Bitcoin Price Bottom Could Be Around $40,000, On-Chain Data Shows

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-22Last updated on 2026-02-22

Abstract

Based on on-chain data analysis by Ali Martinez, the Bitcoin price bottom in the current bear market could be around $40,000. This projection hinges on the cost basis of long-term holders (LTH), investors who have held their coins for over 155 days. Historically, this level acts as a strong support during downturns, as these investors are less likely to sell and often increase their buying when the price approaches their average acquisition cost, which is currently approximately $40,363. If selling pressure does not overwhelm this renewed buying activity, this cost basis could mark the market bottom. Currently, Bitcoin is trading near $68,330, down over 45% from its all-time high.

The biggest question so far in the bear phase has been when and where the Bitcoin price will bounce back. According to the latest on-chain data, there might be a fresh answer as to where the price bottom will be in the current bear market.

Here’s Why $40,000 Could Be Pivotal To The Bear Market

In a recent post on the X platform, crypto analyst Ali Martinez identified the $40,000 level as a potential bottom for the Bitcoin price in the current market phase. This projection is based on the cost basis of an old investor cohort known as the long-term holders (LTH)

For context, the cost basis of long-term holders refers to the average price at which Bitcoin investors (who have held their coins for 155 days or more) acquired their coins. This price level is often relevant because long-term investors are often referred to as diamond hands, who are less likely to sell during periods of downside volatility.

Moreover, the LTH cost basis tends to act as the ultimate support level during bear markets, as most long-term investors are usually still in profit even in the thick of the bear market. Hence, when the Bitcoin price falls to this support, the long-term holders double down on their positions.

Source: @ali_charts on X

This renewed buying activity by the long-term holders would prop up the price of the premier cryptocurrency above their cost basis, as observed in the chart above. According to the highlighted data, the LTH cost basis is currently around $40,363, about 40% from the current price point.

If the Bitcoin price were to face further downside pressure and approach this cost basis, there is a likelihood it would receive support from the long-term investors’ increased reaccumulation. Hence, this cost basis could become the bottom for the current bear market.

On the flip side, the Bitcoin market could face an even deeper correction if the selling pressure overwhelms the long-term holders’ reaccumulation spree.

Bitcoin Price Overview

As of this writing, the price of BTC stands at around $68,330, reflecting a nearly 1% increase in the past 24 hours. However, this mild single-day action does little to correct the over 2% price decline witnessed by the premier cryptocurrency over the past week. According to data from CoinGecko, the Bitcoin price is currently down from its all-time high by more than 45%.

The price of BTC on the daily timeframe | Source: BTCUSDT chart on TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat is the on-chain data suggesting about the potential price bottom for Bitcoin in the current bear market?

AThe on-chain data suggests that the price bottom for Bitcoin could be around $40,000, based on the cost basis of long-term holders.

QWho are the 'long-term holders' (LTH) mentioned in the analysis, and why is their cost basis significant?

ALong-term holders are investors who have held their Bitcoin for 155 days or more. Their cost basis is significant because it often acts as a strong support level during bear markets, as these investors are less likely to sell and may even buy more when the price approaches their average purchase price.

QWhat is the specific cost basis for long-term holders that is cited as a potential support level?

AThe specific cost basis for long-term holders is currently around $40,363.

QWhat could happen if the selling pressure in the market overpowers the buying activity of long-term holders?

AIf the selling pressure overwhelms the long-term holders' reaccumulation, the Bitcoin market could experience an even deeper correction beyond the $40,000 support level.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin and its performance at the time of writing, according to the article?

AAt the time of writing, the price of Bitcoin was around $68,330, reflecting a nearly 1% increase in the past 24 hours, but it was still down over 2% for the week and more than 45% from its all-time high.

Related Reads

From Somersaults to Working 24/7: We Saw the ‘Working-Class’ Aura in Robots at WAIC

From performing acrobatics to working 24/7: Robots at WAIC are getting down to business. This year's World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai showcased a significant shift in the robotics industry. While "show-off" robots that dance, play music, or compete in sports are still present, the dominant trend is now practical, task-oriented machines. Hundreds of wheeled and humanoid robots were deployed as guides, baristas, factory workers, and even traffic controllers, moving beyond mere demonstrations to highlight real-world "work capabilities." The focus has pivoted from showcasing technical parameters to pursuing mass production and industrial落地 (landing/implementation). This transition presents major challenges. First, deploying powerful AI models onto robots requires overcoming hardware limitations in computing power and latency. Second, robots demand complex, integrated systems for real-time perception and control. Third, achieving reliable mass production necessitates unprecedented industry-wide collaboration on standards and supply chains. A key bottleneck identified by industry leaders is the robot's "brain"—its AI and cognitive capabilities. While hardware and basic movement ("little brain") have advanced rapidly, the higher-level intelligence for understanding complex instructions and adapting to unstructured environments is progressing more slowly. Companies are investing heavily in developing more advanced "brain" systems, but fully autonomous operation in dynamic settings remains a work in progress. Cost is another critical hurdle. While some consumer-oriented humanoid robots are now priced under $15,000, capable industrial models often cost $50,000 or more. The industry consensus is that bringing robots into unstructured home environments for tasks like comprehensive cleaning is still at least five years away due to technical, safety, and cost barriers. Therefore, 2026 is being called the "first year of mass production," but primarily for industrial and specific commercial applications. WAIC 2026 served less as a stage for spectacular tricks and more as a serious examination of robots' commercial viability, marking their transition from laboratory prototypes to real-world products that must prove their value through stable, repetitive work.

marsbit1h ago

From Somersaults to Working 24/7: We Saw the ‘Working-Class’ Aura in Robots at WAIC

marsbit1h ago

Live-Action Short Series Forced onto the Big Screen by AI

Live-action short dramas, originally a popular online format, are now attempting to enter the cinema. Several top IPs like "What a Good Girl" and "One Family, Same Class" have received approval for film adaptations. This shift is driven by several pressures within the short drama industry. After rapid growth fueled by low costs and platform support, the sector now faces a slowdown with fewer hits and reduced investment. A major disruptor is the explosive rise of AI-generated short dramas, which dominate new releases and challenge the traditional model with their speed and low cost. Platform policy changes, such as adjustments to revenue guarantees, have further squeezed producers. In this context, film adaptation is seen as a potential new growth path. It offers a chance to extend a short-lived online hit into a longer-lasting IP asset, moving beyond the "fast production, fast consumption" cycle. Established short dramas bring pre-validated stories and emotional appeal to the table, potentially lowering the risk for film investors. However, significant challenges remain. Translating a fast-paced, fragmented viewing experience designed for phones into a compelling cinematic narrative is difficult. Past attempts by popular TV shows and variety programs to make films have often failed due to weak content. A short drama's massive online viewership does not guarantee box office success, as cinema requires a higher commitment of time and money from audiences. Ultimately, the success of these adaptations will depend not on their original popularity, but on their ability to tell complete, emotionally resonant stories that meet the standards of the theatrical market.

marsbit2h ago

Live-Action Short Series Forced onto the Big Screen by AI

marsbit2h ago

Asymmetry of Algorithmic Agency: When AI Makes Decisions for You, You Don't Even Have the Right to Oppose

As AI increasingly makes decisions on our behalf, a critical asymmetry emerges: the entities deploying these systems understand and refine their algorithms, while individuals merely endure the consequences. This article explores the three layers of this "algorithmic agency asymmetry." First, opacity shields system goals, incentives, and flaws, creating a "black box fallacy" where outputs seem objective. Second, algorithms amplify historical biases, repackaging past inequalities in a seemingly neutral, computational form. Third, recursive systems lead to "algorithmic drift," where users train the system and are simultaneously trained by it, shaping their own choices and behaviors. This asymmetry has profound implications, extending into hiring, education, policing, and daily life. Users adapt to what the system rewards, but only see the end result—a score, recommendation, or price—without understanding the underlying logic or manipulated conditions. To rebalance this power dynamic, the article proposes policy interventions: 1) Meaningful transparency and explainability for users affected by AI decisions. 2) Enforceable impact assessments before deploying high-risk systems. 3) Genuine human oversight with the power to challenge outputs. 4) Mandatory post-deployment monitoring and auditing. 5) Outright bans on manipulative or exploitative systems. Finally, fostering widespread "algorithmic literacy" is essential public infrastructure. Ultimately, this asymmetry is a structural power imbalance. Good policy cannot eliminate it but can narrow the gap by making automated influence visible, contestable, auditable, and governable.

marsbit2h ago

Asymmetry of Algorithmic Agency: When AI Makes Decisions for You, You Don't Even Have the Right to Oppose

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片