Bitcoin Price Surge in August. A Temporary Spike or the Start of a New Cycle

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-28Last updated on 2026-08-28

Abstract

"Bitcoin Price Surge in August: Temporary Spike or Start of a New Cycle?" The cryptocurrency market is ending August with a recovery attempt following a prolonged downtrend that began in October 2025. Bitcoin has seen confident growth recently, aided by macroeconomic and market factors. However, analysts agree it's too early to call a trend reversal, with bearish risks remaining and sideways price movement expected in the coming months within a wide range. Bitcoin's current dynamics fit the classic four-year cycles historically marked by alternating bull and bear trends. These cycles are linked to Bitcoin's halving events. Based on this pattern, the recent lows might indicate a local bottom and an attempt to break the October 2025 downtrend. Many key players statistically predict the cycle's bottom for autumn 2026. Analysts highlight persistent pressure from external macroeconomic factors, including high interest rates and the US Federal Reserve's firm stance, alongside geopolitical uncertainty. However, if recent positive inflation trends continue, the likelihood of Fed policy easing could increase, benefiting BTC and other risky assets. De-escalation in Iran-related tensions could also provide the Fed more room to soften its policy. Another pressure factor is competition from other asset classes, notably semiconductors and AI development. Mining companies are reportedly selling accumulated coin reserves and shifting towards providing computing power for AI, a more profi...

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice, the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that can lead to financial losses.

The cryptocurrency market is concluding August with an attempt at recovery following a prolonged downtrend that began back in October 2025. Over the past week, Bitcoin has shown confident growth, aided by a number of macroeconomic and market factors. However, analysts agree that it is too early to talk about a trend reversal — bearish risks remain, and sideways price movement within a broad range is expected in the coming months.

Bitcoin's current dynamics fit into the classic four-year cycles, which historically have formed alternating bull and bear trends. Although there is no unified methodology for calculating these cycles, they are all somehow based on Bitcoin halving (the programmed reduction in the rate of new coin issuance coded into its protocol).

Historically, the cycles between halvings have coincided with price cycles in the crypto market, and statistically, many key players predict the bottom of this cycle to occur in the autumn. Thus, from October 2026, when the previous peak of $126K was reached, 12 months will have passed, which roughly aligns with the statistics of past cycles.

"That is, following cycle theory, recent levels could indicate the formation of a local bottom and an attempt to break the downtrend that started in October 2025," noted Nikita Bredikhin, Lead Investment Analyst at Go Invest, pointing out that there are other factors shaping the price in current conditions.

Macroeconomics and Politics

At the same time, Bredikhin emphasizes that despite the crypto market's rise at the end of August, external macroeconomic factors continue to pressure the crypto market: high interest rates and the hawkish rhetoric of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) persist amid uncertainty regarding monetary policy.

Meanwhile, Oleg Kalmanovich, an analyst at Neomarkets, also draws attention to positive shifts in macroeconomics. He cited July inflation data as an example: "If this trend continues, the likelihood of the Fed softening its policy will increase, which could become an additional positive factor for BTC and other risky assets."

The geopolitical factor is also making its adjustments. In Kalmanovich's opinion, the continuation of the conflict around Iran is capable of maintaining high oil prices and inflationary pressure, whereas a reduction in tension, on the contrary, could give the Fed more room to ease policy.

Competition with AI and Semiconductors

Another potential pressure factor for the crypto market, according to Bredikhin, is competition with other asset classes — primarily the semiconductor industry and artificial intelligence developers. He noted that mining companies are massively selling off accumulated coin reserves and actively transitioning to servicing computing for AI, as it is a more profitable and predictable business with growing demand.

The same trend was observed among institutional investors, as Bredikhin reminded: traditional assets showed higher returns and noticeably higher volatility. The expert believes this is precisely why recent months have seen outflows from spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and a decline in trading interest in the crypto market.

At the same time, Kalmanovich points out that since the beginning of August, Bitcoin ETFs have attracted over $3.5 billion (as of the 28th), indicating a recovery in institutional demand.

Bitcoin Price Forecasts

From a technical standpoint, both experts do not expect explosive growth. Kalmanovich highlights a strong resistance level at $86K, from which a correction towards the accumulation zone of $74K is possible. And if this support holds, after the correction concludes, the path opens to $96K and further to $100K.

Meanwhile, Bredikhin gave a broader range for sideways movement: "I assume that Bitcoin will enter a broad sideways trend in the range of $60–85K and will continue to trade as such until the Fed's rhetoric softens or interest in the semiconductor manufacturing and AI technology sectors subsides."

Earlier, experts gave similar price forecasts within a broad price range of $62-100K, adding US crypto market regulation as a factor for growth in the autumn.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main factor behind the recent rise in Bitcoin's price according to the analysts in the article?

AThe recent rise in Bitcoin's price is attributed to a combination of macroeconomic factors and its alignment with historical four-year cycles based on halving events, with some analysts seeing it as a potential attempt to break the downtrend that began in October 2025.

QAccording to Nikita Bredikhin, what external macroeconomic factors are still putting pressure on the cryptocurrency market?

AAccording to Nikita Bredikhin, high interest rates and the persistently hawkish rhetoric from the US Federal Reserve (Fed), coupled with uncertainty regarding monetary policy, continue to exert pressure on the cryptocurrency market.

QWhat competitive pressure does Nikita Bredikhin identify as a challenge for the crypto market?

ANikita Bredikhin identifies competition from other asset classes, specifically the semiconductor industry and AI developers, as a challenge. He notes that mining companies are selling their coin reserves and shifting to providing computational power for AI due to its higher profitability and predictable demand.

QWhat key resistance and support levels for Bitcoin's price are mentioned by analyst Oleg Kalmanovich?

AAnalyst Oleg Kalmanovich identifies a strong resistance level at $86,000. He suggests a potential correction from there to an accumulation zone around $74,000. If this support holds, the path could then open towards $96,000 and then $100,000.

QWhat is Nikita Bredikhin's broader forecast for Bitcoin's price movement in the near term?

ANikita Bredikhin forecasts that Bitcoin will enter a wide sideways trading range between $60,000 and $85,000. He expects this pattern to continue until the Fed's rhetoric softens or interest in the semiconductor and AI technology sectors subsides.

Related Reads

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

In his first Jackson Hole speech, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled a significant shift in monetary policy communication. He declared that "forward guidance," a tool heavily used since the financial crisis, has outlived its usefulness in normal times and should be retired. He cautioned that over-reliance on it can distort market signals and constrain the Fed's flexibility. Instead, Warsh emphasized a return to data-dependence and decision-making discipline. Warsh outlined seven key principles to guide policy: anchoring the 2% inflation target, pursuing the employment mandate, using short-term rates as the primary tool, acknowledging the importance of money, and maintaining purposeful, restrained communication. He stressed that policy should focus on trends, not single data points. On the current economic outlook, Warsh noted that the labor market is consistent with full employment but inflation remains "far above" the Fed's target. He highlighted that over half of the PCE basket's components are still rising above 3% annually. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential for productivity and capital allocation, he admitted its full economic impact remains uncertain and is not a factor in current policy decisions. His core message was a commitment to policy discipline rather than pre-set decisions. Warsh stated the Fed's primary focus must be on restoring price stability, vowing, "We still have work to do," until there is clear evidence inflation is moving decisively toward 2%. He concluded by framing effective monetary policy as crucial for economic prosperity and U.S. global leadership.

Odaily星球日报9m ago

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

Odaily星球日报9m ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片