A-Shares Frenzy Crashes Servers, Crypto Still Waiting for Twitter to Save the Day

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-12Last updated on 2026-01-12

Abstract

Chinese A股 markets are experiencing a historic rally, with the Shanghai Composite Index surpassing 4100 points—a 10-year high—and recording 16 consecutive positive trading days. This surge has led to overwhelming retail investor participation, even causing brokerage servers to crash due to high demand. Meanwhile, in contrast, the crypto community is discussing a potential new feature on X (formerly Twitter) called "Smart Cashtags," proposed by Nikita Bier, which would allow users to tag tokens or smart contracts in posts to display real-time prices and potentially enable trading. While some see this as a key step toward mass adoption, the author questions whether crypto truly lacks price discovery tools—given the abundance of existing platforms like CoinGecko and CMC—and argues that what crypto really lacks is not more entry points, but real profit opportunities. The article emphasizes that retail investors flock to markets with visible returns, as seen in A股, rather than to platforms based solely on convenience or features. The author concludes that adoption follows money and momentum, not the other way around, and remains skeptical about X’s ability to “save” crypto adoption through technical features alone.

Written by: Deep Tide TechFlow

The Shanghai Composite Index has broken through 4100 points.

This is a new high in 10 years. Starting from the end of December 2025, the market has seen 16-day winning streak, the last time such a trend appeared was in 2006. Retail investors flooded in, crashing brokerage servers with pop-up messages.

This is a screenshot of Guotai Haitong's "Fuyi" trading software shared in some crypto chat groups.

Regardless of whether the image is real or not, the FOMO sentiment towards A-shares during this period is certainly real.

If it is real, it's not actually new in the A-share market.

When the market heats up, the software crashes. In 2025, the trading volume reached 400 trillion yuan, and the total market capitalization broke through 100 trillion yuan, both hitting historical highs. Too much money, the servers can't handle it.

But you can complain all you want, money is still pouring in.

At the same time, what is Crypto Twitter discussing?

On January 11th, X's Product Lead (and Solana advisor) Nikita Bier posted about a planned feature called Smart Cashtags. Simply put, it allows users to tag specific tokens or smart contracts in their posts; others can click on the tag to see real-time prices, and potentially trade directly in the future.

Planned for launch in February.

KOLs got excited. Some analysts said this could make X the entry point for stock and crypto trading, others suggested collaborations with Solana memes, and some called it a key step towards mass adoption.

Bier himself said that X is the best source for financial information, and "hundreds of billions of dollars have already been deployed" based on information found on X.

Hundreds of billions of dollars.

But he didn't mention how much was lost, or how many people lost money.

Let me ask a question: Is what crypto lacks an "entry point to check prices"?

CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, DEXScreener, various Telegram bots, various exchange apps, various market aggregators... Open any of them, and you'll find prices, charts, market cap, holder distribution—everything you need.

How competitive is this sector?

Even wallets are adding market features, afraid you might click on another App while checking prices.

Now, they say that X building a "click-to-see-price" feature will save adoption?

Every bear market, someone says we need a better on-ramp.

In 2024, they said we needed ETFs. ETFs arrived, Bitcoin hit new highs, but altcoins still moved sideways, with on-chain capital lying flat.

In 2025, they said we needed more institutional entry. Institutions came, Strategy bought hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin, altcoins still showed no movement.

Now they say we need the traffic gateway of social platforms.

The question is, during the 2017 bull run, were there Smart Cashtags? During the 2021 wave, did X have trading features?

No. People came anyway.

Retail investors aren't staying away because there aren't enough entry points. It's because they got wiped out last cycle, or there's no赚钱效应 (money-making effect) this cycle.

Why did A-shares manage to crash servers?

A 16-day winning streak, 4100 points, the赚钱效应 (money-making effect) is visible to the naked eye. Retail investors vote with their feet; they don't need anyone to "save adoption".

Why is crypto waiting for X to save it? Because it can't attract people on its own.

This is a reversed cause and effect. It's not "with a better entry point, people will come", but "with a赚钱效应 (money-making effect), people will break down the doors to get in, even if the entry point is subpar".

Where the profit is, there the people are.

Not where the platform is, there the people are.

When Musk bought Twitter in 2022, he talked about making it an Everything App.

More than two years have passed, features have been teased one after another—from payments to trading to financial services—but few seem to have actually launched.

Smart Cashtags is said to launch in February.

How many new users it will bring, how much trading volume it will convert, we can wait and see.

But before that, I suggest first checking if X's own servers are stable. After all, when A-share software crashes, it's because too many people are rushing in.

When crypto exchanges crash, it's usually because people are running away too fast, rushing out.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for the surge in A-share market activity according to the article?

AThe main reason is the visible profit-making effect, with the Shanghai Composite Index reaching a 10-year high and achieving 16 consecutive positive trading days, which attracted a massive influx of retail investors.

QWhat is the 'Smart Cashtags' feature proposed by Nikita Bier on X (formerly Twitter)?

AThe 'Smart Cashtags' feature allows users to tag specific tokens or smart contracts in their posts, enabling others to click and see real-time prices, with potential future integration for direct trading.

QWhy does the article argue that crypto market doesn't need more price-checking entry points?

AThe article argues that the crypto market already has numerous tools like CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, DEXScreener, and various apps providing price data, making the space highly competitive and saturated with such features.

QWhat does the article suggest is the real driver for mass adoption in financial markets, based on the A-share example?

AThe article suggests that profit-making effect, not better entry points or platforms, is the real driver for mass adoption, as seen in the A-share market where investors flocked despite server crashes due to high returns.

QWhat historical examples does the article use to counter the idea that social platform features are necessary for crypto adoption?

AThe article cites the 2017 and 2021 crypto bull markets, which occurred without features like Smart Cashtags or X's trading functionalities, yet still attracted significant participation.

Related Reads

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手10m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手10m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit37m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit37m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit52m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy 4

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing 4 (4) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy 4 (4) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your 4 (4)After purchasing your 4 (4), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade 4 (4)Easily trade 4 (4) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.10.20Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy 4

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of 4 (4) are presented below.

活动图片