Bitcoin at $70,000: When Will the BTC Decline Stop?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

Bitcoin is steadily declining towards the symbolic $70,000 mark, signaling a deeper issue of waning demand rather than panic selling. On-chain data reveals a structurally bearish market: the Bull Score Index has hit zero, spot volumes are low, and institutional flows have reversed, with US spot Bitcoin ETFs becoming net sellers. The negative Coinbase premium indicates sustained disengagement from US investors, while a contraction in USDT's market cap suggests reduced fresh capital entering the ecosystem. Technically, BTC is trading below its 365-day moving average, with key on-chain support between $60,000 and $70,000. The lack of immediate catalysts, such as Federal Reserve rate cuts, and political uncertainty further dampen sentiment. Bitcoin now behaves like a high-beta tech asset, correlating with equity market pressures. However, current data reflects an absence of buyers rather than excessive selling, potentially setting the stage for slow accumulation if prices reach long-term value zones. The end of the downturn hinges on a gradual return of liquidity and confidence, not just a technical signal.

Bitcoin continues to slide, slowly but surely, towards the symbolic $70,000 zone. After several failed stabilization attempts, the market now seems to be facing a more uncomfortable reality: waning demand. Behind the price drop, on-chain signals tell a deeper story.

Bitcoin Continues Its Fall and Approaches $70,000

For several weeks, BTC has been moving in a clearly unfavorable trend. Bounces exist, but they lack follow-through. Every recovery attempt is quickly sold, reflecting less a panic and more a lack of conviction. This is precisely what the latest on-chain data highlights.

CryptoQuant indicators show a market that has entered a structural bear mode. The Bull Score Index has fallen to zero, a level rarely seen outside of outright bearish market phases. Unlike a mere technical correction, participation itself is contracting. Spot volumes remain low, and liquidity is gradually tightening.

The reversal of institutional flows weighs heavily in the equation. US spot Bitcoin ETFs, major drivers of demand in 2025, are now net sellers. This shift creates a demand gap measured in tens of thousands of BTC over a year. The signal is all the more concerning as the Coinbase premium remains negative, suggesting a persistent disengagement from US investors.

Even the stablecoin market sends a clear message. The market capitalization of USDT is declining for the first time since 2023, indicating that fresh money is no longer entering the ecosystem at the same pace. Historically, without monetary expansion or an influx of stablecoins, bullish phases struggle to build.

Technically, the picture remains fragile. Bitcoin is trading below its 365-day moving average, and on-chain valuation zones are converging towards a major support level between $70,000 and $60,000. A zone that could attract buyers, but only if the context is right.

When Will the Bearish Movement on BTC End?

The question is not so much whether Bitcoin can rebound, but under what conditions a lasting floor can form. In the short term, the elements are missing. The market remains dependent on one key factor: overall liquidity.

From a macroeconomic perspective, expectations are clear. Prediction markets largely anticipate a status quo from the Federal Reserve at the April meeting, with little hope for a rate cut before June. This lack of a monetary catalyst limits appetite for risk assets, including Bitcoin.

The political context adds a layer of uncertainty. Recent statements by Donald Trump on monetary policy and his future Fed chair blur the reading of the calendar. Investors hesitate to anticipate a rapid easing, preferring to stay on the sidelines.

In this framework, Bitcoin is behaving more and more like a high-beta technology asset, sensitive to tensions in the stock markets. As long as this correlation persists, every pressure on tech stocks mechanically impacts BTC.

This does not mean an imminent capitulation, however. Glassnode data shows more of a demand vacuum than an excess of selling. In short, the market is not panicking; it is absent. This type of configuration can precede a phase of slow accumulation, especially if prices sink towards long-term value zones.

The end of the bearish movement will therefore depend less on an isolated technical signal and more on a gradual return of liquidity and confidence. On its side, Bitcoin Hyper is a Bitcoin layer-2 in presale that is managing to attract millions of $ in just a few weeks.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price level that Bitcoin is approaching, and what does it symbolize?

ABitcoin is approaching the symbolic zone of $70,000.

QAccording to on-chain data from CryptoQuant, what does a Bull Score Index of zero indicate?

AA Bull Score Index of zero, as shown by CryptoQuant, is a level rarely seen outside of clearly bearish market phases, indicating a structural bear market.

QWhat is the significance of the declining market capitalization of USDT (Tether)?

AThe declining market capitalization of USDT indicates that fresh money is no longer entering the crypto ecosystem at the same pace, which historically makes it difficult to build bullish phases without monetary expansion or an influx of stablecoins.

QWhat major macroeconomic factor is currently limiting appetite for risk assets like Bitcoin?

AThe expectation that the U.S. Federal Reserve will maintain the status quo on interest rates, with little hope for a rate cut before June, is a key macroeconomic factor limiting appetite for risk assets like Bitcoin.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary driver needed to end the current bearish movement in Bitcoin, rather than a specific technical signal?

AThe end of the bearish movement depends less on an isolated technical signal and more on a gradual return of liquidity and confidence to the market.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片