Bubblemaps trace Polymarket accounts linked to Iran strike bets

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps has uncovered a network of connected wallets that profited from highly accurate bets on U.S. and Israeli military strikes involving Iran on the prediction market Polymarket. The investigation identified multiple accounts, including one named “nothingeverhappens911,” which moved profits off-platform and was linked via a shared Binance deposit to another account called “Skoobidoobnj.” This second account reportedly earned around $100,000 from bets placed just before strikes on 13 June and 21 June 2025. Two additional connected accounts made approximately $65,000 and $10,000 from bets on a 28 February U.S. strike and a 13 June Israeli operation, respectively. In total, four accounts generated about $240,000 from these trades. These findings follow earlier reports of six wallets making $1.2 million from the 28 February strike, raising concerns about potential use of non-public information. The activity has intensified scrutiny over whether prediction markets incentivize trading on privileged geopolitical knowledge.

Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps says it has identified a network of connected wallets that profited from betting on military strikes involving Iran on the crypto prediction market Polymarket.

In a thread published on X, Bubblemaps said it traced funds between several Polymarket accounts that placed highly accurate bets on U.S. and Israeli strikes. This raises questions about whether traders may have had advance knowledge of geopolitical events.

The findings follow earlier reports that six wallets collectively earned about $1.2 million by betting that the United States would strike Iran on 28 February, with many of the positions reportedly opened only hours before the attack.

Wallet tracing links Polymarket accounts

According to Bubblemaps, a wallet identified as 0xa4eb, operating under the Polymarket username “nothingeverhappens911,” recently moved profits off the platform.

Tracing those funds led to another Polymarket account called “Skoobidoobnj,” with the connection established through a shared Binance deposit address.

The second account allegedly made about $100,000 betting “yes” shortly before two separate military developments involving Iran in 2025.

Those events included:

  • 13 June 2025: Israel launched an operation targeting Iranian assets.
  • 21 June 2025: The United States reportedly joined the conflict with strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow.

Bubblemaps said the on-chain links suggest the accounts may be part of a broader cluster of traders using connected wallets.

Additional accounts identified

The analytics firm said the Polymarket account “Skoobidoobnj” is also linked on-chain to two additional accounts suspected of placing trades at similarly timed intervals.

According to Bubblemaps:

  • One account allegedly earned about $65,000 betting on a U.S. strike on 28 February.
  • Another reportedly made around $10,000 on predictions related to the 13 June Israeli strike.

In total, the firm said four connected Polymarket accounts generated about $240,000 from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran.

Earlier $1.2M betting activity raised scrutiny

The latest findings build on the earlier discovery that six recently funded wallets made roughly $1.2 million from the 28 February U.S. strike market.

Many of those wallets were reportedly funded within 24 hours of the event. They placed bets specifically on a strike occurring on that date.

The timing of the trades drew scrutiny from analysts and policymakers, with critics suggesting the activity could indicate traders acting on privileged information.

Prediction markets face growing attention

Crypto-based prediction platforms such as Polymarket allow users to trade on the likelihood of real-world events ranging from elections to geopolitical conflicts.

While supporters argue that prediction markets can aggregate information efficiently, critics warn that they may create incentives for trading on sensitive or nonpublic information.

The Bubblemaps findings add to the ongoing debate over whether blockchain analytics could help identify suspicious trading behavior in decentralized prediction markets.


Final Summary

  • Bubblemaps says on-chain tracing linked several Polymarket accounts that profited from betting on U.S. and Israeli strikes involving Iran.
  • The findings follow earlier reports that six wallets earned about $1.2M from bets predicting a 28 February U.S. strike on Iran.

Related Questions

QWhat did blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps identify regarding Polymarket accounts and bets on military strikes involving Iran?

ABubblemaps identified a network of connected wallets that profited from betting on military strikes involving Iran on the crypto prediction market Polymarket, with some accounts placing highly accurate bets shortly before the events.

QHow much did the six wallets collectively earn from betting on the U.S. strike on Iran on 28 February, and what was notable about the timing of their bets?

AThe six wallets collectively earned about $1.2 million from betting on the U.S. strike on Iran on 28 February, with many positions opened only hours before the attack.

QWhich Polymarket username was associated with wallet 0xa4eb, and how was it linked to another account called 'Skoobidoobnj'?

AWallet 0xa4eb operated under the Polymarket username 'nothingeverhappens911' and was linked to another account called 'Skoobidoobnj' through a shared Binance deposit address.

QWhat were the two military events in June 2025 that the account 'Skoobidoobnj' reportedly bet on, and how much profit did it make?

AThe account 'Skoobidoobnj' bet on an Israeli operation targeting Iranian assets on 13 June 2025 and U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow on 21 June 2025, making about $100,000 in profit.

QWhat is the total amount that the four connected Polymarket accounts generated from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran?

AThe four connected Polymarket accounts generated about $240,000 from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran.

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit7m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit7m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit12m ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit12m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit18m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit18m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit18m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit18m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit33m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit33m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片