Bithumb Reveals Timeline for Exchange Listing

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-03Last updated on 2026-08-03

Abstract

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb has unveiled its roadmap for an initial public offering (IPO), aiming to complete the listing by 2028. The plan includes strengthening internal controls in 2026 and transitioning its accounting to Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS). In 2027, Bithumb intends to apply for a preliminary listing review with local authorities. The company noted that the timeline could shift due to market conditions and regulatory processes. The IPO has been under discussion for years, with initial plans targeting a 2025 listing on KOSDAQ. However, the timeline has been postponed several times. Bithumb is currently restructuring its business to separate responsibilities, streamline operations, and diversify its revenue model away from trading fees. The exchange's internal controls came under scrutiny in early 2026 following a major operational error. During a promotional campaign, an employee mistakenly credited users with approximately 620,000 BTC instead of Korean won, far exceeding the exchange's actual reserves of about 46,000 BTC. This caused Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet by 15%. Bithumb recovered about 99.7% of the erroneously distributed assets but was unable to retrieve roughly 125 BTC.

South Korean crypto exchange Bithumb has presented a roadmap for preparing its IPO with the aim of completing the listing in 2028. This is reported by The Block.

According to the company's statement, in 2026, Bithumb intends to strengthen internal controls and prepare for the transition from Korean Generally Accepted Accounting Principles K-GAAP to Korean International Financial Reporting Standards K-IFRS.

In 2027, the exchange plans to apply for preliminary listing review and pass inspection by local authorities. The completion of the IPO is scheduled for 2028, but the timeline may change due to market conditions and the timing of regulatory review.

Bithumb stated that it is building a risk management system at the level required for public companies. It is assisted in this by one of South Korea's leading auditing firms.

The company has also restructured its business to divide responsibilities among divisions, simplify the structure, and reduce the risk of conflicts of interest. In addition, the platform intends to diversify its business model, reduce reliance on trading fees, and increase liquid assets to maintain financial stability.

Timelines Have Shifted

The Bithumb IPO has been discussed for several years. In 2023, the company selected Samsung Securities as the main underwriter and considered listing on KOSDAQ in the second half of 2025.

However, the deadlines have been postponed several times. In March 2026, Maeil Business Newspaper wrote that the actual listing would likely take place after 2028, and that Bithumb would focus on preparing for the listing until the end of 2027. The company also entered into a consulting agreement with Samjong KPMG.

An Error Involving 620,000 $BTC

At the beginning of 2026, Bithumb's internal controls drew the attention of South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) after users were mistakenly credited with about 620,000 $BTC during a promotional campaign.

The glitch occurred on February 6. An employee of the platform confused the tickers and entered bitcoin as the reward unit instead of Korean won. The amount of funds credited far exceeded the exchange's actual reserves. At the time of the incident, Bithumb held only about 46,000 $BTC in its wallets.

Following the incident, the price of bitcoin against the won on the platform plummeted by 15%. Representatives of the exchange reported the recovery of 99.7% of the erroneously distributed assets. It was not possible to recover approximately 125 $BTC.

Recall that in June, South Korea's Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) ordered Bithumb to pay 210 million won (~$136,000 at the exchange rate at that time) for transferring user data to foreign companies without their consent.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat is Bithumb's target year for completing its IPO according to its roadmap?

ABithumb's target year for completing its IPO is 2028.

QWhat major internal switch does Bithumb plan to prepare for in 2026?

AIn 2026, Bithumb plans to prepare for the transition from the Korean Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (K-GAAP) to the Korean International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS).

QWhat incident in early 2026 drew the attention of South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) to Bithumb?

AIn early 2026, a major internal control incident drew the FSS's attention, where approximately 620,000 BTC were mistakenly credited to users during a promotional campaign due to an employee confusing tickers.

QWhy were the IPO timelines for Bithumb pushed back from the initial 2025 target?

AThe IPO timelines were pushed back from the initial 2025 target primarily due to the need for more extensive preparation, internal restructuring, and changes in regulatory review timelines.

QWhat was the financial consequence for Bithumb related to a user data privacy violation in June?

AIn June, the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) ordered Bithumb to pay a fine of 210 million won (approximately $136,000 at the time) for transferring user data to overseas companies without consent.

Related Reads

Dan Koe: The Counterintuitive Truth—You Don't Need to Remember Everything You Read

Dan Koe: The Counterintuitive Truth — You Don't Need to Remember Everything You Read The central idea is that deliberately trying to remember information is often misguided. True learning isn't about memorizing facts but about having important knowledge surface naturally when needed through use. Most forgetting is normal, not a failure. The article reframes learning using a control theory framework—a four-step feedback loop: having a clear Goal, accurately Sensing your current state, Comparing the gap, and Acting to close it. Most learning stalls because people only do step 2 (blind input) without a goal to create the necessary "error signal" for focused action. The most effective method is to start with output, not input. Begin a meaningful personal project first, and learn only what's necessary to complete it. This project-driven, "just-in-time" learning ensures knowledge is contextual and retained. The concept of a "Second Brain" often fails because it becomes a digital graveyard—over-collected and under-utilized. The goal should be building a "Second Subconscious"—a dynamic system that proactively surfaces relevant ideas during creation, not a static storage vault. Tools like Obsidian+Claude or Eden can help by automating organization and enabling semantic search, but their value depends on linking knowledge to active projects. Ultimately, what matters is not what you store, but what you filter and internalize. Focus on ideas that shape your worldview, use projects as filters, and transform collected material through writing and sharing. AI should be used to reduce friction in research and editing, not to formulate your core views. In conclusion, remembering is a byproduct, not the goal. Knowledge that sticks comes from pursuing personal goals, applying it in real projects, and digesting it through creation. The tools are merely aids; the crucial step is to start doing meaningful work and let the necessary knowledge find you.

marsbit47m ago

Dan Koe: The Counterintuitive Truth—You Don't Need to Remember Everything You Read

marsbit47m ago

A New Era: The Fundamental Transformation of China's Entrepreneurs

A profound generational shift is underway among Chinese entrepreneurs. The wealth and influence once dominated by real estate and internet giants is now being claimed by a new wave of founders driving breakthroughs in AI, semiconductors, and robotics. This change is vividly reflected in 2026's wealth rankings. Figures like Zhang Yiming (ByteDance), Liang Wenfeng (DeepSeek), Chen Tianshi (Cambricon), and Wang Xingxing (Unitree Robotics) are ascending. Their wealth stems not from traditional business models but from market expectations for future technological competitiveness, with AI, chips, and smart hardware becoming the primary engines of wealth creation. Their common trait is a foundational focus on technology, often starting from the laboratory rather than a business plan. Examples include Chen Tianshi's decade-long push in AI chips, Liang Wenfeng's core algorithmic innovations at DeepSeek with a compact team, and Zhu Yiming's "no salary until profitable" 9-year journey to build Changxin Memory into a global DRAM player. This transition marks a fundamental shift in China's economic imperative: from commercial expansion and learning to indigenous innovation and deep industrial capability. While the previous generation built the foundational market and infrastructure, this new cohort is tasked with achieving global leadership in core technologies, moving China from "keeping pace" to pioneering original, breakthrough innovations that are industrialized at scale. The baton is being passed to those competing on the world stage through technological originality.

marsbit47m ago

A New Era: The Fundamental Transformation of China's Entrepreneurs

marsbit47m ago

Once-Popular Web3 Enters Wave of Layoffs

The once-hot Web3 industry is experiencing a severe wave of layoffs. While many companies attribute job cuts to AI-driven restructuring, the primary reason is often financial pressure. The Web3 sector, at the intersection of tech and finance, has been hit particularly hard. Employees at major cryptocurrency exchanges report sudden, impersonal layoffs—often with system access revoked overnight—and minimal or no severance. Common tactics include setting impossible performance targets or terminating employees for minor policy violations. The working atmosphere has become toxic, marked by intense monitoring, excessive meetings, and management obsessed with control and internal politics rather than product innovation. The industry's core business model is collapsing. Exchange revenue from trading fees and listing charges has plummeted due to a decline in quality projects and retail investor exodus. Events like the massive forced liquidation on October 10th further shattered confidence. Competition from on-chain derivatives platforms and prediction markets is intensifying the downturn. As layoffs continue, displaced workers struggle to find new opportunities. Many transition to the AI sector, but face significant bias from traditional finance and even some AI firms, which view crypto industry experience with suspicion. The current downturn appears more structural than cyclical, driven by unsustainable practices, internal strife, and a failure to innovate, raising questions about the industry's future trajectory.

marsbit1h ago

Once-Popular Web3 Enters Wave of Layoffs

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片