Base Native Leveraged Prediction Market OmenX Officially Launches on Mainnet

链捕手Published on 2026-05-19Last updated on 2026-05-19

Abstract

Base-native leveraged prediction market platform OmenX has officially launched on mainnet. It currently supports up to 5x leverage, with plans to increase to 10x based on platform liquidity and market conditions. Unlike traditional prediction markets where users fully collateralize YES/NO positions and wait for settlement, OmenX aims to create a trading platform-like experience. Users can open leveraged positions on event outcomes, and actively trade, adjust, or hedge these positions before the event concludes for greater capital efficiency. Alongside the mainnet launch, OmenX introduced a "Hedge-to-Earn" campaign targeting existing users of other prediction markets (initially Polymarket). This initiative allows users to claim incentives or hedging benefits on OmenX based on their existing positions, aiming to introduce them to leveraged trading and active risk management. OmenX positions itself as a derivatives trading platform for prediction market assets. The team believes that as platforms like Polymarket mainstream prediction markets, event outcomes are becoming a new tradable asset class. The next phase of demand will focus on leverage, liquidity, and advanced trading tools. Post-launch, OmenX plans to expand supported market types, optimize liquidity, and develop APIs and additional trading tools. The team is also in discussions with investors and partners to secure resources for further development.

Recently, the Base-native leveraged prediction market platform OmenX announced its official launch on the mainnet. As one of the earlier leveraged prediction market products to be officially launched and put into operation in the market, OmenX currently supports up to 5x leverage and will gradually increase this to 10x leverage in the future, based on platform liquidity, risk control, and market operating conditions.

Unlike traditional prediction markets where users primarily buy YES/NO positions through full-collateral methods and wait for final settlement, OmenX aims to further advance the prediction market experience towards a trading platform model. Users can establish leveraged positions around event outcomes, and before the event concludes, they can buy, sell, and adjust their positions, thereby expressing market views, managing risks, and participating in event trading with higher capital efficiency.

Accompanying the mainnet launch, OmenX simultaneously introduced the Hedge-to-Earn campaign. This campaign targets users who already hold positions on other prediction market platforms, allowing them to claim related hedging benefits or incentives on OmenX based on their existing prediction market positions. The initial phase of the campaign already supports positions from Polymarket.

The core logic of Hedge-to-Earn is: users with existing prediction market positions already possess real event exposure and trading intent. OmenX helps these users try new event trading methods at a lower cost by providing a hedging entry point and a leveraged trading experience. Compared to educating ordinary users from scratch, OmenX hopes to start with users who already understand prediction markets, encouraging them to move further from one-way position holding towards hedging, adjustment, and active trading.

OmenX positions itself as a derivatives trading platform specializing in prediction market assets. The team believes that as platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi push prediction markets towards mass adoption, event outcomes are gradually becoming a new tradable asset class. In the next stage, market demand for prediction assets will no longer be limited to "buy and wait for the result," but will further extend to leverage, liquidity, risk management, capital efficiency, and trading infrastructure.

Following the mainnet launch, OmenX will continue to expand the types of event markets supported, optimize liquidity and trading experience, and plans to advance API integration, ecosystem partnerships, and the development of more trading tools. The team also stated that as the product enters the real trading phase, OmenX is in discussions with multiple investment institutions, ecosystem funds, and strategic partners regarding the next phase of development, hoping to introduce more long-term capital and ecosystem resources to jointly promote the growth of the leveraged prediction market.

About OmenX

OmenX is a Base-native leveraged prediction market platform dedicated to upgrading prediction market assets into event markets with greater capital efficiency and trading attributes. Users can establish leveraged positions around high-profile events in crypto, macroeconomics, sports, politics, and other areas, and flexibly buy, sell, and manage risks before the events conclude.

Official Website: https://www.omenx.com

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit6m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit6m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit13m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit13m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News18m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News18m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit25m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit25m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit34m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot