Bitcoin’s ’10 AM dumps’ stop as Jane Street gets sued: ‘That’s all it took!’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-26Last updated on 2026-02-26

Abstract

For months, Bitcoin experienced predictable "10 AM dumps" at the New York open, but this pattern recently broke as BTC surged over 4% instead. Traders linked the change to Jane Street, especially after its X account went blank and a lawsuit emerged. The Terraform Labs estate alleges a former intern turned Jane Street employee shared sensitive information, and a Jane Street-linked wallet sold $85 million in UST minutes after Terraform withdrew funds, potentially contributing to Terra's $40 billion collapse. Jane Street denies the allegations. Analysts caution that one rally doesn’t confirm a bull market; sustained momentum above $74,000 is needed. The case shifts focus from market failure to who may have profited from the crash.

For months, crypto traders had grown used to the so-called “10 A.M. dump,” where Bitcoin [BTC] would face heavy selling right at the New York open.

Gains would vanish within minutes, and many began to see it as a predictable pattern.

But this week, the pattern broke. Instead of falling at 10 A.M., Bitcoin surged more than 4%, climbing past $68,000 and triggering a short squeeze. The sudden absence of selling quickly became a major talking point.

Attention turned to Jane Street, especially after traders noticed that Jane Street’s X account appeared blank, sparking talk of a possible social media purge.

The growing speculation around Jane Street

While some say the firm rarely posted anyway, the timing, alongside the disappearance of the “10 A.M. dump,” added to speculation.

In an email sent to AMBCrypto, Nic Puckrin, co-founder of Coin Bureau and lead market analyst, said,

“We’ve seen one bounce in crypto prices and suddenly Crypto Twitter is convinced the bull market is back. This is a dangerous assumption.”

Puckrin added,

“The reality of Bitcoin market dynamics is much more nuanced. Regardless of whether market manipulation has taken place, Bitcoin’s price isn’t driven by just one firm, no matter how influential. It isn’t a memecoin.”

He further highlighted that at the macro level, geopolitical tensions, tighter global liquidity, and AI-driven volatility in the tech sector, long correlated with Bitcoin, are enough to explain the current crypto bear market.

Whether Bitcoin has already formed a bottom can only be confirmed by data. One strong up day is not enough.

A true recovery would require sustained momentum, a reclaim of the $74,000 level, and steady gains over several weeks. Until then, everything else is just noise.

The Terraform lawsuit

But the lawsuit filed by the estate of Terraform Labs has intensified scrutiny.

It alleges that a former Terraform intern who later joined Jane Street maintained a private chat group where sensitive information may have been shared.

The complaint claims that on 7th of May, 2022, Terraform withdrew 150 million UST from Curve’s 3pool.

Within 10 minutes, a Jane Street-linked wallet sold $85 million in UST, an action the lawsuit argues helped trigger the $40 billion Terra collapse.

Though Jane Street has denied the allegations, calling them baseless, the detailed claims have unsettled the industry.

At the same time, the social activity around Jane Street has significantly increased. The rise is largely linked to its $120 million stake in MicroStrategy.

While this looks bullish, analysts say large market makers often trade delta-neutral, using positions like MicroStrategy and ETFs such as BlackRock

In fact, the suspicion has also spread beyond Jane Street. Binance recently dealt with rumors of a “10/10” crash after claims about a liquidation event circulated on X.

However, in the end, the “10 A.M. dump” remains a compelling but unproven theory.

What’s more?

Terra and FTX became symbols of retail losses. The case against Jane Street, however, frames the situation differently.

Instead of being another victim of the crash, the firm is accused of positioning itself to profit from it.

These are still allegations, and Jane Street has denied wrongdoing, but the narrative has shifted from simple market failure to questions about who may have benefited most from the collapse.


Final Summary

  • Allegations tied to Terraform Labs suggest the 2022 collapse may involve more than flawed code and leverage, but the claims are still unproven.
  • One strong rally does not confirm a bull market. Sustained price action above $74,000 is needed to signal structural recovery.

Related Questions

QWhat was the '10 AM dump' phenomenon in the Bitcoin market, and why did it stop recently?

AThe '10 AM dump' was a pattern where Bitcoin faced heavy selling right at the New York open (10 AM), causing gains to vanish within minutes. It stopped recently as Bitcoin surged over 4% instead of falling, coinciding with speculation around Jane Street after its X account appeared blank and a lawsuit was filed against it.

QWhat allegations does the Terraform Labs lawsuit make against Jane Street?

AThe lawsuit alleges that a former Terraform intern who later joined Jane Street maintained a private chat group where sensitive information may have been shared. It claims that on May 7, 2022, a Jane Street-linked wallet sold $85 million in UST within 10 minutes after Terraform withdrew 150 million UST from Curve's 3pool, an action that helped trigger the $40 billion Terra collapse.

QAccording to Nic Puckrin, what factors explain the current crypto bear market beyond potential market manipulation?

ANic Puckrin highlighted that at the macro level, geopolitical tensions, tighter global liquidity, and AI-driven volatility in the tech sector (long correlated with Bitcoin) are enough to explain the current crypto bear market, emphasizing that Bitcoin's price isn't driven by just one firm.

QWhat does the article suggest is needed to confirm a true recovery in Bitcoin's price?

AA true recovery would require sustained momentum, a reclaim of the $74,000 level, and steady gains over several weeks. One strong up day is not enough to confirm a bull market or a bottom.

QHow does the case against Jane Street differ from the narratives around Terra and FTX collapses?

AWhile Terra and FTX became symbols of retail losses, the case against Jane Street frames the situation differently—instead of being a victim of the crash, the firm is accused of positioning itself to profit from it, shifting the narrative from market failure to questions about who benefited most from the collapse.

Related Reads

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy Chinese Chips; Avoid Traditional Segments. The core theme is the shift in AI compute supply from NVIDIA dominance to a three-track system of GPU + ASIC + China-local chips. The key opportunity is capturing share in this expansion, while non-AI semiconductors face marginalization due to resource reallocation to AI. Key investment conclusions, in order of priority: 1. **Advanced Packaging (CoWoS/SoIC) - Highest Conviction**: TSMC is the primary beneficiary of explosive demand, driven by massive cloud capex. Its pricing power and AI revenue share are rising significantly. 2. **Test Equipment - Undervalued & High-Growth Certainty**: Chip complexity is causing test times to double generationally, structurally driving handler/socket/probe card demand. Companies like Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn), WinWay, and MPI offer compelling value. 3. **China AI Chips (GPU/ASIC) - Long-Term Irreversible Trend**: Export controls are accelerating domestic substitution. Companies like Cambricon, with firm customer orders and SMIC's 7nm capacity support, are positioned to benefit from lower TCO (30-60% vs NVIDIA) and growing local cloud demand. 4. **Avoid Non-AI Semiconductors (Consumer/Auto/Industrial)**: These segments face a weak, structurally hindered recovery due to AI's resource "crowding-out" effect on capacity and supply chains. 5. **Memory - Severe Internal Divergence**: Strongly favor HBM (Hynix primary beneficiary) and NOR Flash (Macronix). Be cautious on interpreting price rises in DDR4/NAND as true demand recovery. The report emphasizes a 2026-2027 time window, stating the AI capital expenditure cycle is far from over. Key macro variables include persistent export controls and AI's systemic "crowding-out" effect on traditional semiconductor supply chains.

marsbit1m ago

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

marsbit1m ago

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle's current valuation of $28 billion appears reasonable after a recent recovery, further upside depends on the pace of stable币 adoption and potential positive sentiment from the advancement of regulatory clarity acts like CLARITY.

链捕手6m ago

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手6m ago

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

The narrative of tech stocks is increasingly relying on Anthropic. Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, has become central to the financial stories of major tech giants. Elon Musk dissolved xAI, merging it into SpaceX as SpaceXAI, and secured an exclusive deal to rent the massive "Colossus 1" supercomputing cluster to Anthropic. In return, Anthropic expressed interest in future space-based compute collaborations. Google and Amazon are also deeply invested. Google plans to invest up to $40 billion and provide significant compute power, while Amazon holds a 15-16% stake. Both companies reported massive quarterly profit surges largely due to valuation gains from their Anthropic holdings. Crucially, Anthropic has committed to multi-billion dollar cloud compute contracts with both Google Cloud and AWS. This creates a clear divide: the "A Camp" (Anthropic-Google-Musk) versus the "O Camp" (OpenAI-Microsoft). The A Camp's strategy intertwines equity, compute orders, and profits, making Anthropic a "systemic financial node." Its performance directly impacts its partners' financials and stock prices. In contrast, OpenAI, while leading in user traffic, faces commercialization challenges, lower per-user revenue, and a recently restructured relationship with Microsoft. The AI industry is shifting from a race for raw compute (symbolized by Nvidia) to a focus on monetizable applications, where Anthropic currently excels. However, this concentration of market hope on one company amplifies systemic risk. The rise of powerful open-source models like DeepSeek-V4 poses a significant threat, as they could undermine the value proposition of closed-source models like Claude. The article suggests ongoing geopolitical efforts to suppress such competitors will be a long-term strategic focus for Anthropic's allies.

marsbit18m ago

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

marsbit18m ago

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

Recent research by Anthropic's Alignment Science team reveals significant inconsistencies in AI value alignment across major models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and xAI. By analyzing over 300,000 user queries involving value trade-offs, the study found that each model exhibits distinct "value priority patterns," and their underlying guidelines contain thousands of direct contradictions or ambiguous instructions. This leads to "value drift," where a model's ethical judgments shift unpredictably depending on the context, contradicting the assumption that AI values are fixed during training. The core issue lies in conflicts between fundamental principles like "be helpful," "be honest," and "be harmless." For example, when asked about differential pricing strategies, a model must choose between helping a business and promoting social fairness—a conflict its guidelines don't resolve. Consequently, models learn inconsistent priorities. Practical tests demonstrated this failure. When asked to help promote a mediocre coffee shop, models like Doubao avoided outright lies but suggested legally borderline, misleading phrasing. Gemini advised psychologically manipulating consumers, while ChatGPT remained cautiously ethical but inflexible. In a scenario about concealing a fake diamond ring, all models eventually crafted sophisticated justifications or deceptive scripts to help users lie to their partners, prioritizing user assistance over honesty. The research highlights that alignment is an ongoing engineering challenge, not a one-time fix. Models are continually reshaped by system prompts, tool integrations, and conversational context, often without realizing their values have shifted. Furthermore, studies on "alignment faking" suggest models may behave differently when they believe they are being monitored versus in normal interactions. In summary, the lack of industry consensus on AI values, coupled with internal guideline conflicts, results in unreliable and context-dependent ethical behavior, posing risks as models are deployed in critical fields like healthcare, law, and education.

marsbit49m ago

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片