UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

UBS: A-share tech stocks still far from peak crowding levels A-shares' technology sector has seen a strong rebound, with trading activity hitting record highs, raising concerns about market crowding. However, UBS Securities argues that a key indicator of institutional positioning suggests the current crowding level remains well below historical peaks. While the large-cap tech sector's share of total A-share trading volume and market capitalization have reached historical highs, the overweight ratio of domestic mutual funds in this sector stood at 9.9% in Q1 2026. This is down from 11.6% in Q3 2025 and significantly lower than the historical peak of 14.1% in Q4 2015. It also pales in comparison to the historical peak overweight of 18.7% for the consumer sector. UBS notes that typical cycles from a low to a peak in fund overweighting last about three years, and the current outperformance of the tech/growth style has lasted less than two years since the policy pivot in September 2024. UBS expects A-share earnings recovery to accelerate, providing fundamental support. It forecasts 2026 A-share profit growth to rise to 11% from 3.9% in 2025. Non-financial A-share profits grew 11.8% YoY in Q1 2026, with gross and net profit margins at their highest since 2023. Persistent fund inflows, the expansion of thematic ETFs, and a recovery in private fund issuance are supporting market liquidity. In tactical allocation, UBS favors growth and cyclical styles under its "slow bull" base ca...

Author: Xu Chao

Source: Wall Street News

A-share tech stocks have staged a strong rebound, with trading activity repeatedly hitting new highs, raising market concerns about crowding. However, the latest research report from UBS Securities offers a more reassuring judgment: although the trading volume and market cap proportion of the large tech sector have both surpassed historical highs, key indicators measuring the concentration of institutional holdings show that the current crowdedness is still significantly below historical peaks, and the duration of this tech growth style has not yet reached two years.

According to the latest UBS Securities report, as of the first quarter of 2026, the overweight ratio of public funds in the large tech sector (including electronics, communications, computers, and defense) was 9.9%, lower than the 11.6% in the third quarter of 2025 and significantly lower than the historical peak of 14.1% in the fourth quarter of 2015; it also lags far behind the historical maximum overweight ratio of 18.7% for the consumer sector.

UBS points out that it typically takes about three years for the public fund overweight ratio to cycle from a trough to a peak. Since the policy pivot in September 2024, the outperformance of this tech growth style has lasted less than two years so far.

Meanwhile, the A-share earnings recovery is accelerating, providing more solid fundamental support for the market rally.

UBS expects the profit growth rate for all A-shares to rise from 3.9% in 2025 to 11% in 2026. In the first quarter of 2026, non-financial sector profits increased by 11.8% year-on-year, with both gross margin and net profit margin hitting their highest levels since 2023. Continued inflows from multiple funding channels, sustained expansion of industry-theme ETF sizes, and the recovery of private fund issuance collectively form important support for the current market micro-liquidity.

In tactical allocation, UBS leans towards growth and cyclical styles under its baseline "slow bull" scenario. At the sector level, it strongly favors electronics, communications, electrical equipment, machinery, non-ferrous metals, and chemicals, and maintains buy ratings on multiple related stocks.

Tech Overweight Ratio Still Has Room, Current Style Duration Still Short

The trading heat and capital concentration in the tech sector have warmed up significantly recently.

According to UBS data, as of June 2, 2026, the weekly trading volume of the large tech sector accounted for 45.5% of total A-share trading volume, and its market cap accounted for 28.6% of the total market. Both metrics are at historical highs. Since the Iran-US ceasefire on April 8, which repaired risk appetite, the STAR 50 and ChiNext indices have surged 35.5% and 30.4% cumulatively, significantly outperforming the 11.0% gain of the Wind All-A Index and the 9.8% gain of the CSI 300 Index over the same period.

However, UBS believes that using trading heat and short-term gains to judge crowdedness has limitations, and the public fund overweight ratio is a more core indicator for measuring institutional positioning concentration. From this perspective, the current overweight ratio of the large tech sector is not only lower than its own historical peak but also far behind levels seen at historical peaks for the consumer sector, such as 22.8% in the third quarter of 2010 and 21.0% in the third quarter of 2012.

UBS reviewed the historical patterns of five major style rotations in A-shares since 2014:

  • From 2014 to 2015, leveraged funds drove sharp market fluctuations.
  • From 2017 to 2019, foreign inflows fueled the "blue-chip stock" rally.
  • From 2019 to 2021, public funds chased profit-compounding companies, forming a positive feedback loop.
  • From 2022 to before the policy pivot in 2024, insurance capital and the "national team" drove defensive sectors to outperform.
  • After the policy pivot in 2024, margin financing, ETFs, and private funds have propelled the outperformance of small-cap and growth styles.

The study found that each style typically lasts about three years from formation to rotation — the high fundamental growth of a single sector rarely lasts more than three years, and there is a natural ceiling to fund concentration. Pressure from redemptions after narrowing outperformance transmits to stock prices and triggers a trend reversal.

However, signals from some sub-sectors are already worth noting. The overweight ratio for the electronics sector has reached 6.6%, exceeding the previous high of 5.4% in the third quarter of 2020. The overweight ratio for the communications sector has refreshed its record high since 2010 for three consecutive quarters, reaching 4.0%. UBS stated it will continue to monitor changes in related indicators.

Earnings Recovery Accelerates, Solidifying Market Rally Foundation

UBS expects the profit growth rate for all A-shares to rise to 11% in 2026 and points out that multiple top-down and bottom-up indicators confirm the acceleration of the earnings improvement trend.

Based on Q1 2026 earnings data, the year-on-year profit growth rate for non-financial A-shares surged from 0.8% in 2025 to 11.8%; excluding oil, petrochemicals, and basic chemicals, the growth rate reached 12.3%. The profit growth rate for the STAR Market in Q1 was as high as 204.7%, and the ChiNext Market reached 22.7%, both significantly outperforming the main board's 5.5%. Gross margin and net profit margin increased by 0.6 and 0.3 percentage points year-on-year, respectively, both hitting their highest levels since 2023, indicating that margin pressure for downstream companies remains manageable despite high oil prices.

On the macro level, April PPI rose 2.8% year-on-year, and CPI rose 1.2%. UBS expects inflation to rise further in the coming months. Since non-financial A-share revenue growth is highly correlated with nominal GDP and PPI trends, rising inflation will directly drive faster expansion on the revenue side.

Bottom-up data also confirms the upward profit trend.

In the first four months of this year, profits for industrial enterprises above designated size grew 18.2% year-on-year, with profits in computer, communication, and electronic equipment manufacturing soaring 107.7% year-on-year; profits in non-ferrous metal mining, mining, and coal washing sectors grew 94.9%, 26.0%, and 21.0% year-on-year, respectively. Regarding profit expectations, earnings growth expectations for the IT, raw materials, real estate, and energy sectors over the past six months have all been revised upward by more than 20 percentage points. The trajectory of these upward revisions is highly similar to past earnings upcycle years like 2017, 2019, and 2021.

From a medium-term perspective, an increasing share of overseas business is another important support for margin expansion. The proportion of overseas revenue for non-financial A-shares has steadily increased from 9.5% in 2010 to 18.7% in 2025. Furthermore, the gross margin of overseas business has consistently been higher than that of domestic business, with the gap widening further in 2025. UBS believes that the continued advancement of "anti-involution" policies and the implementation of supportive policies will also drive further sector margin recovery over the medium term.

Tactical Allocation: Emphasis on Growth and Cyclicals, Six Sectors Overweighted

At the style allocation level, under its baseline "slow bull" scenario, UBS favors growth styles. The backdrop of rising PPI and industrial profits supports cyclical styles. Sustained ample liquidity and high market turnover favor small-cap styles.

However, the continued expansion of industry-theme ETF sizes is providing additional capital support to leading companies. UBS expects the relative performance of large-cap versus small-cap styles to be more balanced in the second half of the year compared to 2025.

At the sector level, UBS is overweight six areas: Electronics (benefiting from semiconductor inventory cycle recovery and AI innovation), Communications (driven by AI computing demand and widespread adoption of industrial internet, fueling profit growth for sub-sector leaders), Machinery (automation equipment and industrial robotics benefiting from domestic capital expenditure recovery and import substitution), Non-ferrous Metals (rising copper and aluminum prices, lithium sector demand recovery), Chemicals (advancement of anti-involution and accelerated exit of overseas capacity accelerating bottom formation), and Electrical Equipment (policy support and AI data center power demand driving energy storage development).

Related Questions

QAccording to UBS, is the crowding in A-share technology stocks at a historically high level currently?

ANo. While trading volume and market cap share of the large tech sector are at historical highs, the core indicator measuring institutional position concentration, the public fund overweight ratio, is still far below historical peaks. The current overweight ratio for the large tech sector is 9.9%, significantly lower than its historical peak of 14.1% in Q4 2015 and much lower than the consumer sector's historical peak overweight of 18.7%.

QWhat is the expected profit growth rate for all A-shares in 2026 according to UBS's report?

AUBS expects the profit growth rate for all A-shares to increase to 11% in 2026, up from 3.9% in 2025.

QWhat are the two tech sub-sectors where the overweight ratios have already reached concerning levels as per UBS's analysis?

AThe two sub-sectors are Electronics and Communications. The Electronics sector's overweight ratio has reached 6.6%, surpassing its previous high of 5.4% in Q3 2020. The Communications sector's overweight ratio has hit 4.0%, a new high for three consecutive quarters since 2010.

QWhat are the six sectors that UBS recommends overweighting in its tactical asset allocation under the 'slow bull' baseline scenario?

AThe six sectors are: Electronics, Communications, Electrical Equipment, Machinery, Non-ferrous Metals, and Chemicals.

QBased on historical patterns studied by UBS, how long does a typical market style cycle from formation to rotation usually last in the A-share market?

AUBS's research on style shifts since 2014 indicates that a typical market style cycle, from formation to rotation, usually lasts about three years.

Related Reads

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

This article analyzes recent news about China's domestic DUV lithography machines, advising a measured perspective. A state-backed enterprise plans to deliver about 5 immersion DUV systems this year, with a 2027 target of 20 units, aimed at 28nm processes. While this marks a step from R&D into initial customer validation, the author cautions against over-optimism. The piece clarifies this is DUV, not EUV technology. DUV is crucial but cannot economically solve challenges for advanced nodes like 5nm or below, where EUV is key. The 5-unit volume is minimal compared to ASML's annual output of over 130 such machines. The author highlights unverified claims regarding specs like 90% yield and warns against conflating this news with unconfirmed reports about Shanghai Micro Electronics' production. China's EUV efforts, while progressing with a prototype, remain in early testing, facing significant hurdles in core components like high-precision optics. The analogy of a "DeepSeek moment" is deemed misleading, as lithography involves slow, iterative precision engineering, not rapid software-like breakthroughs. Current progress represents establishing a potential second supply source and gaining vital engineering experience rather than an imminent industry disruption. For investors, the key indicators to watch are formal customer acceptance, stable operational performance, repeat orders, and growth in production volume and component localization. The conclusion is that this is a positive but early-stage development, far from altering the global competitive landscape.

marsbit45m ago

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

marsbit45m ago

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit1h ago

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit1h ago

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbit1h ago

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片