Bitcoin Continues to Plunge, Whether MSTR Is Forced to Sell Becomes Focus

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-02Last updated on 2026-02-02

Abstract

Bitcoin is experiencing a sharp decline, falling below the key $80,000 level and approaching the cost basis of major institutional holders like MicroStrategy. This has intensified concerns about potential forced liquidations among highly leveraged players. Despite the sell-off, MicroStrategy's executive chairman Michael Saylor signaled intentions to continue accumulating Bitcoin, even as the company raised dividends on its preferred shares to attract capital—a move that could strain cash flow if prices fall further. Analysis indicates that institutional entities, including ETFs and MicroStrategy, now hold approximately 10% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply, with an average acquisition cost around $85,360. At current prices, these positions are underwater, with unrealized losses totaling about $7 billion. The market is facing a crisis of narrative, as the once-bullish "institutional adoption" theme has reversed, with ETF outflows persisting and no new catalysts emerging to attract buyers. The high concentration of institutional holdings, largely at a loss, may now become a source of sustained selling pressure.

Written by: Ye Zhen

Source: Wall Street Insights

Bitcoin is undergoing a severe stress test on institutional holdings. As the price falls below key psychological levels, approaching the cost basis of major institutional holders like MicroStrategy, market concerns over liquidity for highly leveraged holders are rapidly intensifying.

Over the weekend, Bitcoin broke below the $80,000 mark, hitting its lowest level since April 7, 2025. This round of selling occurred against a backdrop of significantly thin market liquidity, further exacerbating Bitcoin's recent cumulative decline of over 30%.

Despite the gloomy market sentiment, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor still posted a picture with the words "More Orange" on social media platform X on Sunday, hinting at continued accumulation. The company announced a 25 basis point increase in the dividend for its Series A Perpetual Extension Preferred Shares (STRC) to 11.25%, intending to attract capital with high financing costs to maintain its Bitcoin acquisition strategy. However, analysis points out that if the coin price continues to stagnate or falls below its cost basis, the high dividend payments could trigger a severe cash flow squeeze.

Jim Bianco, Macro Strategist at Bianco Research, analyzed that the Bitcoin market is facing a crisis of narrative exhaustion. The current market structure is highly institutionalized, with ETF investors and MicroStrategy collectively controlling about 10% of the circulating supply, and are currently in an overall floating loss position. This suggests that the once market-supportive narrative of "institutional entry" could reverse into a massive source of selling pressure after being trapped at high levels.

Institutional Holdings' Floating Losses Worsen, ETFs See Net Outflow Wave

Jim Bianco's analysis shows that Bitcoin is becoming highly "institutionalized," meaning the market can clearly observe the cost basis and profit/loss status of large capital holdings for the first time. Currently, MicroStrategy and the 11 spot Bitcoin ETFs collectively hold about 10% of the Bitcoin circulating supply, with a combined average purchase cost of approximately $85,360. At the current price, these institutional holdings are facing an overall floating loss of about $8,000 per coin, with total unrealized losses reaching approximately $7 billion.

Among them, spot ETFs have become the core force affecting the supply and demand structure. Data shows that the 11 largest spot Bitcoin ETFs hold 1.29 million Bitcoins, accounting for 6.5% of the total circulating supply, with a market value of about $115 billion. However, the average purchase cost for these ETF investors is as high as $90,200, and the current coin price is about $13,000 lower than their cost basis.

This high-level acquisition structure has led to a typical pro-cyclical effect. Bianco points out that these ETFs have seen net outflows for 10 consecutive trading days. Investors are choosing to redeem after buying high and experiencing a pullback. This capital structure is amplifying the market's downward volatility.

MicroStrategy's Safety Margin Narrows, Aggressive Financing Raises Concerns

As a benchmark for corporate Bitcoin holdings, MicroStrategy's balance sheet is facing its most severe test in months. The company currently holds 712,647 Bitcoins, with an average cost of approximately $76,037. As Bitcoin trades around $78,000, the company's unrealized gains have significantly narrowed to less than 3%.

Despite the thinning safety margin, MicroStrategy shows no signs of retreating. To fund the next phase of purchases, the company adjusted the yield on its STRC product to 11.25%. This return rate represents a huge premium compared to typical corporate bonds, reflecting the company's extreme thirst for capital and the inherent volatility risk of its Bitcoin-centric model. Data shows that since the STRC product's debut in November, sales of this product alone have funded the acquisition of over 27,000 Bitcoins.

Analysis suggests that MicroStrategy is still profitable, but its margin for error has significantly shrunk. If the price falls further, the company will face an overall floating loss. Maintaining such high-cost dividend payments could cause cash flow strain, especially if the Bitcoin price falls below its $76,000 cost "waterline," making this risk particularly acute.

Old Narrative Fails, Market Urgently Needs New Momentum

From a macro perspective, this plunge has intensified the market's weeks-long disappointment. Jim Bianco believes the real problem Bitcoin faces is the lack of a new narrative. The previously high-hoped "Boomer Adoption" story has been fully priced in, or even disproven.

The current market structure shows that ETFs and MicroStrategy not only bought a lot, bought concentratedly, but are also currently trapped overall. Bianco points out that as long as there is no new, sustainable buying narrative, the trend of capital outflows is likely to continue. In this case, the high level of institutionalized holdings, once seen as a positive, may instead become the market's biggest source of pressure. Bitcoin's current problem is not whether anyone bought in the past, but where the next batch of buyers will come from at the current price level.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main concern regarding MicroStrategy as Bitcoin's value continues to decline sharply?

AThe main concern is whether MicroStrategy will be forced to sell its Bitcoin holdings as the price approaches its cost basis, which could trigger a liquidity crisis due to its high leverage and expensive financing costs.

QAccording to Jim Bianco's analysis, what percentage of Bitcoin's circulating supply is controlled by ETFs and MicroStrategy combined, and what is their average purchase cost?

AETFs and MicroStrategy combined control about 10% of Bitcoin's circulating supply, with an average purchase cost of approximately $85,360 per Bitcoin.

QHow has the recent Bitcoin price drop affected the financial position of MicroStrategy specifically?

AMicroStrategy's unrealized gains have narrowed significantly to less than 3%, as Bitcoin's price fell to around $78,000, close to its average cost of $76,037 per Bitcoin, reducing its financial safety margin.

QWhat narrative does Jim Bianco suggest is currently failing in the Bitcoin market, and why?

ABianco suggests the 'Boomer Adoption' narrative is failing because institutional investors, including ETFs and MicroStrategy, are now holding Bitcoin at a loss, and without new, sustainable buying narratives, outflows may continue, turning institutional holdings into a source of selling pressure.

QWhat action has MicroStrategy taken to fund its Bitcoin purchases, and what risk does this involve?

AMicroStrategy increased the dividend on its Series A Perpetual Delay Preferred Shares (STRC) by 25 basis points to 11.25% to attract capital, but this high-cost financing could lead to severe cash flow pressure if Bitcoin's price remains stagnant or falls below its cost basis.

Related Reads

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片