Behind NEAR's Doubling: Three Major Trends Fueling Its Price Surge

链捕手Published on 2026-05-26Last updated on 2026-05-26

Abstract

NEAR's price has recently doubled, driven by three key catalysts. First, its strong AI narrative: co-founder Illia Polosukhin co-authored the foundational Transformer paper, and NEAR has integrated AI into its super-app, positioning it as decentralized AI infrastructure. Second, it has evolved into a privacy-focused chain, launching features like Confidential Payments to enable private cross-chain transfers, balancing privacy with usability for institutional and DeFi users. Third, its tokenomics are bolstered by a buyback mechanism: with full circulation achieved and inflation halved, fees from the NEAR Intents layer are used to repurchase NEAR tokens, reducing sell pressure. Combined with a recovering TVL exceeding $80 million, these factors are fueling NEAR's current market outperformance.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 25, the price of NEAR, the native token of the NEAR protocol, stands at $2.37. Since early May, NEAR has surged from a low of $1.24 to a high of $2.5, with its market capitalization returning above $3 billion. While mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin have been fluctuating, NEAR has charted its own independent upward trajectory, emerging as one of the brightest performing tokens alongside others like ZEC, ONDO, and HYPE. What are the underlying reasons for this breakout?

The AI Narrative

NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a seasoned professional in the AI field. Illia is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, alongside others like Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer from Google Brain / Google Research. This paper introduced the Transformer architecture, which relies entirely on attention mechanisms, significantly improving parallel training efficiency and model scale. It is the foundational framework for all major contemporary large models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

NEAR has made AI a core strategy from its early days. In February of this year, NEAR officially launched the Near.com super-app, integrating cross-chain swaps, privacy tools, and smart contract management into one platform with built-in AI capabilities, supporting autonomous agent application scenarios. In November 2023, Illia also formally assumed the role of NEAR Foundation CEO, focusing the strategy primarily around the AI narrative.

In May, Nvidia's earnings report spurred a broader recovery in the AI sector, with NEAR being viewed as a representative of decentralized AI infrastructure, alongside tokens like TAO.

On May 22, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, in an article, grouped NEAR with HYPE and ZEC in a call for attention, directly igniting market sentiment.

Privacy-Focused Blockchain

Blockchain has long faced the privacy dilemma where 'transparency equals publicity.' The sharp rise of privacy coins like ZEC and XMR has refocused the industry's attention on the privacy sector, leading various protocols, including public blockchains, to start incorporating privacy features.

NEAR was founded in 2018. Its initial core positioning was not AI, but scalability. Its earliest progress primarily revolved around continuously optimizing sharding technology, making it one of the hot 'Ethereum killer' public blockchains at the time.

Because of this, NEAR's public sale on CoinList once crashed the latter's website. During the 2020-2021 bull cycle, NEAR soared from $0.5 to a peak of $20.59, becoming one of the most watched star tokens that year.

However, fast-forwarding to this cycle, the vast majority of older tokens and new VC-backed tokens have been shunned by the market. Therefore, even in this bull cycle, NEAR only reached a high of around $9 in 2024 before declining steadily, hitting a low of $0.84 in 2026.

With the official launch of NEAR Intents, privacy requirements have become critically important. Intents are core to cross-chain transactions, allowing users to execute actions simply by expressing intent. However, large on-chain transactions are vulnerable to MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) attacks when public, a significant drawback for institutions, large holders, and ordinary DeFi users alike.

The NEAR team began planning privacy as a crucial complement to Intents. In late May this year, the NEAR Intents team launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features, supporting private cross-chain transfers for assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. The sender, amount, and path are all hidden, with only the result visible on the target chain, utilizing a private shard + TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridge at the underlying layer.

NEAR also opened a privacy mode, where user balances, transfers, and transaction activities are private by default. Whether for ordinary users, enterprise users, or AI agents executing complex strategies, this prevents data leakage. The Confidential Treasuries (Trezu) launched around the same time further supports private multi-signature wallets, payroll, and cross-chain payments, having already processed $68 million in confidential transactions.

Compared to pure privacy coins like Zcash, NEAR's balance between privacy, usability, and cross-chain functionality is more practical, directly addressing enterprise-level demand and driving a recovery in TVL and developer activity.

NEAR Intents Fee Buyback

In October 2025, NEAR completed the unlocking of its final batch of initial supply, bringing its circulating supply close to 100%.

NEAR designed a dual mechanism of inflation + burning from its mainnet's early days: a maximum annual inflation of 5% (permanently halved to 2.5% via an upgrade in October 2025), with 90% going to validators as rewards and 10% entering the protocol treasury. Entering 2026, the project has no major unlock events or linear unlocks remaining, only the regular epoch reward emissions (approximately 5.4 million NEAR released in the last 30 days, about 0.4% of total supply).

In addition, the fee revenue generated by NEAR Intents is used to directly buy back NEAR tokens on the market, also creating significant buying pressure.

NEAR's intent-driven cross-chain transaction layer on the protocol allows users to simply express their desired outcome (e.g., swapping BTC for SOL), and it provides the optimal execution path, supporting multiple chains without the need for bridging/wrapped assets and featuring low fees.

NEAR Intents previously had two fee components: protocol fees and distribution fees (shared with third-party integrators). However, protocol fees now entirely go into the buyback path. The repurchased NEAR isn't necessarily burned immediately; instead, after being bought back, it is staked, locked, or removed from liquidity. It still counts towards the total supply but reduces circulating supply pressure while also earning staking rewards.

According to the latest data from defiLlama, the TVL of NEAR Intents has exceeded $80 million, with its daily generated fees fluctuating around $100,000, translating to a monthly buyback amount of approximately $3 million.

At the end of this month, its core development team, Near One, also announced the latest technical progress. The team plans to release dynamic resharding by the end of Q2 2026 to significantly enhance scalability. Additionally, the team will introduce NEAR's post-quantum secure signature scheme and perform upgrades in June this year, improving its resistance to quantum computing.

Related Questions

QWhat are the three main catalysts driving NEAR's recent price surge according to the article?

AThe three main catalysts are: 1) AI Narrative, due to co-founder Illia Polosukhin's AI background and NEAR's strategic focus. 2) Privacy Public Chain, through features like Confidential Payments and Intents. 3) NEAR Intents fee buybacks, which reduce circulating supply.

QWho is Illia Polosukhin and what is his significance in the AI field?

AIllia Polosukhin is a co-founder of NEAR. He is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, which introduced the Transformer architecture that forms the foundation of modern large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

QWhat specific privacy features did NEAR Intents launch in May, and what problem do they solve?

AIn May, NEAR Intents launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features. They solve the privacy problem for cross-chain transfers by hiding the sender, amount, and transaction path across 35+ chains, protecting users from MEV attacks and data leaks during large or complex transactions.

QHow does the NEAR Intents fee buyback mechanism work and what is its impact?

AFees generated by the NEAR Intents protocol are used to buy back NEAR tokens from the market. These bought-back tokens are then staked, locked, or removed from liquidity. This reduces selling pressure on the circulating supply and creates consistent buy-side demand, with current monthly buybacks estimated around $3 million.

QWhat are the key upcoming technical upgrades mentioned for NEAR in the article?

AThe key upcoming upgrades are: 1) Dynamic Resharding, to be released at the end of Q2 2026, which will significantly improve scalability. 2) A post-quantum secure signature scheme, planned for introduction and upgrade in June of this year, to enhance its resistance to quantum computing attacks.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报3m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报3m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News20m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News20m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit48m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片