Aave Founder Reveals: Why is Lending the Core of Financial Empowerment?

比推Published on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

Chain-based lending, which began as an experimental concept around 2017, has grown into a market exceeding $100 billion, primarily driven by stablecoin borrowing secured by crypto-native collateral like Ethereum and Bitcoin. This system enables liquidity release, leveraged strategies, and yield arbitrage. Its success validates the real demand and product-market fit of automated, smart contract-based lending even before institutional adoption. A key advantage of on-chain lending is its significantly lower cost—around 5% for stablecoin loans compared to 7–12% in centralized crypto lending—due to the elimination of financial inefficiencies, intermediaries, and layered fees. This cost reduction stems from open capital aggregation, transparency, composability, and automation, which foster competition and real-time pricing. Innovations like Ethena’s USDe or Pendle integrate seamlessly, expanding the ecosystem without traditional overhead. The evolution follows a pattern seen in major disruptions: serving niche users first, competing on price before quality, and scaling rapidly. While current on-chain lending often recycles existing collateral for similar strategies, future growth depends on incorporating real-world economic value and tokenized assets, not just replicating traditional finance. Traditional lending remains expensive due to inefficiencies in origination, risk assessment, and servicing, misaligned incentives, and regulatory constraints. On-chain lending disrupts this...

Author: Stani.eth

Compiled by: Ken, Chaincatcher

Original title: Aave Founder: Why is Lending the Most Empowering Financial Product?


On-chain lending began around 2017 as a fringe experiment related to crypto assets. Today, it has grown into a market worth over $100 billion, primarily driven by stablecoin lending, largely collateralized by crypto-native assets like Ethereum, Bitcoin, and their derivatives. Borrowers unlock liquidity through long positions, execute leverage loops, and engage in yield arbitrage. The key is not creativity, but validation. The behavior over the past few years has shown that automated lending based on smart contracts had genuine demand and true product-market fit long before institutions began to take notice.

The crypto market remains volatile. Building a lending system on top of the most dynamic existing assets forces on-chain lending to immediately address risk management, liquidation, and capital efficiency issues, rather than hiding them behind policies or human discretion. Without crypto-native collateral, it would be impossible to see just how powerful fully automated on-chain lending can be. The key is not cryptocurrency as an asset class, but the cost structure transformation brought by decentralized finance.

Why On-Chain Lending is Cheaper

On-chain lending is cheaper not because it's new technology, but because it eliminates layers of financial waste. Today, borrowers can access stablecoins on-chain at a cost of around 5%, while centralized crypto lending institutions charge interest rates of 7% to 12%, plus handling fees, service charges, and various additional costs. When conditions favor the borrower, choosing centralized lending is not only not conservative, it's irrational.

This cost advantage does not come from subsidies, but from capital aggregation in an open system. Permissionless markets are structurally superior to closed markets in pooling capital and pricing risk because transparency, composability, and automation drive competition. Capital moves faster, idle liquidity is penalized, and inefficiencies are exposed in real-time. Innovation spreads immediately.

When new financial primitives like Ethena's USDe or Pendle emerge, they absorb liquidity from the entire ecosystem and expand the use of existing financial primitives (like Aave) without the need for sales teams, reconciliation processes, or back-office departments. Code replaces management costs. This is not just an incremental improvement; it is a fundamentally different operational model. All advantages of the cost structure are passed on to capital allocators and, more importantly, to borrowers.

Every major transformation in modern history has followed the same pattern. Heavy-asset systems become light-asset systems. Fixed costs become variable costs. Labor becomes software. Centralized scale effects replace local duplication. Excess capacity is transformed into dynamic utilization. Change initially looks bad. It serves non-core users (e.g., lending for cryptocurrency, not mainstream use cases), competes on price before quality improves, and doesn't look serious until it scales to a point where existing players cannot cope.

On-chain lending fits this pattern exactly. Early users were mostly niche cryptocurrency holders. The user experience was poor. Wallets felt unfamiliar. Stablecoins didn't touch bank accounts. None of this mattered because the cost was lower, execution was faster, and access was global. As everything else improved, it became more accessible.

What Happens Next

During bear markets, demand falls, yields compress, revealing a more important dynamic. Capital in on-chain lending is always in competition. Liquidity does not stagnate due to quarterly committee decisions or balance sheet assumptions. It is constantly repriced in a transparent environment. Few financial systems are as relentless.

On-chain lending does not lack capital; it lacks collateral available for lending. Most on-chain lending today simply recycles the same collateral for the same strategies. This is not a structural limitation, but a temporary one.

Cryptocurrency will continue to generate native assets, productive primitives, and on-chain economic activity, thereby expanding the scope of lending. Ethereum is maturing into a programmable economic resource. Bitcoin is consolidating its role as a store of economic energy. Neither is a final state.

If on-chain lending is to reach billions of users, it must absorb real economic value, not just abstract financial concepts. The future lies in combining autonomous crypto-native assets with tokenized real-world rights and obligations, not to replicate traditional finance, but to operate it at an extremely low cost. This will be the catalyst for replacing the backend of old finance with decentralized finance.

What's Wrong with Lending

Lending is expensive today not because capital is scarce. Capital is abundant. The clearing rate for quality capital is 5% to 7%. The clearing rate for risk capital is 8% to 12%. Borrowers still pay high interest rates because everything surrounding capital is inefficient.

The loan origination process is bloated with customer acquisition costs and lagging credit models. Binary approvals cause quality borrowers to overpay, while subprime borrowers receive subsidies until they default. Servicing remains manual, compliance-heavy, and slow. Incentives are misaligned at every layer. Those who price risk rarely actually bear the risk. Brokers do not bear default risk. Loan originators immediately sell their exposure. Everyone gets paid regardless of the outcome. The flaw in the feedback mechanism is the true cost of lending.

Lending has not been disrupted because trust trumps user experience, regulation stifles innovation, and losses mask inefficiencies until they explode. When lending systems fail, the consequences are often catastrophic, reinforcing conservatism over progress. Consequently, lending still looks like an industrial-era product crudely grafted onto digital capital markets.

Breaking the Cost Structure

Unless loan origination, risk assessment, servicing, and capital allocation become fully software-native and on-chain, borrowers will continue to overpay, and lenders will continue to rationalize these costs. The solution is not more regulation or marginal user experience improvements. It is breaking the cost structure. Automation replaces processes. Transparency replaces discretion. Certainty replaces reconciliation. This is the disruption decentralized finance can bring to lending.

When on-chain lending becomes significantly cheaper to operate end-to-end than traditional lending, adoption is not a question, it is inevitable. Aave was born in this context, capable of serving as the foundational capital layer for a new financial backend, serving the entire lending landscape from fintech companies to institutional lenders to consumers.

Lending will become the most empowering financial product simply because the cost structure of decentralized finance will enable fast-moving capital to flow into the applications that need it most. Abundant capital will breed abundant opportunity.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7610583

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why is on-chain lending cheaper than traditional lending?

AOn-chain lending is cheaper because it eliminates layers of financial waste through open systems that aggregate capital, driven by transparency, composability, and automation, which fosters competition and reduces costs.

QWhat does the article identify as the main driver of the current $100B+ on-chain lending market?

AThe main driver is stablecoin borrowing, primarily collateralized by crypto-native assets like Ethereum, Bitcoin, and their derivatives.

QWhat does the article state is the current limitation for the growth of on-chain lending, rather than a lack of capital?

AThe limitation is not a lack of capital, but a lack of diverse collateral available for borrowing, as most lending currently recycles the same collateral for similar strategies.

QHow does the article describe the fundamental operational shift that DeFi brings to lending?

AIt describes a shift where automation replaces processes, transparency replaces discretion, and certainty replaces reconciliation, fundamentally breaking the old cost structures.

QWhat future development does the article suggest is necessary for on-chain lending to reach billions of users?

AIt must absorb real economic value by combining autonomous crypto-native assets with tokenized real-world rights and obligations, not to replicate traditional finance but to operate it at a radically lower cost.

Related Reads

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit4m ago

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit4m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit21m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit21m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy CORE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing CORE (CORE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy CORE (CORE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your CORE (CORE)After purchasing your CORE (CORE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade CORE (CORE)Easily trade CORE (CORE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy CORE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of CORE (CORE) are presented below.

活动图片