Blockchain trial on Canton Network tests collateral reuse with tokenized US Treasurys

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-09Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

Digital Asset and a group of major financial institutions have successfully conducted a second round of onchain US Treasury financing trials on the Canton Network. The test introduced real-time collateral reuse using tokenized US Treasurys and expanded the use of multiple stablecoins, including USDC, to enhance onchain liquidity. This innovation bypasses traditional operational delays associated with rehypothecation. Participants included Bank of America, Citadel Securities, Cumberland DRW, Virtu Financial, Société Générale, Tradeweb, Circle, Brale, and M1X Global. The Canton Network, a blockchain built for institutional finance, continues to grow in the tokenized real-world assets (RWA) space, with over $370 billion represented onchain, leading the market significantly.

Digital Asset and a group of financial institutions have completed a second round of onchain US Treasury financing on the Canton Network, introducing real-time collateral reuse and expanding the number of stablecoins involved.

Five transactions were executed in the newest phase, building on the July pilot, which first demonstrated that US Treasurys and the USDC (USDC) stablecoin could be combined to finance and settle transactions on the blockchain.

In the latest trial, the companies used multiple stablecoins to finance positions against tokenized US Treasurys, widening the pool of onchain liquidity available for financing transactions.

The trial showed that tokenized US Treasurys could be passed between counterparties and reused as collateral in real-time, sidestepping the operational delays that typically accompany rehypothecation in traditional finance.

The effort brought together Bank of America, Citadel Securities, Cumberland DRW, Virtu Financial, Société Générale, Tradeweb, Circle, Brale and M1X Global, which are all a part of the Canton Network’s Industry Working Group.

Kelly Mathieson, chief business development officer at Digital Asset — the company behind the Canton Network — said in a statement that the test was “part of a thoughtful progression toward a new market model.”

Justin Peterson, chief technology officer of Tradeweb, added that “demonstrating real-time collateral reuse and expanded stablecoin liquidity isn’t just a technical achievement — it’s a blueprint for what the future of institutional finance can look like.”

Related: ‘We refused to do an ICO’: The truth behind Canton’s tokenomics

Canton Network expands footprint in tokenized RWAs

The Canton Network, a layer-1 blockchain built for institutional finance, has been expanding its presence across the tokenization sector this year.

On Dec. 4, its developer Digital Asset secured roughly $50 million in strategic backing from BNY, iCapital, Nasdaq and S&P Global. The new funding followed a $135 million raise earlier this year and is intended to support the network’s scaling efforts.

In October, asset manager Franklin Templeton said it would migrate its Benji Investments platform — which tokenizes shares of the firm’s flagship US money market fund — to the Canton Network.

Data from RWA.xyz also shows the Canton Network now leads the market for tokenized real-world assets by a wide margin, with more than $370 billion represented onchain, far outpacing popular networks such as Ethereum, Polygon, Solana and other public chains.

Top blockchains for RWA. Source: RWA.xyz

Magazine: 6 reasons Jack Dorsey is definitely Satoshi... and 5 reasons he’s not

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit13m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit13m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit26m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片