a16z: 7 Charts to Understand How Tokenization Is Changing the Nature of Assets

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-24Last updated on 2026-05-24

Abstract

a16z: 7 Charts on How Tokenization is Transforming the Nature of Assets Tokenized Assets, often referred to as "real-world assets" (RWA), are altering the form, flow, and structure of the financial system. The market recently surpassed $30 billion (excluding stablecoins), driven largely by tokenized U.S. Treasuries. These offer investors digital, yield-bearing assets with efficient settlement. Growth varies significantly by asset class. Asset-backed credit leads in speed, followed by niche financial assets, while venture capital and active strategies took longer to scale. U.S. Treasuries and commodities dominate, holding about two-thirds of the current market share. Within commodities, gold tokenization dominates entirely due to its standardization and historical appeal in crypto. The ecosystem is spread across multiple blockchains. Ethereum holds over half the market, with others like BNB Chain, Solana, and Stellar holding significant shares. However, a key insight is that most tokenized assets currently lack "composability." While the total market is large, only a small fraction (e.g., 5% of tokenized bonds) is used within DeFi protocols. Many tokens are simply digital records of off-chain assets, not natively programmable financial building blocks. In contrast, smaller categories like reinsurance tokens see very high on-chain usage. Looking ahead, forecasts for the tokenized asset market by 2030 range from $2 trillion to over $30 trillion, representing immense potenti...

This article is from:a16z crypto

Compiled by|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina); Translator|Moni

Tokenized Assets, often referred to as "Real World Assets (RWA)", are transforming the form of assets, how they flow, and how financial systems are constructed.

Just last month, the market size of tokenized assets surpassed $30 billion and is currently hovering around $34 billion (excluding stablecoins). This scale is roughly equivalent to a regional bank or a top-tier university endowment. While still minuscule compared to the global financial system, it is significant enough to have a tangible impact.

Two years ago, the tokenized asset market was worth less than $3 billion. Since then, the market has undergone dramatic changes: The US GENIUS Act has brought a clearer regulatory framework for stablecoins, institutional-grade on-chain infrastructure has matured, and a large number of financial institutions have nearly simultaneously begun deploying blockchain technology—it is precisely under the impetus of these factors that the tokenized asset market has grown tenfold in less than two years. (Note: While stablecoins are not included in the above statistics, they have substantially driven the growth of the entire market by greatly simplifying on-chain payments and settlements.)

This article will use 7 charts to analyze the reasons behind the rise of tokenized assets and their future trajectory.

Tokenized Assets Take Off: US Treasuries Become the Biggest Growth Engine

US Treasury bonds are the primary driver of the recent growth in the tokenized asset market.

The advantages of tokenized US Treasuries are clear and intuitive: investors can hold stable yield-generating assets in a digital form, enabling more efficient and flexible trading and transfer; financial institutions can achieve efficiency gains in settlement and collateral asset allocation, seamlessly connecting with digital financial markets.

Crypto investors can also use tokenized Treasuries to leverage idle stablecoins to gain returns from traditional money markets. Asset management institutions like BlackRock and Franklin Templeton have strategically positioned themselves accordingly, catalyzing a trillion-dollar market.

It is important to note that the growth rates of various tokenized assets vary widely, stemming from both the technical and regulatory difficulties of putting different assets on-chain and the market acceptance of products after launch.

  • Asset-backed credit assets have seen leading growth. Such tokenized assets mainly include tokenized home equity lines of credit, lending vault tokens, with reinsurance contracts, Bitcoin mining notes, and other niche financial assets following, reaching a market value of $1 billion within two years.
  • Venture capital assets took over seven years to exceed $10 billion in market value, with actively managed strategy assets following a similar cycle. These assets have complex structures, long investment horizons, and higher operational and regulatory barriers.
  • Treasuries and commodities have moved on-chain at a moderate pace, breaking the $10 billion market cap mark within 2 to 3 years and now representing mainstream categories.

At the beginning of 2024, Treasuries and commodities accounted for almost the entire tokenized asset market share. After 2024, the share of credit, niche finance, and equity categories steadily increased, but market concentration remains high. Currently, tokenized US Treasuries and commodities together account for about two-thirds of the market share.

Segmentation of the Tokenized Asset Market

The commodity tokenization sector is highly concentrated internally, with gold tokens dominating the vast majority, with a total scale of approximately $5.1 billion, of which gold tokens account for $5.0 billion. Silver and other category tokens total only $57.6 million, accounting for less than 0.01%.

Gold is naturally suited to the tokenized asset model. Currently, the commodity token market is essentially led by gold because: gold has a global unified standard, is convenient to store, is not easily damaged, and has long been traded via claim certificates.

Furthermore, crypto market investors have historically favored gold assets, with Bitcoin being called digital gold in its early days. Products like Tether's gold token XAUT and Paxos's gold token PAXG map ownership of vaulted gold onto the blockchain, transforming physical gold claims into digital tokens that can be held in on-chain wallets.

The market share for tokenized assets of crude oil, agricultural products, and emerging categories like energy and computing power is extremely low, with the industry still in its infancy.

Looking at the underlying public chain landscape, the tokenized asset ecosystem is more diversified. Ethereum, with its first-mover advantage in decentralized finance and institutional adoption foundation, still holds the leading position, hosting $15.7 billion in assets, accounting for over half of the market.

The remaining tokenized asset market is distributed across multiple public chains: BNB Chain's tokenized asset market size is about $4.0 billion, Solana about $2.2 billion, Stellar about $1.7 billion, Bitcoin sidechain Liquid Network about $1.5 billion. Tokenized asset sizes on XRP Ledger, ZKsync Era, and Arbitrum are all close to $1 billion.

The tokenized asset industry has not consolidated onto a single public chain. Assets are distributed across major blockchain ecosystems based on transaction costs, liquidity, compliance requirements, and business partnerships. However, the most telling data point is not the size of the tokenized asset market... but how these assets are being used.

Let's continue the analysis—

Most Tokenized Assets Are Not Yet "Composable"

Market size is not the only core metric; the actual application value of assets is more informative.

Bonds are the largest category of tokenized assets by market capitalization, at $15.2 billion, but only 5% of the circulating supply is used in DeFi protocols, amounting to only about $800 million. The utilization rate of precious metal tokenized assets is similarly low. Most tokenized assets are only used for on-chain storage and have not yet become freely composable, interconnected, and reusable financial building blocks.

Smaller tokenized asset categories show the opposite performance: reinsurance tokens with a market cap of $362 million have an on-chain protocol usage rate as high as 84%; private credit tokens have a 33% usage rate. These two asset classes were designed from the outset for on-chain composability. In contrast, top categories like Treasuries and gold are positioned primarily to simplify holding and transferring assets on-chain, without altering their original operational logic. This situation also highlights a core divergence in the tokenized asset industry: the varying degrees of on-chain native-ness among different tokenized assets.

Some assets can be freely transferred and applied across chains, while others merely use the blockchain as a ledger tool, limiting asset transfer and composability functions. Currently, most tokenized assets are essentially just digitized assets, merely moving accounting onto the chain, without unlocking their composability potential. And composability is the core value of on-chain finance and a key to upgrading the financial system.

The Pantera Capital Token Native Index shows that over 70% of tokenized assets have the lowest level of on-chain native-ness. A large number of tokens are merely digital certificates for offline physical assets, with actual asset control still relying on offline ledgers and intermediaries.

Currently, the tokenized asset industry is still in its early stages: one type is assets that are only digitally recorded on-chain, and another is assets that are natively on-chain and deeply integrated with blockchain characteristics.

The on-chain composability technology infrastructure is ready, and asset categories are gradually enriching, but deep integration and application have just begun.

Future Trends of Tokenized Assets

Industry predictions for the long-term scale of the tokenized asset market vary, but all generally agree the market will continue to expand.

  • McKinsey predicts the tokenized asset market will reach $2-4 trillion by 2030;
  • Ark Invest estimates the tokenized asset market at $11 trillion;
  • Boston Consulting Group and Ripple jointly calculate that the tokenized asset market will reach $9.4 trillion by 2030 and climb to $18.9 trillion by 2033;
  • Standard Chartered predicts the tokenized asset market will exceed $30 trillion by 2034.

Based on the above institutional estimates, compared to the current market size of $34 billion, the future growth space for the tokenized asset market industry could be a hundredfold. Of course, the numerical differences are not due to disagreements about the speed of industry adoption, but rather to different statistical definitions. The scope of statistics varies among institutions, covering differences in asset categories, whether stablecoins and deposits are included, and the defined scope of tokenization. For example: McKinsey's statistics focus on bonds, credit, funds, and stocks; Standard Chartered adds commodities and trade finance; BCG and Ripple additionally include deposits and stablecoins. However, despite the differences in statistical scope, the industry unanimously agrees that the scale of tokenized assets will undergo a leap forward expansion.

Looking at the global financial landscape, the current size of tokenized assets is still minuscule.

  • The global bond market is over $140 trillion, while tokenized bonds are only $15.2 billion, accounting for 0.01%;
  • The global physical gold market is worth tens of trillions of dollars, while tokenized gold is $5 billion, accounting for less than 0.02%;
  • The global stock market is over a hundred trillion dollars, while tokenized stocks are $1.5 billion, accounting for only 0.001%.

Today, emerging sectors have steadily taken shape. Assets with clear pricing, stable demand, and simple ownership, such as US Treasuries, gold, and private credit, have taken the lead in going on-chain. Currently, tokenization has not yet disrupted the underlying nature of assets, only optimizing the settlement and transfer methods. The deep integration of assets with the digital financial system is still being explored.

Currently, tokenized assets are more about digitization, and assets struggle to achieve programmable composable applications. The next phase of the industry faces a core challenge: bringing the more complex parts of the financial system on-chain and more deeply integrating tokenized assets into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure.

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary driver behind the recent explosive growth of the tokenized asset market?

AThe primary driver is U.S. Treasury bonds, which offer investors a stable, interest-bearing asset in a digital format with efficient settlement and transfer.

QAccording to the article, which specific type of tokenized asset currently dominates the commodities sector and why is it particularly well-suited for tokenization?

AGold dominates the tokenized commodities sector. It's well-suited because it has a globally unified standard, is easy to store, doesn't deteriorate, and has historically traded via ownership certificates, making its transition to a tokenized form natural.

QWhat key metric, beyond market size, does the article highlight as crucial for understanding the true value of tokenized assets?

AThe key metric is how the assets are *used*, specifically their utilization and composability within DeFi protocols, which reveals their actual integration and functional value beyond just being a digital record.

QWhat is the major limitation of most current tokenized assets like bonds and gold, as identified in the article?

AMost current tokenized assets lack 'composability.' They are often just digital records of off-chain assets, managed by traditional intermediaries, and are not deeply integrated or programmable within the DeFi ecosystem for combined, innovative uses.

QWhat is identified as the next critical challenge for the tokenized asset industry?

AThe next critical challenge is to bring more complex parts of the financial system on-chain and to integrate tokenized assets more deeply into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure, moving beyond simple digitization to true programmability.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit2h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit2h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit3h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit3h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit3h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit3h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit3h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片