may still be an underestimate. A significant number of phishing and scam incidents targeting individual users were not formally disclosed, especially those involving smaller losses or off-chain social engineering attacks.

The report emphasizes that the proliferation of artificial intelligence is significantly lowering the technical barriers to phishing attacks. Attackers are increasingly using AI to generate highly realistic phishing websites, wallet pop-ups, and multilingual scam messages, combined with on-chain data and social media content for "precision targeting." Traditional defense methods relying on grammatical errors or template features for identification are gradually becoming ineffective.

Regulatory Clarity Increases, Security Shifts from "Cost Item" to "Infrastructure"

Amid rising risks, the report also notes positive changes in the global regulatory environment. Legislative progress in the U.S. around stablecoins and digital asset transparency has sent clearer policy signals to the industry. Regulatory frameworks such as the EU's MiCA, Singapore's regulatory sandbox, and Hong Kong's initiatives are also pushing Web3 toward a more standardized development phase.

CertiK pointed out in the report that as institutional and compliant funds continue to enter the space, security capabilities are transitioning from "post-incident remediation" to an infrastructure element in project design and operations. For both project teams and individual users, security is no longer optional but a critical factor affecting long-term viability.

The report concludes by projecting that in the coming year, AI-driven impersonation attacks, increasingly complex supply chain intrusions, and social engineering attacks targeting individual users will continue to evolve. In this context, projects that embed security into architectural design, development processes, and user experience are more likely to stand out in the next wave of Web3 competition.

Full report: https://indd.adobe.com/view/6935ac85-c644-4048-9e27-1d310549aa0a

Related Questions

QAccording to CertiK's 2025 report, what was the total financial loss in the Web3 sector and what was the year-over-year percentage increase?

AThe total financial loss in the Web3 sector was approximately $3.35 billion, representing a 37% year-over-year increase compared to 2024.

QWhich type of attack was identified as the largest source of loss in 2025, and what was a key characteristic of the Bybit incident?

ASupply chain attacks were the largest source of loss. A key characteristic of the Bybit incident was that attackers did not directly breach the exchange's system but instead compromised a third-party multi-signature wallet service provider's developer environment to inject malicious code.

QWhat was the most frequent type of attack in 2025, and how is AI impacting this threat?

APhishing attacks were the most frequent, with 248 recorded incidents. AI is acting as an 'amplifier' by lowering the technical barrier, enabling attackers to create highly realistic phishing sites, wallet pop-ups, and multi-language scam messages for 'precision targeting'.

QHow did the average loss per attack change in 2025, and what does this trend indicate?

AThe average loss per attack reached $5.322 million, a sharp increase of 66.6% year-over-year. This trend highlights that attackers are concentrating their efforts on higher-value targets.

QHow is the role of security changing for Web3 projects according to the report's view on the evolving regulatory landscape?

AWith clearer regulations and more institutional capital entering the space, security is shifting from being a 'cost item' and 'remedial measure' to a fundamental 'infrastructure' element that is integrated into project design and operations, crucial for long-term viability.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit29m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit29m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit29m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit29m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit39m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片