Cardano erases 100% of election rally gains – Can ADA hold top 10?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-20Last updated on 2025-12-20

Abstract

Cardano (ADA) has erased all its gains from the election-driven bull run, falling back to the $0.30 support level. Its market cap has dropped 64% in 2025, a steeper decline than even Dogecoin. Weak fundamentals accompany this technical weakness: active addresses have plummeted, and its TVL is significantly overshadowed by smaller-cap competitors like Sui. Whale selling of 120 million ADA has added to the selling pressure. With its user engagement, TVL, and market performance all signaling overvaluation, ADA's position as the 10th-largest cryptocurrency is at serious risk of being overtaken by Bitcoin Cash (BCH).

It’s been over a year since the election cycle kicked off a bull run.

Even with all the FUD, macro uncertainty, and back-to-back flash crashes, most altcoins have managed to hold onto their election-rally gains, meaning long-term holders are still sitting on unrealized profits.

Cardano [ADA], though, hasn’t shared that resilience. After a red Q3 and Q4, ADA has slid back to its early election levels, wiping out 100% of its yearly gains and returning to a key technical area near the $0.30 support.

Notably, that weakness is clearly reflected in its market cap.

According to CoinMarketCap, ADA has shed $25 billion in 2025, translating to a 64% drop, pulling its valuation down to $14 billion.

For comparison, even Dogecoin [DOGE] has managed to cap its drawdown at 50%.

Simply put, ADA has underperformed even a memecoin.

Against this backdrop, and with the market-cap gap between Cardano and Bitcoin Cash [BCH] narrowing by the day, the question becomes: How long before ADA loses its 10th spot in the crypto rankings to BCH?

Weak fundamentals put ADA’s ranking at risk

ADA’s technical weakness is now spilling over into fundamentals.

Despite recent network upgrades, user engagement has been flat. According to DeFiLlama, active addresses on Cardano, which jumped to 93k during the election, have slid back below 25k, keeping FOMO muted.

At the same time, analysts are pointing to Sui [SUI], whose TVL is 4.5x Cardano’s despite having roughly one-third of ADA’s market cap. This discrepancy signals that Cardano may be overvalued relative to its peers.

Notably, smart money is starting to feel the squeeze too.

Analysts point out that whales have offloaded 120 million ADA in the past two months, coinciding with ADA’s roughly 50% drop from its $0.80 peak. This also highlights Cardano’s struggle to hold $0.80 as support.

Taken together, weak FOMO, falling TVL, technical weakness, and shaky fundamentals all indicate that Cardano overvalues itself. In this setup, it’s likely just a matter of time before ADA loses its 10th spot.


Final Thoughts

  • Cardano has underperformed most altcoins, losing all election-cycle gains, with weak user activity, stagnant TVL, and muted FOMO signaling technical and fundamental weakness.
  • Whale selling and overvaluation concerns suggest Cardano’s 10th spot in crypto rankings is increasingly at risk.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason Cardano (ADA) is at risk of losing its top 10 cryptocurrency ranking?

ACardano is at risk due to its significant underperformance, erasing all election-cycle gains, combined with weak user engagement, stagnant Total Value Locked (TVL), whale selling, and concerns that it is overvalued compared to peers like Sui (SUI).

QHow much has Cardano's market cap dropped in 2025, and what is its current valuation?

ACardano's market cap has shed $25 billion in 2025, which is a 64% drop, pulling its current valuation down to $14 billion.

QTo what key technical support level has ADA's price returned after its decline?

AADA's price has returned to a key technical area near the $0.30 support level.

QWhat metric is used to show that user engagement on the Cardano network has decreased significantly?

AActive addresses on Cardano, which jumped to 93k during the election rally, have slid back below 25k, indicating a significant decrease in user engagement.

QWhich cryptocurrency is mentioned as a direct competitor threatening to overtake Cardano's market cap ranking?

ABitcoin Cash (BCH) is the direct competitor, as the market-cap gap between Cardano and Bitcoin Cash is narrowing by the day, putting ADA's 10th spot at risk.

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit6m ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit6m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手6m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手6m ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

The article discusses the immense popularity of the "2x Long SK Hynix ETF" (07709.HK) in Hong Kong, which became the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF by May 2026. Launched in October 2025, the ETF's net value soared over 1000% in seven months, significantly outperforming the 324% gain of SK Hynix's underlying stock, driven by the AI boom and a critical shift in industry demand from computing power to memory. It highlights the mechanics and risks of daily-rebalanced leveraged ETFs. In a smooth bullish market, they generate amplified returns, but during volatile periods—exemplified by market swings during geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz in March-April 2026—they suffer severe "volatility decay," where choppy price action can cause losses far exceeding twice the drop of the underlying asset. The piece frames SK Hynix, as NVIDIA's primary HBM supplier, within the classic cycle of the memory chip industry—a commoditized sector prone to boom-and-bust cycles of shortage, price hikes, overcapacity, and crashes. While current AI-driven demand and high margins (Q1 2026毛利率~79%) create a "super cycle," the article questions its sustainability. It warns that extreme profits will inevitably tempt competitors like Samsung and Micron to ramp up HBM production, potentially eroding scarcity. Furthermore, the entire narrative remains tethered to the massive AI capital expenditure of tech giants. In conclusion, the ETF's trajectory symbolizes the accelerated, all-in nature of the current AI revolution, where timeframes are compressed and market moves are extreme. However, it also underscores that while industry trends define ultimate returns, macro-geopolitical risks dictate the volatile and uncertain path to get there.

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片