Bitcoin Erases May Gains in 2 Days, Ending 6-Week ETF Inflow Streak: A Washout or Turning Signal?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-19Last updated on 2026-05-19

Abstract

Bitcoin plummeted below $77,000, erasing all gains made since the beginning of May within 48 hours. The sell-off was triggered by a combination of factors: soaring U.S. PPI data, which reduced rate cut expectations, and a shift in institutional flows. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw over $1 billion in net outflows for the week, ending a six-week inflow streak, contributing to a market-wide liquidation of $657 million, predominantly from long positions. Amidst the panic, notable institutional moves signaled a strategic consolidation. Michael Saylor's Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) doubled down, purchasing nearly 25,000 BTC for approximately $2 billion. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs's Q1 13F filing revealed a clear pivot towards Bitcoin, completely exiting its XRP and Solana ETF holdings, drastically reducing its Ethereum exposure by ~70%, and maintaining its ~$700 million Bitcoin ETF position. The actions highlight a growing institutional dichotomy: either avoiding crypto entirely or concentrating exposure solely on Bitcoin.

Author: Claude, Deep Chao TechFlow

Deep Chao Insight: Bitcoin fell below $77,000 on Monday, retreating to its opening level from May 1st, wiping out half a month's gains within 48 hours. The triggers overlapped densely: U.S. April PPI surged 6% year-over-year, hitting a three-year high; Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a weekly net outflow exceeding $1 billion, ending six consecutive weeks of inflows; the crypto market saw $657 million in liquidations within 24 hours. While retail investors fled in panic, Strategy Group bucked the trend, spending $2 billion to add nearly 25,000 BTC. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs liquidated all its XRP and Solana ETF holdings in Q1, slashed its Ethereum exposure by 70%, and retained only $700 million in Bitcoin ETFs. Institutional choices are becoming increasingly clear: either avoid crypto entirely, or only touch Bitcoin.

Bitcoin briefly dropped to $76,551 during Monday's Asian trading session, its lowest level since May 1st. According to a Bloomberg report on May 18th, widespread risk aversion triggered by Middle East tensions prompted traders to slash positions significantly, with the crypto market seeing nearly $500 million in liquidations within 15 minutes.

What does this price signify? On May 1st, Bitcoin opened around $76,306. Over the following two weeks, it climbed to above $82,000, then declined for four consecutive trading days, erasing all of May's gains. For traders who chased the rally mid-month, turning from floating profits to floating losses within 48 hours happened too fast to react.

PPI Soars 6% Year-Over-Year, Hitting Three-Year High, Rate Hike Probability Rises to 39%

The fuse that ignited this round of selling was the U.S. April Producer Price Index (PPI) released on May 13th. According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, PPI rose 1.4% month-over-month, the largest monthly increase since March 2022; it surged 6% year-over-year, the highest level since December 2022, far exceeding market expectations of 4.9%.

Energy prices were the main driver. Gasoline prices jumped 15.6% month-over-month in April, diesel prices rose 12.6%, and the impact of the Iran conflict on the energy complex is transmitting down the supply chain. Even excluding food and energy, the core PPI still rose 1% month-over-month and reached 5.2% year-over-year, indicating price pressure is no longer confined to the pump.

High Frequency Economics Chief Economist Carl Weinberg warned after the PPI report that the data would sound alarms at both the Federal Reserve and financial markets. The CME FedWatch tool shows the market's pricing for a 25 basis point rate hike this year has risen to about 39%, with expectations for a rate cut this year largely eliminated.

Just one day before the PPI data, April CPI rose to 3.8% year-over-year, the highest since May 2023. According to CNN, several economists raised their forecasts for May CPI after the PPI release, expecting it to exceed 4%. The transmission of wholesale prices to the consumer end is accelerating.

ETF Six-Week Inflow Streak Ends, Weekly Net Outflow Exceeds $1 Billion

Macro pressures quickly transmitted to the institutional capital level. According to SoSoValue data, for the week ending May 15th, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a net outflow of approximately $1 billion, ending six consecutive weeks of net inflows. A CoinShares report on May 18th showed digital asset investment products overall saw a net outflow of $1.07 billion, the third-largest weekly outflow of 2026.

James Butterfill, Head of Research at CoinShares, stated this shift "may reflect geopolitical risk aversion triggered by developments related to Iran."

The total net inflow over the previous six weeks was about $3.4 billion, averaging about $568 million per week, with April alone seeing inflows of $1.97 billion, the strongest monthly performance of 2026. This accumulation was reversed intensively this week. May 13th saw a single-day net outflow of $635 million, the largest daily decline of the week; on May 15th, none of the 11 Bitcoin ETFs recorded positive inflows, with another $290 million outflow.

Ethereum spot ETFs also suffered five consecutive days of outflows, with a weekly net outflow of $255 million. By the weekend, Bitcoin ETF cumulative net inflows still stood at $58.34 billion, with total assets under management around $104.29 billion.

$657 Million in Liquidations, 89% Long Positions

As ETF capital fled, the derivatives market experienced a brutal long squeeze. According to Coinglass data, total crypto market liquidations within 24 hours reached $657 million, with long positions accounting for about 89%. According to bitcoin.com, $584 million came from long positions. The Fear & Greed Index plummeted from a neutral 50 a few days earlier to 29, entering the fear zone.

The domino effect of leveraged liquidations accelerated the decline. Bitcoin triggered a large number of stop-loss and forced liquidation orders after breaking below key support, forming a "liquidation → selling → more liquidation" spiral. LMAX crypto strategist Joel Kruger described this process as "forced position closures and position washouts" pushing Bitcoin below key technical support.

Bitcoin is currently hovering in the $76,000 to $76,800 range, with the 50-day moving average around $76,716 providing short-term support, and the 200-day moving average around $83,513 acting as resistance above.

Strategy Group Adds 20,000 BTC Against the Trend, Saylor Not Reading the Same Sentiment Report

While retail investors were liquidated and ETFs bled, Strategy Group (formerly MicroStrategy) operated in the opposite direction during the same period.

According to an 8-K filing with the SEC on May 18th, the company purchased 24,869 Bitcoin for approximately $2.01 billion between May 11th and 17th, at an average price of $80,985. This transaction brought Strategy's total holdings to 843,738 BTC, with a total cost of about $63.87 billion and an average price of around $75,700. This purchase was primarily funded through the sale of STRC preferred stock.

Strategy also disclosed that its "BTC yield" for the year-to-date 2026 (a metric measuring Bitcoin holdings relative to diluted share count growth) reached 12.6%.

This isn't the first time Saylor has added during market panic. Throughout 2026, Strategy has maintained a near-weekly or bi-weekly purchase rhythm, regardless of market ups and downs. From January to May, the company increased its holdings from about 560,000 BTC to over 840,000, adding nearly 60,000 new BTC per month on average. In the same week everyone was watching PPI data and ETF outflow data, he spent another $2 billion buying.

Goldman Sachs Liquidates XRP and Solana ETFs in Q1, Keeps Only Bitcoin

If Strategy's actions represent the "Bitcoin maximalist" stance, Goldman Sachs' Q1 13F holdings report presents a more representative institutional choice.

According to Goldman's latest Q1 2026 13F report, the bank completely liquidated all its XRP and Solana ETF holdings in the first quarter. At the end of the previous quarter, Goldman held about $154 million in XRP-related ETFs (distributed across issuers like Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, Grayscale, and 21Shares), and over $100 million in Solana-related ETFs. Now both positions are zero.

Ethereum ETF exposure was cut by about 70%, reduced from previous levels to around $114 million. The Bitcoin ETF position remained largely unchanged at around $700-720 million, with only a slight reduction of about 10%.

At the same time, Goldman increased its holdings in crypto infrastructure stocks: Circle holdings increased 249%, Galaxy Digital holdings increased 205%, and Coinbase also saw an increase. The signal from this set of actions is clear: Goldman hasn't exited crypto, but is narrowing its bets—shifting from "casting a wide net" back to "BTC-only."

According to a CCN report, the Harvard University Endowment also reduced its Bitcoin ETF holdings by 43% during the same period and completely exited Ethereum ETFs. Institutions are synchronizing a concentration of their crypto exposure by asset type.

Related Questions

QWhat are the main factors cited as triggers for the recent sharp decline in Bitcoin's price?

AThe main triggers are the higher-than-expected US Producer Price Index (PPI) report showing a 6% year-over-year increase, leading to heightened expectations of potential Federal Reserve rate hikes. This macroeconomic pressure coincided with a shift in institutional fund flows, marked by US spot Bitcoin ETFs seeing their first net outflow in six weeks, exceeding $1 billion. Additionally, significant liquidations in the derivatives market, with $657 million in positions forcibly closed, accelerated the downward price movement.

QHow did the investment behavior of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) contrast with the general market trend during the sell-off?

AStrategy engaged in significant contrarian buying during the market sell-off. According to its SEC filing, the company purchased 24,869 BTC for approximately $2.01 billion between May 11 and May 17, at an average price of $80,985 per Bitcoin. This increased its total holdings to 843,738 BTC. This action demonstrates a consistent strategy of accumulating Bitcoin regardless of short-term price volatility, directly opposing the trend of retail panic selling and ETF outflows.

QWhat significant change did Goldman Sachs make to its cryptocurrency portfolio in Q1 2026, according to its 13F report?

AAccording to its Q1 2026 13F report, Goldman Sachs made a significant shift towards concentrating its crypto exposure primarily on Bitcoin. The bank completely liquidated its entire holdings of XRP and Solana ETFs. It also reduced its Ethereum ETF exposure by approximately 70%. Meanwhile, it largely maintained its Bitcoin ETF holdings at around $700-$720 million, making only a minor ~10% reduction. The report indicates a strategic move from a diversified crypto portfolio to a more focused 'BTC-only' stance among cryptocurrency investments.

QWhat was the impact of the recent market downturn on leveraged traders in the cryptocurrency market?

AThe market downturn led to massive liquidations for leveraged traders. Within 24 hours, total liquidations across the crypto market reached $657 million. A vast majority of these, approximately 89% or $584 million, were long positions that were forcibly closed. This created a cascading effect where initial liquidations triggered further selling, leading to more stop-losses and liquidations, which accelerated the price decline and pushed the market fear and greed index from a neutral 50 into the 'fear' territory at 29.

QWhat does the article suggest is the emerging institutional consensus regarding cryptocurrency investment, based on the actions of firms like Goldman Sachs?

AThe article suggests an emerging institutional consensus of strategic concentration on Bitcoin. The actions of Goldman Sachs—exiting other major altcoins like XRP and Solana while maintaining core Bitcoin exposure—are presented as a representative example. The trend indicates that major institutions are moving away from a 'broad exposure' approach to a more selective one. The implied consensus is: if institutions are to engage with crypto assets at all, they are increasingly choosing to focus their bets primarily or exclusively on Bitcoin, viewing it as the core, foundational asset in the space.

Related Reads

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手29m ago

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手29m ago

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit1h ago

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit1h ago

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opportunities in over a decade. Key developments to watch include Chair Warsh's first FOMC meeting, upcoming inflation data, Treasury auction demand, and whether the 30-year yield approaches 6%, a level that could trigger a more sustained equity valuation reset. The bond market's message is clear: the era of cheap government borrowing is over, posing a central challenge for markets in late 2026.

marsbit1h ago

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbit1h ago

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

The article "Is Strategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Decoding 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment" analyzes why companies might sell their bitcoin holdings, arguing it's not necessarily negative. It begins by noting the market's surprise at Strategy's potential sale, contrasting its previous "never sell" stance. The core argument is that corporate decisions prioritize shareholder value, and selling bitcoin can be a rational strategic choice. The article outlines five key financial reasons for such sales: 1. **Increase Bitcoin Holdings Per Share:** Companies can use proceeds from bitcoin sales to repurchase shares when the stock price is undervalued relative to its bitcoin assets. This reduces the outstanding share count, potentially increasing the bitcoin amount backing each remaining share. 2. **Optimize Capital Structure & Reduce Financing Costs:** Building cash reserves through bitcoin sales can improve credit ratings (as favored by agencies like S&P), leading to lower future borrowing costs. Repaying debt with sale proceeds also reduces financial leverage. 3. **Legitimate Tax Planning:** In the absence of wash-sale rules for bitcoin in the US, companies can sell to realize capital losses, then repurchase, lowering the tax basis of their holdings and creating tax offsets. 4. **Counter Negative Market Narratives:** A controlled, non-disruptive sale could demonstrate market resilience and disprove fears that corporate selling would crash the market, thereby normalizing bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset. 5. **Repurchase Preferred Stock at a Discount:** If a company's preferred stock trades significantly below its face value, using bitcoin sale proceeds to repurchase it can retire expensive liabilities at a profit, saving on future dividend payments. The conclusion emphasizes that bitcoin's monetary properties offer flexibility. Strategic sales can protect corporate and shareholder interests, making asset utilization more important than rigid "hold" mandates.

marsbit1h ago

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片