Algorand Foundation cuts 25% of workforce, citing macro and market pressures

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-20Last updated on 2026-03-20

Abstract

The Algorand Foundation has laid off 25% of its workforce, citing macroeconomic environment and a broader crypto market downturn as reasons. The foundation stated this restructuring allows it to sustainably align resources with its long-term goals. This follows similar cuts at other crypto entities like the Hedera Foundation, Blockworks, and Crypto.com, the latter also pointing to AI disruption. Community reaction was mixed, with some criticizing the foundation's leadership and spending. A transparency report noted the AF spent $12 million after selling millions of ALGO tokens, while a critic pointed to a lack of liquidity, users, and funding. Data confirms a significant decline in the chain's activity; its DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) has halved since last year to under $40 million, and daily fees remain below $50. Consequently, the price of ALGO dropped roughly 10% amid a wider market pullback.

The Algorand Foundation (AF), the steward of the Algorand chain, is in the news after it announced it has axed 25% of its workforce.

According to the AF, the restructuring was informed by the ongoing “global macro environment” and “broader downturn in crypto markets.”

Source: X

Following the layoffs, AF now believes it is lean enough to “sustainably align” the remaining resources with the protocol’s long-term goals.

However, the ongoing crypto rout is not affecting Algorand alone. In January, the Hedera Foundation declared some of its core functions redundant and let go of employees who handled them.

Beyond protocols, crypto media has also been hit, with Blockworks axing its entire newsroom last year.

Besides, pressure is also coming from AI adoption, which, like other global segments, is disrupting the crypto market labour sector. This week, crypto exchange Crypto.com let go 12% of its workforce, citing the need to position itself to rising AI capabilities.

That said, the AF layoffs were met with mixed reactions.

Community and ALGO reaction

As expected, a section of the community sympathized with those affected by the AF layoffs and the disrupted livelihoods.

However, one user pointed out that the AF spent $100 million last year and yet, saw no meaningful impact.

He added,

Using macro uncertainty as cover for doing this feels piss weak. Love the tech. Hate the leadership. Same issues as always. No liquidity. No users. No funding. No mindshare.

According to the AF transparency report, it spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens. Its overall expenditure has been around $18 million per year, covering even staff, which includes 65 employees.

However, the critic was right about lagging chain activity. Its stablecoin liquidity has been declining alongside DeFi activity, as shown by the TVL (total value locked) drop.

Source: DeFiLlama

Since last year, DeFi activity has dropped by half, slipping from $80 million to below $40 million. In fact, the chain’s fees have been hovering below $50 throughout last year.

Meanwhile, ALGO was down about 10% and traded at $0.088 at the time of writing, amid a broader pullback following de-risking linked to traders’ caution after the Fed rate decision.


Final Summary

  • Algorand Foundation axed 25% of its workforce, as bear market, geopolitical tensions, and AI disrupted the labor sector in the space.
  • Algorand chain activity has slowed down with DeFi activity by half, generating less than $50 in daily average fees.

Related Questions

QWhy did the Algorand Foundation lay off 25% of its workforce?

AThe Algorand Foundation cited the ongoing 'global macro environment' and 'broader downturn in crypto markets' as reasons for the layoffs.

QHow has the Algorand chain's DeFi activity changed in the past year?

ADeFi activity on the Algorand chain has dropped by half, falling from $80 million to below $40 million in total value locked (TVL).

QWhat was the community's reaction to the Algorand Foundation's decision?

AThe community had mixed reactions. Some sympathized with the affected employees, while others criticized the leadership for poor performance, citing a lack of liquidity, users, funding, and mindshare despite significant spending.

QHow much did the Algorand Foundation spend according to its transparency report as of September 2025?

AAccording to its transparency report, the Algorand Foundation spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens, with an overall annual expenditure of around $18 million.

QWhat other companies in the crypto space have recently announced layoffs?

AOther companies that have recently announced layoffs include the Hedera Foundation, which declared some core functions redundant, crypto media outlet Blockworks, which axed its entire newsroom last year, and Crypto.com, which let go of 12% of its workforce citing the need to adapt to rising AI capabilities.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit3m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit3m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit22m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit22m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit31m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片