AI Bull Market Reprices Everything, Including the 'Male Valuation System' in the Marriage Market

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-05-13Last updated on 2026-05-13

Abstract

The AI boom is redefining value across markets, including the male "valuation system" in the dating scene. A new hierarchy is emerging, based on company valuation, employee income, and industry status within the AI sector. At the top are NVIDIA and SK Hynix employees, dubbed the "T0 version." NVIDIA is the AI world's cash machine, while SK Hynix employees are seeing astronomical bonuses due to HBM demand, making them highly sought-after "AI concept stocks" in Korea's dating market. Next are OpenAI and Anthropic staff, representing the "new elite." Unlike the paper wealth of the past internet boom, these employees are actively realizing significant wealth through stock sales, though their status is considered more volatile. DeepSeek and ByteDance AI team members are rated as "top-tier." Their companies are engaged in fierce talent wars with massive investments, making these employees scarce, high-value players. Samsung and Tencent employees are seen as "NPCs" still searching for their AI "ticket." Samsung has been outpaced by SK Hynix in the memory race, while Tencent's more cautious AI investment contrasts with ByteDance's aggressive strategy, raising questions about their future position. Finally, traditional finance and crypto men are rated at the bottom ("pulled"). Their once-dominant wealth and status are being eclipsed by the new AI-driven economic order and its redistribution of value and opportunity.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

A new form of "hard currency" has recently emerged in the Korean matchmaking market—SK Hynix employees.

Kang Eun-sun, a representative from the Korean matchmaking company Gayeon, candidly stated: "In the past, we would match SK Hynix employees with partners roughly at a B+ level, but now it's unconditionally an A grade." An anonymous Hynix employee even said: "When on blind dates, we usually pretend to work at Samsung Electronics first; we only reveal the truth that we're actually at Hynix when we meet someone with decent character."

The hierarchy of the marriage market, both in Korea and globally, has quietly been rewritten.

If the most sought-after were once "Samsung people", finance guys, and civil servants, then after the AI bull market swept across the globe, the individuals truly being revalued by the market have become:

NVIDIA employees;

SK Hynix engineers;

Researchers at OpenAI and Anthropic;

AI team members at DeepSeek and ByteDance.

The primary market revalues companies, the secondary market revalues stocks, and now the market is starting to revalue "marriageable men".

In light of this, Odaily Planet Daily will compile a "Most Sought-After Marriageable Men Ranking in the AI Era" based on multiple dimensions such as company valuation, employee income, industry status, and wealth potential, for everyone's casual reference.

Explosively Hot: NVIDIA & SK Hynix

If there is a "Tier 0 version" in the current matchmaking market, it almost unquestionably belongs to NVIDIA and SK Hynix.

The former is the biggest "money-printing machine" in the AI world.

With AI computing power demand continuing to explode, NVIDIA has become one of the biggest beneficiaries of the global AI wave. After the US stock market opened yesterday, Nvidia's stock price hit another historic high; simultaneously, Wells Fargo again raised its target price and maintained its "overweight" rating.

A consensus is gradually forming in the capital market: in today's era, GPUs are no longer just chips, but the "oil" of the AI world.

On the other hand, what's driving the collective frenzy in the Korean matchmaking market is the nearly outrageous bonus scale for SK Hynix employees.

Last year, SK Hynix revised its "Performance Sharing (PS)" system, stipulating that 10% of operating profit would be directly allocated to the bonus pool, while also removing the bonus cap.

The result is:

With the soaring demand for HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), Hynix employees' bonuses have entered the "hundred-million won era."

The company's operating profit for fiscal year 2025 reached 47.2 trillion won. Calculating 10% of that, over 30,000 Hynix employees could receive an average bonus of 140 million won (approximately 650,000 RMB).

In the first quarter of this year, the average per-employee bonus had already reached 107 million won, about 500,000 RMB. According to further predictions by the international investment bank Macquarie Securities, SK Hynix's operating profit is expected to soar to 447 trillion won by 2027, with average employee bonuses reaching 1.29 billion won, approximately 6.1 million RMB.

Under such massive rewards, Hynix employees are not only extremely sought-after in the matchmaking market but are even seriously considering "internal matching."

An anonymous employee stated: "Recently, there's a noticeable increase in mutual attention among unmarried employees. After all, the economic synergy of marrying a colleague is too significant. Office romances are now being seriously considered as a strategic option."

When bonuses start to be calculated in "hundreds of millions of won," "office romances" suddenly transform from HR's biggest headache into an act of household asset allocation. Due to performance bonuses being highly tied to attendance, many employees have even begun actively avoiding parental leave. Office couples have expressed: "With hundreds of millions of won in bonuses on the table right now, who can afford to take leave?"

SK Hynix employees are no longer just engineers; they more closely resemble AI-themed stocks in the Korean marriage market.

Therefore, NVIDIA, crowned with the halo of the "world's highest market capitalization company," and SK Hynix, the "bonus myth-making machine," unsurprisingly rank in the first tier of this ranking, with a rating of "Explosively Hot."

Clip from the Korean variety show SNL: "Hynix Uniform as a Luxury Store Pass"

Hot: Anthropic, OpenAI

If NVIDIA and Hynix represent AI infrastructure, then OpenAI and Anthropic represent the hottest "new nobility" of the AI era.

Over the past year, the valuations of both companies have expanded frantically. Simultaneously, employee wealth has also entered the real "realization phase."

Last October, OpenAI completed a staggeringly large employee stock buyback round. According to the Wall Street Journal, over 600 current and former employees cashed out a total of $6.6 billion (approx. 48 billion RMB) in that round. About 75 people hit the cap, receiving $30 million each. After completing a $122 billion financing round at an $852 billion valuation this year, OpenAI has further loosened restrictions on employee stock sales. After another financing round in April, OpenAI recently took a further step to relax employee stock sale limits.

The situation at Anthropic is similar.

This April, Anthropic conducted another employee stock sale at a $350 billion valuation. However, due to employees' reluctance to sell, many investors didn't even manage to secure their expected shares.

Unlike the "paper option" stories of the previous internet era, this round of AI companies has truly started allowing employees to cash out and realize "equity wealth."

In other words: the actual wealth level of these AI company employees has already far exceeded that of most employees at traditional internet giants.

However, compared to stable cash flow "money-printing machines" like NVIDIA and Hynix, OpenAI and Anthropic more resemble "high-volatility, high-growth assets."

Therefore, we temporarily assign them a "Hot" rating.

Elite: Deepseek, ByteDance

One of the biggest changes in a bull market is that global internet companies are once again realizing: the most expensive thing is no longer GPUs, but people, especially AI talent.

Last December, ByteDance was exposed planning to massively increase AI investment; this year, with its AI strategy further upgraded, the scale of its AI-related investments has reached a staggering level of 200 billion RMB.

Simultaneously, ByteDance's valuation continues to rise. According to the latest market news, ByteDance's current valuation has surpassed $600 billion, which is $50 billion higher than three months ago.

In April this year, it launched a new round of employee stock buybacks. The repurchase price for current employees was raised to $229.5 per share, an appreciation of 14.52% from the previous price; the repurchase price for former employees was set at $201.96 per share, an appreciation of about 11.97% from the previous round, leading to another significant increase in employees' paper wealth.

On the other side, DeepSeek is also initiating its own "AI talent defense war."

As some core personnel have gradually left, DeepSeek's Liang Wenfeng also needs to use equity to retain his core team.

In May, market rumors first emerged that DeepSeek was seeking financing at a $45 billion valuation; subsequently, news officially surfaced that DeepSeek intended to seek 50 billion RMB in funding.

It's worth noting that according to some reports, of DeepSeek's 50 billion RMB financing quota, only 30 billion RMB would be external financing, with Liang Wenfeng supplementing the remaining 20 billion RMB through internal fundraising. As the boss of the quantitative fund Huan Fang, Liang undoubtedly has the resources, and Huan Fang Fund's 70 billion RMB in assets under management and 58.5% annualized return give him ample confidence.

Clearly, while OpenAI and Anthropic use dollars to retain talent, Chinese AI companies have begun using RMB to wage their own AI talent war.

And in today's market, those who can secure a seat at the main AI table are themselves extremely scarce high-level players.

Therefore, whether from ByteDance or DeepSeek, their employees deserve an "Elite" rating in the matchmaking market.

NPC: Samsung, Tencent

If the companies mentioned earlier have boarded the AI high-speed train, then Samsung Electronics and Tencent are more like players still struggling to find their "AI ticket."

Let's start with Samsung.

For decades, being a "Samsung person" was one of the strongest professional halos in Korean society. But in the AI era, Samsung has unexpectedly become the party being re-evaluated by the market.

Due to missing the early HBM layout, missteps in technology roadmap selection, and product certification issues, Samsung has gradually been suppressed by Hynix in the AI memory competition.

Simultaneously, Samsung employees have also begun "looking towards Hynix." Recently, Samsung's national union even planned a large-scale strike, hoping the company would increase the bonus ratio and remove the bonus cap mechanism. If these demands are not met, the Samsung union will initiate a large-scale strike lasting 18 days (starting May 21). J.P. Morgan estimated this could cause 4 trillion won in losses and reduce DRAM and NAND chip production.

It must be said, it's understandable why the SK Hynix employees in the earlier matchmaking market anecdote "impersonated" Samsung employees.

Negotiations broken down, Samsung's large-scale strike likely finalized.

On the other hand, Tencent isn't having an easy time either.

Compared to ByteDance's aggressive AI investments, Tencent appears more cautious. Previously, Tencent's President Martin Lau stated that the company invested about 18 billion RMB in new AI products last year and would double that this year; however, compared to ByteDance's hundreds of billions of RMB in AI investment, the gap remains significant.

Simultaneously, Tencent also faces slowing growth in its traditional businesses.

On May 13th, Tencent released its Q1 2026 financial report, showing: revenue of 196.458 billion RMB, a 9% year-on-year increase; Non-IFRS operating profit of 75.63 billion RMB, a 9% year-on-year increase. Overall, revenue and profit growth slowed to single-digit levels, with AI investments dragging down short-term gross margin; in gaming performance, domestic market game revenue was 45.4 billion RMB, a 6% year-on-year increase, lagging behind the growth rate of domestic market game gross receipts.

This is also a key reason why Tencent didn't occupy a dominant position in DeepSeek's financing. Earlier media reports stated that Tencent offered to subscribe to up to 20% of DeepSeek's shares, but DeepSeek was reluctant to relinquish a large controlling stake.

This is why the market is increasingly frequently discussing: Has Tencent actually secured the real "ticket" for the AI era?

After all, back in the day, Tencent built the most expensive "Noah's Ark" of the mobile internet era—WeChat; but the new ticket for the AI era, no one knows yet who will ultimately hold it.

Therefore, we temporarily assign Samsung and Tencent employees a rating of "NPC."

Washed Up: Traditional Finance Guys, Crypto Bros

Finally, compared to the AI giant employees above, traditional finance guys and crypto bros are gradually losing their era's dividends.

The reason is quite simple: the most sought-after professions of an era often represent that era's core wealth distribution rights.

For the past few decades: the finance industry represented capital, the internet industry represented traffic; the crypto circle represented overnight riches.

But AI has long begun to redefine everything.

Compared to AI giant teams with bonuses reaching millions and stock cash-outs in the billions of dollars, traditional finance guys and crypto bros suddenly seem somewhat "out of sync with the times."

Especially against the backdrop of the US stock market's ongoing AI transformation, A-shares' structural market conditions, and the crypto circle's loss of new wealth effects, the halos of "financial elites" and "crypto gods" have faded.

Based on the current matchmaking market conditions and elder judgment criteria, the above two categories of people can only be assigned a "Washed Up" rating in the matchmaking market.

Representative avatar of a traditional finance guy

Current state of the crypto bro

Do you think such ratings are reasonable? Do you have other rating references? Feel free to leave your views and opinions in the comments.

Attached is a generator for ratings from Hot to Washed Up: https://tool.dayun.cool/ranking

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, which company's employees have become the new 'hard currency' in the South Korean matchmaking market due to the AI boom?

AAccording to the article, employees of SK Hynix have become the new 'hard currency' in the South Korean matchmaking market.

QWhat is the main factor that has made SK Hynix employees so highly valued, as described in the text?

AThe main factor is their extremely high performance bonuses, which are projected to reach an average of 12.9 billion won (about 6.1 million RMB) per employee by 2027, driven by the explosive demand for HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) in the AI era.

QHow does the article characterize the wealth realization for employees at companies like OpenAI and Anthropic compared to the previous internet era?

AThe article states that unlike the 'paper options' of the previous internet era, AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are allowing employees to actually cash out and realize their 'equity wealth,' with some OpenAI employees reportedly cashing out up to $30 million each.

QWhat rating does the article give to employees of Samsung and Tencent in its 'AI Era Dating Market Ranking,' and why?

AThe article gives employees of Samsung and Tencent a rating of 'NPC.' It's because these companies are seen as still trying to find their 'AI ticket,' facing challenges like Samsung falling behind in HBM competition and Tencent's more cautious AI investment compared to rivals like ByteDance.

QWhat two groups of men are described as having lost their era红利 (红利 meaning红利 or advantage) and received the lowest rating in the article's ranking?

AThe two groups are traditional finance men (金融男) and crypto men (币圈男). They received the lowest rating, described as '拉完了' (pulled finished, meaning having fallen off or lost their appeal).

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit51m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit51m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit2h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片