BlackRock Lists iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF on Nasdaq

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

BlackRock has registered its iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF (ticker: ETHB) on Nasdaq, marking its first crypto product to include Ethereum staking and the third such product available to U.S. investors. The ETF holds spot Ethereum and stakes 70% to 95% of its assets, distributing 82% of staking rewards to investors monthly. The remaining 18% is allocated to the trust, custodians, and staking providers. A sponsor fee of 0.25% is temporarily reduced to 0.12% for the first $2.5 billion in assets during the first year to encourage early adoption. Coinbase serves as the primary custodian and staking provider, receiving 10% of staking rewards, which decreases to 6% if assets reach $20 billion. Other entities involved are custodian Anchorage Digital and validators Figment Inc., Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure LLC, and Attestant Limited. ETHB joins BlackRock’s existing crypto products, including the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA). Competitor Grayscale offers similar staking products with varying reward distributions and fee structures.

On March 12, BlackRock registered its iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF on Nasdaq under the ticker ETHB. This is the first crypto product of BlackRock to include Ethereum staking, and it is the third staked Ethereum product accessible to U.S. investors.

ETHB has spot Ethereum and stakes around 70% to 95% of its holdings on the Ethereum network. Investors get 82% of staking rewards via monthly distributions. The other 18% is further split among the trust, custodians, and staking service providers.

Also, there is a fixed 0.25% sponsor fee, which is temporarily cut down to 0.12% by BlackRock on the first $2.5 billion in assets for the first year. The discount is aimed at aiding the product in making traction early on.

ETHB is now part of BlackRock’s existing crypto lineup, which adds the iShares Bitcoin Trust ($IBIT) and the iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA). In the current scenario, IBIT manages over $55 billion in assets. ETHA holds around $6.5 billion.

The Custodian and Staking Provider

The primary custodian and staking provider of the fund remains Coinbase. According to an SEC amendment filed March 9, Coinbase will get 10% of staking rewards as a base fee. That fee slips to 6% if the fund goes to $20 billion in assets under management.

The other custodian remains Anchorage Digital. Approved validators for the fund are Figment Inc., Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure LLC, and Attestant Limited. BlackRock needs validators to keep the fund’s Ethereum in a different keypair.

However, amalgamating with assets from any other entity is restricted. The closest rival of ETHB in the Staking ETF space is Greyscale. Its Ethereum Mini Trust offers 94% of rewards to investors and charges a 0.15% management fee.

Its ETHE product crosses 77% of rewards but has a higher 2.5% management fee. Both BlackRock and Greyscale were introduced by the REX-Osprey ETH+ Staking ETF, which rolled out in September 2025.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Solayer Launches Real-Time Stablecoin Payments on Live InfiniSVM Mainnet

TagsblackRockETFETHEREUM

Related Questions

QWhat is the ticker symbol for BlackRock's iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF listed on Nasdaq?

AThe ticker symbol for BlackRock's iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF is ETHB.

QWhat percentage of staking rewards do investors receive from the ETHB ETF, and how are they distributed?

AInvestors receive 82% of staking rewards via monthly distributions from the ETHB ETF.

QWho is the primary custodian and staking provider for BlackRock's ETHB fund?

AThe primary custodian and staking provider for the ETHB fund is Coinbase.

QWhat is the sponsor fee for the ETHB ETF, and what temporary discount is being offered?

AThere is a fixed 0.25% sponsor fee, which is temporarily reduced to 0.12% on the first $2.5 billion in assets for the first year.

QHow does the Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust compare to ETHB in terms of rewards and management fees?

AGrayscale's Ethereum Mini Trust offers 94% of rewards to investors and charges a 0.15% management fee, while its ETHE product offers 77% of rewards with a 2.5% management fee.

Related Reads

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit7h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit7h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手7h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手7h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit8h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片