Caldera Launches Metalayer Token Launcher

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-04-08Last updated on 2026-04-08

Abstract

Caldera has officially launched the Metalayer Token Launcher, the first no-code solution for cross-chain token deployment. This tool enables projects to quickly create and deploy MetaTokens without the need to write smart contracts or perform complex technical configurations. Users can set the token name, total supply, and Treasury wallet address to complete token creation and deployment within minutes, significantly lowering the technical barriers to launching on-chain economic systems. In its initial phase, the Metalayer Token Launcher will support both Arbitrum and Ethereum, featuring near real-time cross-chain bridging between the two networks. Each token created through Metalayer will have its own dedicated bridge page, simplifying cross-chain asset transfers and reducing operational complexity and cost. The core goal of Metalayer is to productize and modularize on-chain economic infrastructure, allowing projects to launch their token systems and economic models more efficiently and at a lower cost. Future updates will expand support to additional blockchain networks, broadening the scope of cross-chain asset issuance and circulation. Caldera continues to enhance the Metalayer ecosystem, making token creation, cross-chain transfers, and on-chain economy setup simpler and more flexible.

Caldera has officially launched the Metalayer Token Launcher, the first no-code solution supporting cross-chain token deployment. It provides project teams with a suite of code-free token issuance tools, enabling rapid creation and deployment of MetaTokens, further lowering the technical barriers to launching on-chain economic systems and asset issuance.

The Metalayer Token Launcher significantly simplifies the token issuance process. Users only need to set the token name, total supply, and add a Treasury wallet address to complete token creation and deployment within minutes, without writing smart contracts or performing complex technical configurations, allowing projects to launch their on-chain economic systems more quickly.

In the initial phase, the Metalayer Token Launcher will support the Arbitrum and Ethereum ecosystems, with near real-time cross-chain bridging between the two chains. Each token created through Metalayer will come with an independent cross-chain bridge page, making asset transfers between different chains more convenient and efficient, while reducing the cost and complexity of cross-chain operations.

The core goal of Metalayer is to productize and modularize on-chain economic infrastructure, enabling project teams to launch their token systems and economic models at lower costs and with higher efficiency. In the future, the Metalayer Token Launcher will gradually support more blockchain networks, further expanding cross-chain asset issuance and circulation scenarios.

With the launch of the Metalayer Token Launcher, Caldera continues to enhance its Metalayer ecosystem infrastructure, making token creation, cross-chain circulation, and on-chain economic system setup simpler, more flexible, and more efficient.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main product announced by Caldera in the article?

ACaldera announced the Metalayer Token Launcher, a no-code solution for cross-chain token deployment.

QWhich two blockchain ecosystems are initially supported by the Metalayer Token Launcher?

AThe Metalayer Token Launcher initially supports the Arbitrum and Ethereum ecosystems.

QWhat are the key steps required for a user to create a token using the Metalayer Token Launcher?

AUsers only need to set the token name, total supply, and add a Treasury wallet address to create a token.

QWhat additional feature does every token created through Metalayer include to facilitate cross-chain movement?

AEvery token created through Metalayer includes an independent cross-chain bridge page for easier and more efficient asset movement between chains.

QWhat is the core goal of the Metalayer project as stated in the article?

AThe core goal of Metalayer is to productize and modularize on-chain economic infrastructure, allowing projects to launch their token systems and economic models at a lower cost and with higher efficiency.

Related Reads

Patrick Witt Delays Military Training to Lead White House Push for CLARITY Act

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has delayed his military training with the Georgia Army National Guard to lead White House negotiations on the CLARITY Act. With the Senate entering recess on August 8, this period is seen as crucial for advancing the bill, which aims to establish clear regulatory rules for the digital asset market in the United States. This marks the second time Witt has postponed his military service for this purpose. His role as the administration's lead negotiator has gained increased importance following the impending departure of Deputy Director Harry Jung, ensuring leadership continuity during critical legislative efforts. The White House is prioritizing the passage of this significant cryptocurrency regulation before the Senate break.

TheNewsCrypto8m ago

Patrick Witt Delays Military Training to Lead White House Push for CLARITY Act

TheNewsCrypto8m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit12m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit12m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit12m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit12m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News23m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News23m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit39m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片