After Three Years at Multicoin, My Thoughts on Kyle the 'Shill King' Announcing His Exit

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-06Last updated on 2026-02-06

Abstract

Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital, is stepping back from the firm, a move that reflects his strategic focus on pursuing asymmetric, non-consensual bets rather than managing a conventional fund. According to the author, a former Multicoin partner, Samani excelled at identifying and investing in high-conviction, contrarian theses—such as Solana’s potential as a "Nasdaq on-chain"—long before they gained mainstream acceptance. While some have questioned why Multicoin missed certain trends in the current cycle, like leading perpetual DEXs, the author explains that these areas had already become consensus plays, which did not align with Samani’s investment philosophy. His strength lay in early, non-consensus conviction. The author expresses confidence in Multicoin’s remaining team, noting their expertise in on-chain trading, AI, and regulatory strategy. Meanwhile, Samani is expected to explore new ventures, possibly in data-centric businesses. The piece concludes with a personal reflection: everyone has a unique “game” they are meant to play. For Samani, it was asymmetric investing; for the author, it’s building value-transfer protocols. The key is to focus on what one does best and play to win.

Author: mable.sol(Former Multicoin Capital Partner Mable Jiang)

Compiled by: Ken, Chaincatcher

Everyone can only excel at one type of game. You should spend half your time figuring out what game you're good at, and the other half fully focused on playing it well.

Kyle Samani knew exactly what his was.

His strategy was to first develop a theory, then find the right projects—and persistently wait for the theory to be validated (while occasionally assessing if the theory still held). In building a "Nasdaq on-chain" with Solana, he saw this thesis from the very beginning (even though Solana is still some distance from this vision today, that's not the point), and executed this strategy by leading multiple rounds of financing—even participating in discounted OTC rounds long after SOL's mainnet beta launch. He did everything he could to facilitate Solana's development.

His core gamble was in finding asymmetric opportunities, i.e., non-consensus bets. Haseeb was right: probably no one is better at this than Kyle.

People question why Multicoin didn't capture any of the leading perpetual DEXs or related infrastructure this cycle. No one knows better than I do that Multicoin was a firm believer in perpetual DEXs long before anything existed this cycle. Even before many in the industry understood how central limit order books worked—you'd be surprised, but it's true, after all many of us were originally cypherpunks who later adapted to become trading experts (laughs). Multicoin studied basically every perpetual DEX and analyzed the trade-offs. There were many blog posts about the design space and why certain designs were better—you can find them on multicoin.capital.

So why did they "miss" it? Because perpetual DEXs and on-chain liquidity—these are no longer non-consensus bets. Of course, they still have huge growth potential. But consensus bets hold no appeal for Kyle. That was never his game.

And for a fund, the goal is to make money for LPs. So, managing a fund by the book is no longer the game Kyle wants to focus on playing. Running a data company might be something he's interested in—this has never been successfully done before (if you're interested, you can probably listen to the podcast I did with him on FWRD). There are still many asymmetric opportunities in the world waiting to be discovered. Kyle knows his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he's good at and interested in.

No one needs to worry about who is moving on to other fields. When you know what your game is, you should focus on playing it well and aim to win. Winning isn't the entire purpose, but devising a winning strategy is part of the game experience.

Many worry about what Multicoin will be like without Kyle. But I'm not worried, because I know the opportunities ahead for all of us align with the strengths of Tushar, Brian, Spencer, Shayon, Vishal, Matt, Greg, and the rest of the team: on-chain trading, AI, and compliance. As long as the team focuses on playing this game correctly, it will remain top-tier in the industry.

For me, I've been a builder for almost four years now. Looking back, my time at Multicoin was unique—intense debates with Kyle in investment committee meetings, strategic exchanges with Tushar, and exploring the design space of many things with every IC member. I know I can't be as good as any of them, but I've also found my passion and the field of play that belongs to me.

For Kyle, the Web3 dream has turned into nothing but cold ledgers. For me, in this highly commoditized world, these ledgers condense real value transfer. When all other filtering mechanisms completely fail, money becomes the world's only relatively scarce resource to express opinions—and in the near future,恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕极有可能连金钱本身也算不上了。This is why I am building an asset generation protocol (@trendsdotfun).

He and I never needed to agree on what game to play. But we sincerely wish each other well and will cheer for each other from the sidelines.

You only live once, focus on the game you are best at.

I'm just playing games, but I play to win.

Take it easy, but don't slack off.

Related Questions

QWhat was Kyle Samani's core investment strategy at Multicoin Capital according to the author?

AKyle Samani's core strategy was to first develop a theory, then find projects that fit that theory, while persistently waiting for the theory to be validated. He focused on finding asymmetric opportunities and non-consensus bets, such as his early and continued investment in Solana to build a 'Nasdaq on-chain'.

QWhy did Multicoin Capital 'miss' investing in leading perpetual decentralized exchanges (DEXs) this cycle?

AMulticoin missed investing in leading perpetual DEXs because these opportunities were no longer non-consensus bets. While they had significant growth potential, Kyle was not attracted to consensus bets, as that was never his game. The fund had extensively researched perpetual DEXs but chose to focus on asymmetric, non-consensus opportunities instead.

QWhat are the new focus areas for Multicoin Capital after Kyle's departure, as mentioned by the author?

AThe new focus areas for Multicoin Capital are on-chain trading, artificial intelligence, and compliance. The author expresses confidence in the remaining team members, including Tushar, Brian, Spencer, Shayon, Vishal, Matt, and Greg, to excel in these areas.

QWhat personal project is the author, Mable Jiang, building and why?

AMable Jiang is building an asset generation protocol called @trendsdotfun. She believes that in a highly commoditized world, ledgers凝结了真实的价值传输 (condense real value transfer), and money is becoming the only relatively scarce resource to express opinions. Her project aims to address this.

QWhat is the overarching life and career advice the author gives based on her experience with Kyle?

AThe overarching advice is that everyone should spend half their time figuring out what game they are good at and the other half fully focused on playing that game well. The goal is not just to win, but formulating a winning strategy is part of the experience. One should focus on the game they are best at and play to win.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit3m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit3m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit22m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit22m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit31m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片