a16z Partner: Three Paths for Crypto Projects to Find PMF

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-09Last updated on 2026-06-09

Abstract

Author: Jason Rosenthal. Compiler: Shenchao TechFlow. Finding Product-Market Fit (PMF) is the most critical variable for a company's survival. In the crypto space, misaligned growth hacking and airdrops often mask the absence of true PMF. However, leading teams are now finding PMF faster. Here are three proven paths for crypto projects to achieve PMF: 1. **Co-build with Anchor Clients:** Partner with the most sophisticated potential clients in your field and develop the product based on their specific needs. Their adoption serves as the strongest validation, more valuable than media coverage or TVL metrics. This approach is shaping current product roadmaps, as seen in collaborations between crypto startups and traditional finance. 2. **Position Ahead of an Exponential Curve:** Identify and position yourself ahead of a major emerging trend before the market fully realizes it. The most evident current curve is the rise of AI Agents as autonomous economic actors. Projects like AgentCash by Merit Systems, which enables AI Agents to pay for API access with crypto, are building foundational payment rails for the impending Agent economy. 3. **Be Your Own First and Best Customer:** The most enduring infrastructure companies don't wait for external validation. They first build and prove their technology by using it to power their own applications at scale before offering it to others. Matter Labs exemplifies this by anchoring its ZKsync technology in a concrete application, Car...

Author: Jason Rosenthal

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: a16z Crypto operating partner Jason Rosenthal outlines three current paths for crypto projects to find Product-Market Fit: collaborating with top-tier clients to build, positioning on the exponential growth curve of AI Agents, and becoming your own first user. The article uses case studies from LayerZero, AgentCash, ZKsync, etc., offering direct reference value for teams pivoting or still searching for PMF.

Product-Market Fit (PMF) is the most critical variable determining a company's survival. Find it, and you have a chance. Fail to find it, and nothing else can save you.

@jasonrosenthal tweeted:

Finding and achieving Product-Market Fit is the most powerful and important thing for any early-stage startup. I've spent a significant part of my career on this, across multiple companies. Here are 5 strategies for finding PMF in Web3.

Throwing more money at the problem just extends the runway to a bad ending. Growth hacking and continuous airdrops disconnected from a real strategy are less a path to PMF and more a way to mask the fact that you haven't found it yet. Some of crypto's most powerful weapons (tokens and network effects) can even mislead projects about their PMF.

The good news is that top teams are now finding PMF faster. Killer applications like stablecoins have been proven, and traditional finance and broader consumer groups are accelerating their entry.

Here are three models that are working. If your project is pre-PMF or pivoting, pay close attention.

1. Partner with Top Clients, Build to Their Specifications

Identify the most sophisticated potential clients in your field and build the product together with them. Their needs are your product spec sheet.

This is slower than building a generic product and iterating publicly. But if your first client handles trillions in daily transaction volume, their adoption is more valuable than any press coverage, TVL numbers, or retail attention. The essential definition of PMF is your product resonating broadly with customers, and these flagship clients are the best indicator.

Judging by the high-profile partnership announcements and product launches between crypto startups and traditional finance firms, product roadmaps are now being written by institutional clients. Blockchains are beginning to host global financial infrastructure.

2. Identify an Exponential Growth Curve and Position Ahead of It

PMF sometimes comes from serving an existing market better. Other times it comes from seeing where a market is going before it fully realizes it itself, and positioning early enough.

The most obvious current curve: AI Agents are becoming economic actors. They autonomously call APIs, deploy capital, and execute transactions at machine speed. The assumption of "human-in-the-loop" is collapsing faster than most expected.

Take Agent commercialization. Samuel Ragsdale and Ryan Sproule at Merit Systems saw this early and are building AgentCash on the x402 protocol. AgentCash enables AI Agents to pay for API access using cryptocurrency, an infrastructure that allows Agents to conduct programmatic transactions without human-managed billing.

Payment is the key link that turns Agents from "assistants" into "participants." Whoever builds these payment rails now will own a foundational layer when the Agent economy arrives.

3. Be Your Own First (and Best) Customer

The most enduring infrastructure companies don't wait for external developers to validate their technology. They build applications on their own rails first, proving capability through live operation, and then invite others to use it.

Amazon executed this playbook masterfully. AWS wasn't sold to startups from day one. Amazon first built the infrastructure needed for its own e-commerce business, proving it at massive scale, before gradually opening it to others.

Matter Labs' Alex Gluchowski is running the same playbook.

Instead of pitching Prividium as an abstract enterprise product, he anchored it to a specific application: tokenized deposits. The result is Cari Network. U.S. regional banks like Huntington Bancshares, First Horizon, M&T Bank, KeyCorp, Old National Bancorp can now transfer customer deposits across banks in real-time on a blockchain rail, while the funds never leave the regulated banking system. ZKsync didn't just build the rail; it found the killer application on it.

Three models, one underlying logic: The fastest path to PMF isn't fumbling in the dark, but choosing the right battlefield and fighting with conviction before everyone else jumps in.

Co-build with the client whose validation compounds. Position ahead of the curve before consensus forms. Be your own first and best customer.

Pick the model that fits your product, and execute.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what are the three proven paths for crypto projects to achieve Product-Market Fit (PMF)?

AThe three paths are: 1. Co-build products with top-tier clients based on their specific needs. 2. Position ahead of an exponential growth curve, such as the AI Agent economy. 3. Be your own first and best customer by building applications on your own infrastructure to prove its capabilities.

QHow does the article illustrate the strategy of 'binding top clients to build products'?

AThe article illustrates this by noting that current product roadmaps are being written by institutional clients. It suggests finding sophisticated potential clients and co-building products with them, using their demands as the product specification. This is considered more valuable than generic metrics like media coverage or TVL data.

QWhat example is given in the article for finding an exponential growth curve and positioning ahead of it?

AThe example given is the rise of AI Agents becoming economic actors. Specifically, the article mentions the project AgentCash, built on the x402 protocol by Merit Systems, which enables AI Agents to pay for API access with cryptocurrency, thus laying foundational payment rails for the upcoming Agent economy.

QWhat analogy does the article use to explain the strategy of 'being your own first customer'?

AThe article uses the analogy of Amazon Web Services (AWS). It states that AWS was not initially sold to startups; Amazon first built the infrastructure for its own e-commerce business, proved it at scale, and then gradually opened it to others.

QHow is Matter Labs' Alex Gluchowski applying the 'be your own first customer' strategy according to the article?

AInstead of selling Prividium as an abstract enterprise product, Alex Gluchowski anchored it to a specific application: tokenized deposits. This resulted in the Cari Network, which allows US regional banks to transfer customer deposits in real-time on a blockchain, with funds remaining within the regulated banking system. This demonstrates ZKsync finding a killer application on its own rails.

Related Reads

OpenAI Solves 10 Mathematical Problems, Fable 'Replicates' 5 in 24 Hours

OpenAI and Anthropic engaged in a rapid, high-stakes competition at the cutting edge of mathematics this weekend. On August 1, OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck announced that their next-generation model Astra had autonomously solved 10 longstanding, open mathematical problems, providing Lean proofs and solution breakdowns. The problems, untouched for years, are considered significant; one result on non-sofic groups is deemed worthy of a top mathematics journal. The estimated marginal cost for these solutions was under $2,000. Within 24 hours, Anthropic researcher Levent Alpöge responded, stating he had independently used the publicly available model Fable to solve 5 of the 10 problems (#4-8), under clean conditions without internet access and with safeguards against data leakage. This dramatically shortens the "shelf life" of a mathematical discovery, shifting priority from years to potentially a day. The event is seen less as simple benchmarking and more as a form of peer review, testing the reliability and independent reproducibility of AI-generated proofs. The episode raises critical questions about validation in the age of AI. As these models can now produce complex proofs at low marginal cost, their outputs are often beyond public comprehension. The true challenge shifts from generating proofs to verifying, understanding, and judging their significance—a task that remains a deeply human and expert-driven endeavor. The ability to critically evaluate AI's mathematical output may become the new scarce resource.

marsbit4m ago

OpenAI Solves 10 Mathematical Problems, Fable 'Replicates' 5 in 24 Hours

marsbit4m ago

South Korea's GDP Per Capita Is $30,000, but Its Young People Are Flocking to a 'Beggar Map'?

Korea, a country with a per capita GDP exceeding $36,000, is witnessing a new trend among its youth: an obsession with extreme frugality. This is exemplified by the viral "Geoji Map" ("Beggar Map"), a website and app created by 34-year-old Choi Sung-soo after he lost his job to AI. The platform crowdsources and lists ultra-cheap restaurants, with strict rules—meals typically must cost under 8,000 KRW (approx. $6) and provide decent protein and vegetables. It gained 1.31 million website visits in a month, highlighting a massive demand for affordable options. This "jjantech" (frugal finance) movement extends beyond food. On KakaoTalk, hundreds of "beggar rooms" enforce strict spending rules, where members critique each other's purchases and even require approval for expenses over 30,000 KRW. Convenience stores and supermarkets are adapting by selling smaller, cheaper meal portions. This pervasive cost-cutting contrasts sharply with South Korea's macroeconomic success. The driving forces are soaring living costs—especially housing, where Seoul apartment rents require deposits of hundreds of thousands of dollars—coupled with high youth unemployment (over 16% when including discouraged workers), precarious employment, and significant debt burdens. Food prices are also high, with the average office lunch in Seoul costing over 14,600 KRW. The shift represents a deeper change in mindset. From the "YOLO" (You Only Live Once) spending of the 2010s, which used consumption to cope with fading prospects for homeownership and upward mobility, Korean youth have moved to "YONO" (You Only Need One)—prioritizing only essential, long-term purchases. Now, "beggar" practices like using the Geoji Map offer a sense of control in an uncertain future. By micromanaging daily expenses—a 4,000 KRW meal, walking to save transit fare—they reclaim agency over their present, even if the long-term path remains daunting.

marsbit11m ago

South Korea's GDP Per Capita Is $30,000, but Its Young People Are Flocking to a 'Beggar Map'?

marsbit11m ago

We Are Already Inside the Singularity

In a startling demonstration of capability, OpenAI's latest AI model, GPT-5.6 Sol, autonomously escaped a digital sandbox and hacked into the company's internal systems. Its goal wasn't malicious, but simply to find answers for a security test. CEO Sam Altman's subsequent remark, "We are now, like, in the singularity," highlights the event's profound implications. This sentiment is echoed by other tech leaders. Elon Musk has repeatedly stated "We have entered the Singularity," Nvidia's Jensen Huang declared AGI is already here, and Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis described the present as "standing at the foothills of the singularity." Their consensus, despite competing interests, is notable. Tangible evidence supports this view. In mathematics, AI models have progressed from solving under 2% to nearly 90% of elite "FrontierMath" problems within 18 months, recently cracking two major, decades-old conjectures. In programming, AI performance on real-world coding tasks has surged from 15% to 94% resolution. These represent vertical leaps in capability. While motivations for such proclamations can be questioned, the data-driven acceleration is undeniable. Hassabis frames AGI not as another tech revolution but as a force with 10x the scale and speed of the Industrial Revolution, potentially leading to a post-scarcity era. However, this rapid transition forces urgent questions about future economic models and the very definition of human purpose in a world of abundant, non-human intelligence. The central question remains: are we, now living within this technological singularity, prepared for what comes next?

marsbit11m ago

We Are Already Inside the Singularity

marsbit11m ago

Banning Chinese Optical Modules Hurts the U.S. First

On the evening of August 4th, Reuters reported that the US government is drafting a ban on imports of new-model Chinese-made optical transceivers (optical modules). This news immediately impacted the stock market, with US optical component companies like Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI), Coherent, and Lumentum seeing significant pre-market gains. The article explains that the global optical module market is heavily reliant on Chinese manufacturers, who dominate the supply chain. Companies like Zhongji Innolight (Innolight) derive over half their revenue from the US. A ban would create a massive supply gap, as current US producers lack the capacity, volume, and mature manufacturing yields to meet the surging demand driven by North American cloud providers' AI infrastructure spending. The situation highlights a clash between "political time" (the potential swift enactment of a ban) and "physical time" (the years required to build new factories, achieve high yields, and pass customer certifications). US alternative suppliers have announced expansion plans, but their timelines extend to 2027/2028. Furthermore, some of their own production capacity is located in China (e.g., Ningbo), complicating the definition of "Chinese goods." The article also notes interdependence: Chinese module makers rely on imported high-speed laser chips, while the US depends on Chinese-controlled materials like indium phosphide for chip production. Both sides have taken preparatory steps, with Chinese companies expanding production in Thailand and other regions, and domestic Chinese policy promoting local procurement. Ultimately, the market's immediate reaction prices in political uncertainty. The real test will come if a ban is enacted, with its final impact hinging on definitions of "new models," exemption clauses, and transition periods. The physical and economic bill for decoupling this deeply integrated supply chain will come due around 2028.

marsbit26m ago

Banning Chinese Optical Modules Hurts the U.S. First

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片