Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-06-04Last updated on 2026-06-04

Abstract

As Bitcoin and Ethereum prices drop significantly, two major corporate treasury holders, Strategy and Bitmine, are facing massive unrealized losses—approximately $100 billion and $90 billion, respectively. The article compares their financial health and underlying risks. Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH, relies primarily on equity financing (like ATM offerings) and has substantial cash reserves, alongside staking income from its ETH holdings. It plans a $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy, holding Bitcoin, is burdened by significant convertible debt and preferred stock dividends, with cash reserves covering only about six months of its annual dividend obligations. Strategy's leverage is higher, and it faces potential liquidity pressure if BTC prices fall further, possibly forcing asset sales. While both companies are under pressure, Bitmine’s financial structure appears more resilient, whereas Strategy’s high leverage makes it more vulnerable to continued market declines.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser2010)

Amid the ongoing market decline, Strategy and Bitmine, the "Twin Titans of DAT Treasuries," have both incurred massive floating losses.

This morning, BTC briefly fell below $62,000, currently hovering around $63,800; ETH dropped below $1,800, currently around $1,780. At current prices, Strategy's floating loss has reached a staggering $10 billion; Bitmine's floating loss is also around $9 billion. For now, Michael Saylor and Tom Lee are "fellow sufferers in the same predicament," with Strategy and Bitmine ranking as the top two "DAT companies with the largest losses."

However, compared to Strategy, which requires continuous dividend payments, Bitmine faces less financial pressure and retains flexibility such as raising funds through STRC preferred shares. It is reported that Bitmine plans to raise $300 million by issuing perpetual preferred shares with an annual dividend yield of 9.5%. It seems Bitmine's pace of acquiring ETH continues; meanwhile, the Sword of Damocles hanging over Strategy becomes: Where will the funds for subsequent STRC dividend payments come from? Between the two, who faces greater financial pressure? Odaily Planet Daily will analyze for readers.

Bitmine VS Strategy: The Divergent Paths of DAT Holdings

Following today's BTC plunge, community members used AI to mock Saylor's "promotion" of BTC: "A man in his sixties personally promotes, ancestral BTC price drops to $62,000 per coin."

Returning to Bitmine and Strategy, currently, Bitmine's financial structure appears safer; whereas Strategy's leverage pressure is greater.

Bitmine's Equity Issuance Game: The Debt-Free DAT Financing Play

As of June 1, Bitmine holds 5,416,901 ETH; accounting for approximately 4.49% of ETH's total supply, nearing the '5% cap' repeatedly emphasized by Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee. Yesterday, Bitmine once again acquired 25,000 ETH via BitGo, valued at $48 million at the time. Currently, its holdings stand at 5,441,901 ETH.

The reason Bitmine has the confidence to continue accumulating during a market downturn is multifaceted. The primary reason is that Bitmine's funding source is equity issuance:

  • When initiating its ETH treasury and establishing the DAT company in June last year, Bitmine obtained initial seed capital through financing — $250 million, along with a small PIPE financing.
  • After July last year, Bitmine primarily relied on ATM equity issuance, gradually increasing this figure from $2 billion to $24.5 billion.

Sufficient funds give Tom Lee ample confidence, and Bitmine's book cash supports further acquisitions — in its June 1 public announcement, Bitmine also mentioned: The company's stake in Beast Industries is valued at $180 million; its stake in Eightco Holdings is valued at $93 million. The company's total cash amounts to $446 million.

Additionally, Tom Lee has previously boasted that Bitmine's Ethereum treasury generates daily staking rewards of $1 million. This refers to Bitmine staking approximately 87% (about 4.71 million ETH) of its ETH holdings through its MAVAN staking network, with estimated annualized returns of about 2.73%-3% (approximately $250-$300 million), which can also provide relatively stable cash flow.

In summary, Bitmine's financial condition is sound; and the latest preferred share financing with a 9.5% annualized dividend is expected to secure $300 million, further alleviating its financial pressure. For this company, the biggest risk points lie in equity dilution (issuing new shares) and further stock price declines due to book floating losses. If mNVA remains <1, it might trigger stock selling.

Strategy's Debt Leverage Game: Pressure from Convertible Bonds and Preferred Share Dividends

Compared to Bitmine's "using investors' money to buy ETH," Strategy faces greater financial pressure in acquiring BTC because it primarily "borrows money to increase BTC holdings."

According to information on Strategy's official website, currently, Strategy holds approximately $6.7 billion in convertible bond debt, plus about $9.9 billion in STRC preferred shares and market-value-varying amounts of STRD, STRK, STRF, requiring annual massive dividend and interest payments. At the end of May, after repurchasing $1.5 billion in convertible debt, Strategy's cash reserves fell to about $871 million, covering only about 6 months of its estimated $1.7 billion annual preferred dividend obligation.

Moreover, Strategy previously initiated a vote on "proposing to increase STRC dividend payments from monthly to twice monthly." The voting began on April 28 and will conclude on the meeting day of June 8. If approved, the first record date under the new schedule is June 30, and the first payment date is July 15. Eligible voting shareholders (holders of MSTR and STRC shares) must have held shares before April 17.

Also worth mentioning is that STRC's authorized issuance cap is approximately $28.3 billion. Possibly affected by BTC's continuous decline and shaken market confidence, STRC fell below $95 this morning, currently at $94.65, "de-pegging" over 5% from the $100 target price.

Compared to Bitmine, Strategy currently faces a significant gap between excessive preferred share financing amounts and dividend payments, exacerbated by BTC's continuous decline. Furthermore, unlike ETH which has a staking ecosystem for additional liquidity, BTC lacks such options.

Therefore, after Strategy sold 32 BTC last month, the market began to doubt the identity of "diamond-handed Strategy that only buys and never sells." Amid BTC's persistent decline, Strategy might face a series of liquidity crises, leading to an inability to repay debts and dividends, thereby selling more BTC and driving down prices. Essentially, Strategy is playing a "high-leverage bet that the BTC price won't fall below a certain level" debt leverage game.

Thus, considering Strategy's current mNAV value of 0.83, the market remains highly skeptical of its future stock performance. Yesterday, its market capitalization already fell out of the top 200 US companies. Currently, Strategy (MSTR) stock is at $126, down 7% in 24 hours; market cap stands at $44.6 billion.

Of course, as a leader among DAT treasury companies, Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee remains quite optimistic about Strategy, previously stating: "Strategy selling Bitcoin and ETF outflows are typical bottoming behavior, not risk signals." At the recent "Proof of Talk 2026" conference at the Louvre in Paris, Tom Lee made bold claims: "With AI and tokenization driving major changes in financial infrastructure, ETH could ultimately reach $250,000." However, when discussing "Bitmine's actions after its ETH holdings reach 5% of the total supply," he also expressed caution about further ETH accumulation. (See "Tom Lee Recharges Faith: Crypto Spring Has Arrived, ETH Will Rise to $250,000")

Currently, Bitmine and Strategy find themselves in highly similar market situations, but Bitmine's financial condition is slightly better; Strategy faces the choice between "selling more BTC to obtain cash flow for dividend payments" and "sitting idle or continuing to borrow for acquisition as BTC keeps falling."

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the main difference in how Bitmine and Strategy finance their digital asset acquisitions?

ABitmine primarily funds its ETH acquisitions through equity issuance (ATM offerings and stock sales), which is a debt-free method. In contrast, Strategy primarily uses debt leverage, including convertible notes and preferred stock, to finance its BTC purchases, creating significant interest and dividend obligations.

QWhat specific financial pressure does Strategy face that the article highlights as its 'sword of Damocles'?

AStrategy faces significant pressure to cover its substantial annual dividend payments for its preferred stock (like STRC), estimated at $1.7 billion. With its cash reserves dwindling, the core question is where the funds for these ongoing dividend payments will come from.

QHow does Bitmine generate an additional income stream from its ETH holdings, as mentioned in the article?

ABitmine stakes approximately 87% of its ETH holdings (around 4.71 million ETH) through the MAVAN staking network. This generates daily staking rewards estimated at $1 million, providing a stable annualized cash flow of approximately $250-300 million.

QWhat are the key risk factors mentioned for Bitmine and Strategy's stock prices respectively?

AFor Bitmine, the main risk is equity dilution from issuing new shares and a declining stock price if its mNVA (market value to net asset value) falls below 1. For Strategy, the key risk is its high leverage and liquidity crisis if BTC prices fall further, potentially forcing asset sales and causing its mNAV to drop (currently 0.83), which could severely impact its stock price.

QWhat recent action by Strategy has caused market doubts about its 'diamond hands' reputation, and what potential consequence does the article suggest?

AStrategy recently sold 32 BTC. This action has led the market to doubt its long-held 'diamond hands' (never selling) policy. The article suggests that if BTC continues to fall, Strategy might face a liquidity crisis, forcing it to sell more BTC to meet its debt and dividend obligations, which could further depress the market.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报55m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报55m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片