Algorand Foundation cuts 25% of workforce, citing macro and market pressures

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-20Last updated on 2026-03-20

Abstract

The Algorand Foundation has laid off 25% of its workforce, citing macroeconomic environment and a broader crypto market downturn as reasons. The foundation stated this restructuring allows it to sustainably align resources with its long-term goals. This follows similar cuts at other crypto entities like the Hedera Foundation, Blockworks, and Crypto.com, the latter also pointing to AI disruption. Community reaction was mixed, with some criticizing the foundation's leadership and spending. A transparency report noted the AF spent $12 million after selling millions of ALGO tokens, while a critic pointed to a lack of liquidity, users, and funding. Data confirms a significant decline in the chain's activity; its DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) has halved since last year to under $40 million, and daily fees remain below $50. Consequently, the price of ALGO dropped roughly 10% amid a wider market pullback.

The Algorand Foundation (AF), the steward of the Algorand chain, is in the news after it announced it has axed 25% of its workforce.

According to the AF, the restructuring was informed by the ongoing “global macro environment” and “broader downturn in crypto markets.”

Source: X

Following the layoffs, AF now believes it is lean enough to “sustainably align” the remaining resources with the protocol’s long-term goals.

However, the ongoing crypto rout is not affecting Algorand alone. In January, the Hedera Foundation declared some of its core functions redundant and let go of employees who handled them.

Beyond protocols, crypto media has also been hit, with Blockworks axing its entire newsroom last year.

Besides, pressure is also coming from AI adoption, which, like other global segments, is disrupting the crypto market labour sector. This week, crypto exchange Crypto.com let go 12% of its workforce, citing the need to position itself to rising AI capabilities.

That said, the AF layoffs were met with mixed reactions.

Community and ALGO reaction

As expected, a section of the community sympathized with those affected by the AF layoffs and the disrupted livelihoods.

However, one user pointed out that the AF spent $100 million last year and yet, saw no meaningful impact.

He added,

Using macro uncertainty as cover for doing this feels piss weak. Love the tech. Hate the leadership. Same issues as always. No liquidity. No users. No funding. No mindshare.

According to the AF transparency report, it spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens. Its overall expenditure has been around $18 million per year, covering even staff, which includes 65 employees.

However, the critic was right about lagging chain activity. Its stablecoin liquidity has been declining alongside DeFi activity, as shown by the TVL (total value locked) drop.

Source: DeFiLlama

Since last year, DeFi activity has dropped by half, slipping from $80 million to below $40 million. In fact, the chain’s fees have been hovering below $50 throughout last year.

Meanwhile, ALGO was down about 10% and traded at $0.088 at the time of writing, amid a broader pullback following de-risking linked to traders’ caution after the Fed rate decision.


Final Summary

  • Algorand Foundation axed 25% of its workforce, as bear market, geopolitical tensions, and AI disrupted the labor sector in the space.
  • Algorand chain activity has slowed down with DeFi activity by half, generating less than $50 in daily average fees.

Related Questions

QWhy did the Algorand Foundation lay off 25% of its workforce?

AThe Algorand Foundation cited the ongoing 'global macro environment' and 'broader downturn in crypto markets' as reasons for the layoffs.

QHow has the Algorand chain's DeFi activity changed in the past year?

ADeFi activity on the Algorand chain has dropped by half, falling from $80 million to below $40 million in total value locked (TVL).

QWhat was the community's reaction to the Algorand Foundation's decision?

AThe community had mixed reactions. Some sympathized with the affected employees, while others criticized the leadership for poor performance, citing a lack of liquidity, users, funding, and mindshare despite significant spending.

QHow much did the Algorand Foundation spend according to its transparency report as of September 2025?

AAccording to its transparency report, the Algorand Foundation spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens, with an overall annual expenditure of around $18 million.

QWhat other companies in the crypto space have recently announced layoffs?

AOther companies that have recently announced layoffs include the Hedera Foundation, which declared some core functions redundant, crypto media outlet Blockworks, which axed its entire newsroom last year, and Crypto.com, which let go of 12% of its workforce citing the need to adapt to rising AI capabilities.

Related Reads

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit16m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit16m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit53m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit53m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片