Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-07-02Last updated on 2026-07-02

Abstract

Solana has formally launched its on-chain governance system, empowering token holders and validators with a more open and decentralized way to influence major protocol decisions. Governance debates and voting are now conducted entirely on-chain using the new Solana Governance Proposals (SGP) framework, supported by stake-weighted voting and cryptographic verification. Validators with at least 100,000 SOL in delegated stake can submit an SGP. To proceed to a formal vote, a proposal must first gain support from at least 15% of the network's total staked SOL, ensuring only ideas with significant backing move forward. SGPs serve a distinct purpose from the technical Solana Improvement Documents (SIMDs). While SIMDs focus on *how* to implement protocol upgrades, SGPs determine *whether* the broader ecosystem believes a proposal should proceed, via an on-chain, stake-weighted vote. This separation allows core developers to continue building effectively while reserving community-wide votes for impactful decisions. A key feature grants delegators greater control: they can now override their validator's governance vote. If a validator votes against a delegator's preference or abstains, the delegator can cast a vote directly using their own stake weight through Solana's governance portal. The voting process is secured using Merkle proofs to verify participant stakes against an on-chain consensus snapshot. With this implementation, Solana aims to broaden community participation in g...

With the formal launch of its eagerly anticipated on-chain governance system, Solana now offers token holders and validators a more open and decentralised means of influencing important protocol decisions. Governance debates and voting are now fully conducted on-chain. It is supported by stake-weighted voting and cryptographic verification, with the recently implemented Solana Governance Proposals (SGPs).

Additionally, any validator having a delegated stake of at least 100,000 SOL is able to submit an SGP using the new structure. To ensure that only proposals with significant support forward, each proposal must first receive support from at least 15% of the network’s total staked SOL before going to a formal vote.

SGPs Split Community Choice From Technical Building

While Solana Improvement Documents (SIMDs) remain the standard process for technical protocol changes, SGPs serve a different purpose. SIMDs focus on answering how protocol upgrades should be implemented through technical review by core developers.

SGPs, on the other hand, decide whether the larger ecosystem thinks a proposal should proceed, and an on-chain, stake-weighted vote makes the ultimate decision. Additionally, it reserves community-wide voting for proposals that have a major influence on the ecosystem. This distinction enables developers to continue building effectively.

Delegators Gain Greater Control Over Governance

One of the most notable additions is the ability for delegators to override their validator’s governance vote. The validator votes against a delegator’s preference or chooses not to vote at all. And the delegator can cast a vote directly using their own stake weight through Solana’s governance portal.

Merkle proofs secure the voting process by verifying each participant’s stake against a consensus snapshot recorded on-chain. Also, this method relies on specialised governance algorithms that deliver verifiable weights for stakeholders before the actual voting takes place.

As Solana implements on-chain governance, it is able to include more members of the community in governance without compromising the development process.

Validators proposing the governance proposal, stakeholders voting with their stakes, and delegators enjoying full sovereignty. Solana is applying a particular governance model that combines decentralisation and efficiency of protocol development.

Crypto Market Highlights

Dogecoin (DOGE) Hangs Above Key Support: Can $0.068 Hold Against the Bears?

Senator Cynthia Lummis Defends Clarity Act Against Elizabeth Warren’s Criticism

Senator Cynthia Lummis defended the Clarity Act against Senator Elizabeth Warren's criticism that it contains loopholes for illicit cryptocurrency activities like money laundering. Warren cited concerns over an alleged $3.84 billion laundering case involving an Iranian company and a crypto exchange, arguing the bill weakens anti-money laundering rules and consumer protections. Lummis countered that the bill includes over sixteen provisions to combat illicit finance, such as applying Bank Secrecy Act rules to crypto (Section 201), sanctioning foreign jurisdictions like Iran (Section 303), and allowing temporary transaction freezes during investigations (Section 305). She called Warren's claims unfounded. The bill, which aims to clarify regulatory roles for the SEC and CFTC, faces ongoing debate in Congress with a 39% predicted chance of passage. Warren also urged stricter ethics rules following reports of a $1.4 billion crypto gain by former President Trump.

TheNewsCrypto16m ago

Senator Cynthia Lummis Defends Clarity Act Against Elizabeth Warren’s Criticism

TheNewsCrypto16m ago

Female Billionaire Becomes a VC

The article details how Zhou Qunfei, founder and chairwoman of Lens Technology and once China's "richest woman," has entered the venture capital (VC) space. Zhou's recent investment in the embodied AI unicorn Kuawei Intelligent, contributing several hundred million RMB from her personal funds, brought her VC activities into focus. Her investment vehicle, Changsha Qunxin Investment, has made 17 investments, targeting semiconductor and hard tech companies like ChipOne Technology. Meanwhile, Lens Technology, her listed company, has made strategic bets this year on AI startups such as BrainCo, Xinghai Tu, Qingtian Zu, and Pudu Robotics. Zhou's own story is one of remarkable ascent. Starting as a migrant factory worker in Shenzhen, she built Lens Technology into a powerhouse supplying glass for major tech clients like Apple, with a market cap surpassing 300 billion RMB. Her move mirrors a broader trend among China's self-made industrial tycoons. Figures like Liu Yi of iHealth Labs (an investor in DeepSeek) and Zhu Xingming of Inovance Technology are similarly redirecting family offices and corporate capital away from traditional sectors like real estate. Instead, they are placing strategic bets on frontier technologies—AI, embodied intelligence, brain-computer interfaces, and nuclear fusion—effectively funding China's next wave of technological innovation.

marsbit21m ago

marsbit21m ago

On the Eve of Its U.S. Journey, SK Hynix Plummets Sharply

Just before its highly anticipated U.S. listing, SK Hynix saw its share price plummet dramatically, losing over 14% in a single day. The sell-off was triggered by market fears of a potential slowdown in AI capital expenditure. This followed a news report suggesting Meta might sell "excess AI compute," which was later amended to remove the word "excess." The initial phrasing sparked a chain reaction in investor sentiment, linking it to a potential peak in AI demand. Despite the sharp downturn, the article argues this is likely an overreaction driven by market sentiment and structural de-leveraging, rather than a fundamental reversal of the AI trend. The author points out that even if Meta proceeds, it could be an optimization of existing assets, not a systemic demand contraction. SK Hynix is in the final stages of its U.S. IPO via an ADR listing on Nasdaq, aiming to raise approximately $29.4 billion—one of the largest such offerings ever. The funds are earmarked for expanding domestic Korean production capacity for HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) and advanced packaging. A key motivation for the U.S. listing is to achieve a valuation re-rating, escaping the so-called "Korea discount" and tapping into the higher valuation multiples typically given to AI-related semiconductor stocks in the U.S. market. In conclusion, the article views the current price drop as a potential buying opportunity, suggesting the long-term industry fundamentals for SK Hynix—particularly its leading position in the crucial HBM market—remain strong. The significant capital raised from the IPO is also seen as a factor that could provide underlying support for the stock post-listing.

Odaily星球日报22m ago

On the Eve of Its U.S. Journey, SK Hynix Plummets Sharply

Odaily星球日报22m ago

arXiv Breaks Away from Cornell, Officially Takes Flight on Its Own

arXiv, the widely used preprint server, has officially spun off from Cornell University as of July 1, becoming an independent nonprofit organization named arXiv, Inc. Registered in Delaware with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, this move ends its 25-year affiliation with Cornell. The new entity will be governed by a board of up to 12 members, with the Simons Foundation and Cornell University serving as founding members for the first five years. Ramin Zabih, a Cornell professor, will serve as interim CEO during the transition. All 26 staff members have transferred to the new organization, and operations—including free access to papers—are expected to remain unchanged for users in the near term. Founded in 1991 by physicist Paul Ginsparg, arXiv hosts over 3.09 million preprints across physics, mathematics, computer science, and other fields, facilitating rapid dissemination of research. Key motivations for independence include financial pressures—arXiv faced a deficit in 2025—and the need for greater operational flexibility to address challenges like the surge in AI-generated submissions. The platform remains committed to its free-access model but will explore broader funding avenues as a standalone entity.

marsbit27m ago

arXiv Breaks Away from Cornell, Officially Takes Flight on Its Own

marsbit27m ago

World Cup Upsets Keep Coming, the 'Dumb Money' in Prediction Markets Got Me Laughing

The 2026 FIFA World Cup has been marked by frequent upsets, turning prediction markets into a high-stakes game of chance. Odaily Planet Daily examines several high-profile cases where "smart money" bets went disastrously wrong, questioning if these losses offer any contrarian insights. A major upset occurred when underdog Cape Verde held football powerhouse Spain to a 0-0 draw. A trader, betting $1 million on a Spanish victory at 0.92 odds to earn $85,000, instead lost their entire principal. This match set a precedent for underdogs stifling favorites. Similarly, Portugal, despite featuring star Cristiano Ronaldo, was held to a 1-1 draw by debutants DR Congo. A trader with a 49% win rate lost over $243,000 predicting a Portuguese win. The article highlights the case of a notorious "anti-indicator" address, @Zzzz87. After initially losing over $620,000 (with a sub-40% win rate) by betting on underdog upsets, the address switched strategy. It began backing favorites in the knockout stages, reportedly turning a $269,000 profit in a week, despite being down $255,000 over the past month. This exemplifies the market's volatility and the difficulty of establishing a consistent strategy. The core conclusion is that football's inherent unpredictability defies simple logic based on player valuations or national rankings. Whether following "smart money" or betting against "dumb money," the only certainty is uncertainty. The article advises enthusiasts to enjoy the games while remaining adaptable in their approach to the prediction markets.

Odaily星球日报29m ago

World Cup Upsets Keep Coming, the 'Dumb Money' in Prediction Markets Got Me Laughing