AI Sweeps Everything, Why Are Crypto Builders the Most Secure?

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-20Last updated on 2026-03-20

Abstract

In an era where AI is disrupting industries and causing widespread job displacement, crypto builders are uniquely positioned to thrive. While AI threatens to automate many white-collar and coding jobs, the crypto sector has forged individuals with exceptional adaptability, cross-domain expertise, and rapid learning capabilities. The real issue isn’t that crypto is dying—it’s that AI is commoditizing knowledge-based work globally. True value in AI is captured by infrastructure players like NVIDIA and OpenAI, not by those simply wrapping AI models. In contrast, crypto offers structural advantages: its community operates at high information density, tracks multiple innovation frontiers, and builds non-commoditizable tech like zero-knowledge proofs and quantum-resistant cryptography. Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Cloudflare are investing heavily in crypto infrastructure, signaling real-world demand. The future remains uncertain, but those who build through uncertainty—as seen in past technological revolutions—will define the next era. Crypto builders, equipped with a unique skill set and mindset, are among the best prepared to navigate and lead in the age of AI.

Written by: YQ

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

A current point of debate on Crypto Twitter is: 'Should I stay, or should I go?' The question itself is wrong; it assumes there is a safe place to go, but in reality, there is none.

Goldman Sachs states that 300 million jobs globally will be impacted by AI. The CEO of Anthropic claims that 50% of junior white-collar jobs will disappear within five years. Just in Q1 2026, 45,000 tech workers were laid off.

This is not a problem unique to the crypto industry; it is the Fourth Industrial Revolution arriving at everyone's doorstep.

The panic you feel is real and widespread. And those who find the next direction to build will define the next thirty years.

What I see is this: the crypto industry hasn't made you fragile; it has forged you into the fastest-learning, most cross-domain capable, and most adaptable builders on the planet. The real question is: will you use this ability, or will you discard it to chase a sense of security that simply doesn't exist.

Confronting the Real Problem

The statement 'Crypto is dead for builders' had some merit in 2022. It described a market that no longer exists today.

Behind the same anxiety lies a more brutal, yet more universal truth: AI is commoditizing all work based on existing knowledge and pattern matching.

This is the real fear, not 'crypto has no use cases.' What is truly unsettling is that Claude Code, Codex, Gemini Code Assist are already so powerful that most junior software development roles are being replaced.

Stanford University research confirms: since the launch of ChatGPT, the employment rate for developers aged 22-25 has fallen by 20%. 60% of companies plan to replace employees with AI in 2026. The marginal cost of a competent code agent is approaching zero.

This is not a cryptocurrency problem. This is a problem facing all of human civilization, and it is impacting every industry simultaneously.

Three Types of People Make Money, The Rest Panic

Stripping away the hype, who is *really* making money from AI right now?

First Layer: NVIDIA. NVIDIA's annual revenue is $216 billion; Jensen Huang aims for $1 trillion in annual AI chip revenue by 2027. This is the classic 'selling shovels' logic, proven effective time and again in every transformation.

Second Layer: Major model vendors. OpenAI's annualized revenue is $12.7 billion, targeting $54 billion by 2027. Anthropic's annual recurring revenue is approaching $9 billion, targeting $20-26 billion in 2026. They sell API calls, have recurring revenue, and real profits.

Third Layer: Fearmongers. Short video creators, course sellers, make money by telling you 'AI will replace you.' The content is fear, the product is a $99 course, with extremely high profit margins.

Everyone else is searching for a moat, but finding none. A good idea gets copied by hundreds of companies within days of launch. If the profits are attractive enough, OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google will step in and launch their own version.

Manus was the first general AI agent, then Claude launched Cowork, followed by OpenClaw open-sourcing the entire concept, garnering 219k stars on GitHub. The window from 'innovation' to 'commoditization' is now measured in weeks.

A dangerous signal: if your moat is just 'a nice interface wrapped around a large model,' then you have no moat. The marginal cost of wrapping models is approaching zero. The real barrier in the AI field lies in controlling the infrastructure that large models rely on, not piling features on top of them.

Why Crypto Builders Actually Have a Unique Advantage

Set aside shallow narratives like 'crypto is dead' and ask: how much better off is any other field?

Compared to SaaS? All features will be copied by AI overnight. Compared to consulting? Agents are replacing analysts. Compared to junior dev roles? Employment has fallen 20% in two years.

Crypto builders possess structural advantages that other tech fields lack.

One point is particularly important: the crypto crowd has the highest information density in the tech circle. They track cryptography, distributed systems, macroeconomics, geopolitics, oil, gold, AI, biotech, longevity tech, SpaceX, and all cultural hotspots.

Why? Because they are betting on it. Meme coins, prediction markets, new token offerings... Speculation is not a flaw; it is the fastest learning mechanism humans have invented. By the time traditional industries catch on to a trend, crypto builders have already built the infrastructure for it and moved on to the next big thing.

And technical barriers aren't just talk; they are measurable. The Ethereum Foundation has elevated post-quantum cryptographic security to its highest strategic priority. Vitalik's 'Ethereum Simplification' roadmap places 'full quantum resistance' at its core. Zero-knowledge proof systems, Poseidon hash functions, lattice-based cryptography...

Claude Code can easily crush CRUD apps, but it's far less effective when writing recursive SNARK circuits or designing validator penalty mechanisms with game-theoretic guarantees.

The Fact Everyone is Ignoring

Watch actions, not sentiment. Those actually doing things are giving an answer completely opposite to the doomsayers on Crypto Twitter with their actions.

Stripe won't integrate a dying protocol. BlackRock won't issue a staked ETH ETF in a dead market. Cloudflare won't co-found a payments foundation for an industry with no future.

Hype is not demand; adoption is demand. These giants are voting with their feet.

Pandora's Box is Open

Sam Altman cannot predict what GPT-6 will bring. Dario Amodei built a lab focused on safety yet still admits half of junior jobs will disappear. Sundar Pichai reorganized all of Google to pivot entirely to AI.

The people building these technologies don't know what the future holds. No one knows.

Only three things are certain:

  • The box won't close. AI will get stronger, code agents will get better, white-collar automation will accelerate. We are not going back to an era of all hand-written code. The question is not how to escape, but how you position yourself.
  • New tools create new professions. In 1995, no one foresaw 'social media manager.' In 2005, no one foresaw 'cloud architect.' Today, no one can predict the AI-native professions of 2030. But every industrial revolution has created more jobs than it destroyed, without exception.
  • Builders during the panic will dominate the next era. Amazon was born amidst the skepticism of the dot-com bubble; Stripe was founded when payments were 'already solved'; Coinbase started when Bitcoin was a joke.

When everyone feels 'now is not the time to build,' it is precisely the signal that it is the best time to build.

Your Choice

For doing old things, this is the worst of times. For trying new things, this is the best of times.

Don't leave the industry just because Crypto Twitter is full of anxiety. *Everyone* is anxious. Financial analysts are anxious. SaaS founders are anxious. Junior engineers at Google are anxious.

The difference is: the crypto industry has endowed you with a set of capabilities most builders don't have: all-weather cross-domain pattern recognition, a permissionless innovation sandbox, lean teams that can launch quickly without approval, and the community that absorbs new technologies the fastest globally.

Follow your genuine interest. Not because it's a comforting platitude, but because in a world where no one knows the future, the only reliable signal is whether you genuinely care about this thing, whether you are willing to persevere through difficult times.

And difficult times will come for everyone, for every industry.

Pandora's box is open; it cannot be closed. Pick up the new tools and move to the frontier. Those who persist in building amidst the panic will ultimately define the next era.

Related Questions

QWhy does the article argue that crypto builders are uniquely positioned during the AI revolution?

AThe article argues that crypto builders possess structural advantages such as high information density, cross-domain adaptability, and experience in fast-paced, permissionless innovation. They are skilled in complex areas like cryptography and distributed systems, which are less easily automated by AI compared to routine coding tasks.

QAccording to the article, what are the three groups currently profiting from AI?

AThe three groups profiting from AI are: 1) Nvidia (selling AI chips), 2) Major model manufacturers like OpenAI and Anthropic (selling API calls with recurring revenue), and 3) Those selling fear, such as influencers and course sellers capitalizing on AI anxiety.

QWhat is the core fear that the article identifies, beyond the crypto-specific concerns?

AThe core fear identified is that AI is commoditizing all work based on existing knowledge and pattern matching, threatening to replace a vast number of white-collar and junior developer positions across all industries, not just crypto.

QWhat evidence does the article provide to counter the narrative that 'crypto is dead' for builders?

AThe article points to actions from major institutions like Stripe integrating crypto protocols, Blackrock issuing a staking ETH ETF, and Cloudflare co-founding a payment foundation as evidence of real-world demand and long-term confidence, contradicting the superficial narrative.

QWhat is the article's final advice to builders feeling anxiety about the future?

AThe article advises builders to leverage the unique skills they've developed in crypto, such as rapid learning and adaptation, and to continue building new things based on genuine interest, as periods of widespread panic are historically the best times for innovation and defining the next era.

Related Reads

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Tech Stocks Surge for 8 Months, Is the Crypto Community Starting to 'Accept Fate'?

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Has the Community 'Given Up' as Tech Stocks Soar? A recent post on Reddit's r/CryptoMarkets asking if the crypto market feels "dead" compared to surging tech stocks has sparked intense debate. The discussion highlights a community grappling with underperformance: Bitcoin is down ~44% from its October 2025 high and ~20% YTD in 2026, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 have gained significantly. The debate features classic opposing views. Some users, citing Bitcoin's history, are "cycle believers" who anticipate a return to form, arguing it has "died" many times before. Others counter that crypto's narratives keep shifting without delivering a stable, compelling real-world use case beyond speculation. A prevalent third view pinpoints AI as the core issue: the tech sector's transformative boom is absorbing all attention and capital, while crypto lacks a comparable, impactful utility. Data supports the pessimistic mood. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw their largest monthly net outflow in May 2026 (~$2.3B), indicating institutional de-risking. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has fallen to "Fear" levels. When asked about the timing of a potential market rotation back to crypto, answers are uncertain. A key practical point raised is the current high-interest-rate environment, which makes stable yields from cash and bonds attractive, reducing incentive to move into volatile assets like crypto. The underlying anxiety, as one user summarized, is "opportunity cost"—the worry about missing gains elsewhere while waiting for a crypto revival.

marsbit57m ago

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Tech Stocks Surge for 8 Months, Is the Crypto Community Starting to 'Accept Fate'?

marsbit57m ago

Chatbot has been burning money for three years, is it still the 'New Continent' of the AI era?

For years, the AI industry has been guided by a singular "map" — the belief that the AI era's "new continent" would be found in the Chatbot, a super-app akin to the mobile internet's super-apps. This belief was fueled by ChatGPT's explosive 2022 debut. However, three years of heavy investment reveal a different reality: the Chatbot-as-ultimate-entry-point model is struggling. The core issue is economic. Chatbots defy traditional internet economics. Unlike apps with near-zero marginal cost, each AI query consumes significant, expensive compute. More users mean higher costs, not profits. OpenAI, despite ~900M weekly active users, reportedly loses money. The expected network effects and data flywheels that power internet giants are weak in Chatbots, as one user's interactions don't improve another's experience. Monetization is a major hurdle. The subscription model faces low conversion rates, especially in China where users expect AI to be free. The "free + ads" model also struggles. Chatbot interactions often lack commercial intent, and inserting ads compromises the trust essential for an answer engine. Perplexity's minimal ad revenue and subsequent pivot away from ads highlight this difficulty. Switching between Chatbots is easy, making user loyalty low and competition a potential race to the bottom on price. Data suggests the standalone Chatbot's growth is slowing, and user engagement (avg. ~6 mins/day) pales compared to apps like TikTok. The product form itself is limiting; studies show nearly half of interactions are simple Q&A, trapping AI's potential in a passive, single-turn "cage." A contrasting, more successful path is emerging, exemplified by Anthropic. With over 85% of its ~$30B annualized revenue from enterprises, it focuses on AI as a productivity tool, not a companion. The rise of AI Agents (like OpenClaw) and the integration of AI into existing workflows (e.g., Google's AI Overviews, Apple Intelligence in OS) signal a shift. The future may not be a dominant Chatbot app, but AI embedded seamlessly into social apps, operating systems, and hardware — a capability-layer revolution, not a new distribution container. The conclusion is clear: the old "map" centered on a standalone Chatbot super-app is leading to a dead end. To find the true valuable "continent" of the AI era, the industry must update its navigation to prioritize deep integration, practical utility, and sustainable economics over a generic conversation window.

marsbit1h ago

Chatbot has been burning money for three years, is it still the 'New Continent' of the AI era?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片