BlackRock, Apollo, Citadel Enter the Market in the Same Week, Investing Real Money in DeFi Governance Tokens

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-25Last updated on 2026-03-25

Abstract

In February 2026, major financial institutions including BlackRock, Apollo, and Citadel made significant moves into DeFi by directly purchasing governance tokens and integrating their products with decentralized infrastructure. Citadel invested in LayerZero’s ZRO token, BlackRock listed its $2.5B BUIDL fund on UniswapX and acquired UNI tokens, and Apollo committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho’s token supply over four years. These actions mark a shift from exploratory partnerships to tangible on-chain engagement, emphasizing economic alignment through token ownership and the use of live, revenue-generating DeFi protocols. The trend reflects growing institutional confidence in public, permissionless DeFi infrastructure, driven by proven scalability and network effects. Regulatory developments, such as the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, could further accelerate this institutional adoption of DeFi.

Author: José Sanchez & Kelvin Koh

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: In February 2026, the way traditional financial institutions entered DeFi underwent a qualitative change: no longer through strategic partnership announcements, but by directly purchasing governance tokens and routing products to decentralized infrastructure.

Within five days, Citadel bought ZRO, BlackRock bought UNI and listed BUIDL on UniswapX, Apollo committed to acquiring 9% of Morpho's token supply over four years. Spartan Group believes this is the true inflection point for the institutionalization of DeFi.

Full Text Below:

Inflection Point for DeFi Institutionalization

February 2026, within just five days, a cluster of landmark institution-crypto collaborations emerged, which we believe marks a qualitative change in how traditional finance participates in on-chain infrastructure.

Citadel Securities announced an investment in LayerZero's ZRO token; BlackRock listed its $2.5 billion BUIDL fund on UniswapX and purchased UNI tokens; Apollo Global Management committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho's total governance token supply over four years.

Previously, the NYSE had already announced on January 19th the launch of a tokenized securities platform supporting 24/7 on-chain settlement. The pattern is clear: institutional capital is shifting from exploration to real on-chain execution—buying tokens, acquiring governance rights, routing products to decentralized infrastructure.

This wave of entry differs from previous cycles in three ways.

First, these are direct token purchases that create economic alignment, not advisory arrangements or pilot declarations.

Second, the related products are actively operating with real revenue: BUIDL manages $2.5 billion, Morpho supports over $900 million in active loans for Coinbase, LayerZero has settled over $70 billion in USDT0 cross-chain transfers.

Third, institutions chose public, permissionless protocols, not proprietary closed systems, indicating that the composability and network effects of existing DeFi infrastructure are more valuable than the control offered by custom systems.

The NYSE kicked off this show on January 19th, announcing plans to build a blockchain-based venue supporting 24/7 trading and instant on-chain settlement of tokenized stocks and ETFs, combining its Pillar matching engine with a blockchain post-trade system. Although still subject to regulatory approval and implementation details are relatively limited, this is the highest-level directional signal: the world's most iconic stock exchange is targeting on-chain settlement as core infrastructure.

LayerZero followed on February 10th with Zero, a new L1 designed for institutional-grade financial infrastructure. Citadel Securities made a strategic ZRO token purchase, significant for a firm handling about 35% of US retail stock trading.

DTCC will explore using Zero to expand its tokenization and collateral management capabilities; ICE is evaluating the chain for 24/7 trading infrastructure; Google Cloud joined to explore AI Agent micropayments; ARK Invest holds both equity and token positions, with Cathie Wood joining the advisory board.

Tether also announced a separate strategic investment in LayerZero Labs on the same day. Zero is expected to launch in Fall 2026, with three zones: a general EVM environment, a privacy-focused payments zone, and a dedicated trading zone.

Institutional interest reflects proven throughput capability. USDT0—Tether's omnichain stablecoin built on LayerZero's OFT standard—has facilitated over $70 billion in cross-chain transfers since January 2025.

As shown in the figure below, daily settled value accelerated sharply after USDT0's launch, transforming LayerZero from a messaging layer into critical financial infrastructure.

Figure: USDT0 has facilitated over $70 billion in cross-chain transfers since launch

Source: BridgeWTF

The next day, BlackRock's $2.4 billion BUIDL fund (the largest tokenized US Treasury product) was listed and made tradable on UniswapX, marking the first time a BlackRock product became accessible via decentralized exchange infrastructure.

Securitize handles compliance and whitelisting, while Wintermute, Flowdesk, and Tokka Labs compete for quotes through UniswapX's RFQ framework. BlackRock also disclosed a strategic UNI token purchase (specific terms not yet public), its first DeFi governance token on its balance sheet.

Although BUIDL's access is still limited to qualified purchasers with a minimum of $5 million, Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo stated that the infrastructure is designed to scale to retail products over time.

The decision to list on Uniswap reflects BUIDL's evolution from a niche experiment to an institutional-scale product. Since launching in March 2024 with a $40 million size, the fund peaked at nearly $2.9 billion in mid-2025 and currently has a TVL of around $2.5 billion.

Figure: BlackRock's BUIDL fund currently has a TVL of $2.5 billion

Source: Defillama

On February 13th, Apollo Global Management signed a cooperation agreement, committing to acquire up to 90 million MORPHO tokens over 48 months, approximately 9% of the total supply.

In addition to the token acquisition (valued at approximately $110 million at mid-February prices), Apollo will also collaborate to build on-chain lending markets, extending its blockchain footprint—part of its credit strategies are already tokenized via Securitize (ACRED) and Anemoy (ACRDX).

This deal is one of the most significant collaborations to date between an institution and a native DeFi protocol.

The opportunities for institutions within Morpho extend beyond token ownership. The protocol's architecture allows any entity to become a vault curator, building lending markets with customized risk parameters. Curators can earn performance fees from generated yield and management fees (capped at 5%) from AUM, creating a sustainable revenue model for institutional participants.

Perhaps the most convincing validation of the infrastructure is the CeFi-DeFi "Mohawk" model pioneered by Coinbase: retail users borrow against BTC and ETH collateral through the Coinbase interface, while Morpho acts as the lending engine on the backend, currently supporting over $900 million in active loans and $1.7 billion in collateral.

This proves that institutional-grade DeFi can be abstracted and scaled to operate behind familiar consumer interfaces, with users not needing to interact with the underlying protocol.

For Apollo, the vault curator economics, the validated distribution channel via Coinbase, and the governance influence gained through token accumulation together form a strong positioning in the on-chain credit space.

This convergence validates the design choices of permissionless, composable protocols and suggests sustained demand for governance tokens of infrastructure layer projects.

Key risks remain in execution: regulatory approval for the NYSE platform and Zero is pending, institutional token purchases may test protocol governance, and the gap between announcements and sustained on-chain activity remains significant. Nonetheless, the directional signal is unmistakable.

Figure: Morpho vault curators have generated substantial fee revenue

Source: Blockworks Research

Looking ahead, we expect these partnerships to deepen further once the CLARITY Act is passed. The Act passed the House in July 2025 by a vote of 294 to 134 and is now advancing in the Senate, where the Banking and Agriculture Committees need to reconcile their respective draft versions before a full vote.

The main point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yield: the banking side is pushing to restrict interest payments on stablecoin balances, while crypto firms argue this would push innovation overseas.

July is widely seen as a key deadline before the August recess; if missed, the next window will be delayed until the fall. Once enacted, the CLARITY Act will provide the US's first comprehensive digital asset regulatory framework, clarify SEC/CFTC jurisdiction, establish a registration path for digital commodity exchanges, and provide legal certainty for tokenized products.

For protocols like Morpho and Uniswap, this will remove the regulatory ambiguity that currently constrains the scope of institutional cooperation. We believe this will unlock a second, broader wave of TradFi-crypto integration.

Related Questions

QWhat significant shift in how traditional financial institutions engage with DeFi occurred in February 2026?

AThe shift was a move from strategic partnership announcements to directly purchasing governance tokens and routing products to decentralized infrastructure, marking a qualitative change in their participation.

QWhich three major institutions made significant moves into DeFi within a five-day period, and what did each do?

ACitadel Securities invested in LayerZero's ZRO token; BlackRock listed its $2.5B BUIDL fund on UniswapX and purchased UNI tokens; Apollo Global Management committed to acquiring up to 9% of Morpho's token supply over four years.

QWhat are the three key differences between this wave of institutional entry into DeFi and previous cycles?

A1. They involve direct token purchases creating economic alignment, not just advisory roles or pilot announcements. 2. The involved products are actively operating with real revenue. 3. Institutions chose public, permissionless protocols over proprietary closed systems, valuing composability and network effects.

QWhat is the significance of the 'Mohawk' model pioneered by Coinbase, as mentioned in the context of Morpho?

AThe 'Mohawk' model is a CeFi-DeFi hybrid where retail users borrow against BTC and ETH through the Coinbase interface, while Morpho acts as the lending engine on the backend. It proves that institutional-grade DeFi can be abstracted and scaled behind a consumer interface.

QWhat potential future development does the article suggest could further deepen these TradFi-DeFi partnerships, and what is a key point of contention surrounding it?

AThe passage of the CLARITY Act is expected to deepen partnerships. A key point of contention is the treatment of stablecoin yield, with banks pushing to restrict interest payments on stablecoin balances, while crypto firms argue this would push innovation overseas.

Related Reads

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit57m ago

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit57m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit59m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit59m ago

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

CoreWeave's Q1 2026 earnings report has intensified the ongoing bull-bear battle over the AI infrastructure stock. While revenue doubled year-over-year to $2.08B and the firm's remaining performance obligation (RPO) surged to nearly $100B, its net loss more than doubled to $740M. The critical point of contention is profitability: while adjusted EBITDA margin was a robust 56%, the adjusted operating margin collapsed to just 1% due to soaring infrastructure and sales costs. A weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue guidance further triggered an 11.4% single-day stock drop. The bull thesis hinges on CoreWeave's massive order backlog, deep strategic ties with NVIDIA (as a customer, investor, and key supplier), and a diversified client base now including Anthropic and Meta. The bear case focuses on the "scale at all costs" model, where expanding revenue leads to wider losses, ballooning debt ($25B), and massive capital expenditures ($6.8B in Q1). Insider selling by executives contrasts with a notable new investor: Chinese investor Duan Yongping initiated a small position (0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 near the stock's lows. The coming Q2 report is seen as a key test for management's promise of a profit margin recovery.

marsbit1h ago

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

marsbit1h ago

China's Version of 'Tech Burning Man' Debuts in Shanghai, muShanghai Creates a Global Geek 'Pop-up City'

From May 10 to June 6, 2026, the inaugural muShanghai "Pop-up City" experiment, dubbed China's version of a "tech Burning Man," launched in Shanghai. Co-organized by the international open-source community The Mu and the Hongqiao Alibaba Center, this 28-day event aimed to build a global "parallel city" for geeks, attracting over 800 participants from more than 50 countries, including former OpenAI engineers and startup founders. The program featured four themed weeks: AI Week, Biotech Week, Robotics Week, and Culture Week, hosting nearly 100 sessions like ClawCon 2026. Activities ranged from discussions on AI safety and consumer apps to robot battles and cyberpunk culture, culminating in large outdoor "Innovator Marketplaces." A core principle was "Build in Public," encouraging open sharing of projects and progress. Hongqiao Alibaba Center served as the co-host and primary venue, positioning itself as a first-stop hub for international talent in China. The event marks a significant step for The Mu community, which has previously organized similar pop-up cities in Argentina and San Francisco, in bringing its model of immersive, collaborative innovation to China. It aims to be a key window for global科创 (scientific and technological innovation) exchange.

marsbit1h ago

China's Version of 'Tech Burning Man' Debuts in Shanghai, muShanghai Creates a Global Geek 'Pop-up City'

marsbit1h ago

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinist14h ago

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinist14h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片