All about Tether’s $150M bet on digital gold and what it means

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-06Last updated on 2026-02-06

Abstract

Tether, the issuer of the dominant stablecoin USDT, is aggressively expanding into the tokenized gold market. Its recent $150 million investment in Gold.com—acquiring a 12% stake—is part of a broader strategy to replicate its stablecoin success with its gold-backed token, XAU₮. The deal includes Gold.com promoting Tether’s stablecoins and investing $20 million in XAU₮. This follows Tether’s pattern of strategic investments, including $100 million in a gold royalties firm and $200 million in financial services platform Antalpha. Tether has also become a major physical gold buyer, acquiring 27 tons in Q4 2025 alone. Despite XAU₮'s market cap nearing $3 billion, it faces strong competition from Paxos Gold (PAXG), which now holds 42% market share compared to Tether’s 47%. Tether’s leadership aims to position the company as a leading “gold central bank,” capitalizing on declining trust in fiat systems.

After sealing its lead on stablecoins, Tether, issuer of the world’s largest on-chain dollar, USDT, is now betting on similar success through tokenized gold.

The firm recently announced a $150 million investment in Gold.com, a well-known platform for the physical retail gold and precious metals market. This highlighted Tether’s broader strategy to scale and replicate its stablecoin-like moat in the physical gold sector.

The deal will let Tether own 3.37 million common shares of Gold.com, or about 12% of the total shares. The deal will also grant it the right to elect a board member on the platform.

According to a statement, the investment will help Gold.com lease some of Tether’s gold facilities.

In return, the platform will invest $20 million in Tether’s tokenized gold, XAUT, and promote its dollar-based stablecoin offerings (USDT and USAT).

“The collaboration is expected to enhance the credibility and distribution of Tether’s gold-backed XAU₮ stablecoin, expand Gold.com’s retail and digital offerings, introduce gold leasing solutions, and drive increased consumer and institutional engagement across both platforms.”

Tether’s bet on digital gold rush

For the unfamiliar, a similar distribution-led strategy was used by the firm to scale USDT into a global dominant player in the USD-denominated stablecoin market.

USDT began on the Bitfinex exchange, which is owned by the same parent firm as Tether. Soon, USDT was listed on Binance, Kraken, Coinbase, and others, eventually becoming the foundation of global crypto liquidity.

Tether is using this tested plan for XAUT, its tokenized gold. In June 2025, the firm invested $100 million in Elemental Altus Royalties, a Canadian-based outlet focusing on gold-linked royalties.

Similarly, in October 2025, it poured $200 million into Antalpha, a financial services platform, to advance custody, lending, and infrastructure for tokenised gold.

To cap it all off, Tether has become the top private gold buyer in 2025, acquiring 27 tons of physical gold in Q4 alone. Interestingly, the firm has also been investing in gold-related media houses, according to a research firm.

All roads lead to XAUT for now. Reacting to the Gold.com investment, Juan Sartori, Head of Special Projects at Tether, said,

“We are strengthening XAU₮’s transparency, scalability, and its ability to move seamlessly between physical and digital markets.”

In fact, even the firm’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, hasn’t shied away from their aggressive gold strategy. He recently told Bloomberg,

“We are soon becoming basically one of the biggest, let’s say, gold central banks in the world.”

Ardoino framed the move as long-term positioning amid weakening trust in the fiat-based monetary system.

Tokenized gold wars – Will Tether lose to Paxos?

XAUT’s market cap rose sharply in late 2025 and early 2026 as gold printed new highs.

However, the gold market’s recent cool-off dragged it below $3 billion and Paxos’s PAX Gold [PAXG] has been aggressively pushing to become a dominant player. At press time, it had a 42% market share compared to Tether’s 47%.

Final Thoughts

Tether’s $150 million investment and recent gold bets mirror early USDT’s scaling strategy.
Paxos Gold’s market share has surged though, threatening to dethrone Tether in the tokenized gold market.

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报3m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报3m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News21m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News21m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit49m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit49m ago

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight News58m ago

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News58m ago

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot