Trader Misses Out on Over $2 Million Potential Profit After Selling Memecoin PONS

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-26Last updated on 2026-08-26

Abstract

A trader missed out on over $2 million in potential profit after selling the memecoin $PONS. According to Lookonchain analysts, the user spent 0.25 ETH (around $610) to buy 19.98 million $PONS, later selling the entire amount for 0.47 ETH ($1,166), securing a profit of $556. Subsequently, the value of those tokens surged to approximately $2.2 million, meaning the trader potentially forfeited more than $2 million. However, users pointed out that the paper value does not guarantee the ability to sell the entire volume at the market price. One user noted that at the time of sale, $PONS had already increased by 91%, making the decision to take profits reasonable, as most would have done the same. Another user highlighted the asset's low liquidity, with only about $2.1 million in the liquidity pool, suggesting that a bulk sale would have significantly impacted the price and likely yielded only a six-figure sum at best. Thus, the actual realizable profit would have been much lower than the nominal $2.2 million valuation.

Analysts at Lookonchain highlighted a trader who missed out on over $2 million in potential profit on the $PONS token.

According to their data, the user spent 0.25 $ETH, or about $610, to purchase 19.98 million $PONS. Later, they sold the entire amount for 0.47 $ETH, receiving $1,166 and securing a profit of $556.

After that, the value of the 19.98 million $PONS increased to approximately $2.2 million. Thus, the trader potentially missed out on over $2 million in profit.

However, users noted that the potential token value does not necessarily mean the entire volume could be sold at the current market price.

An X user under the pseudonym Bub pointed out that $PONS had already increased by 91% at the time of sale, so the decision to lock in profits was quite understandable:

"Most people in his position would have done the same. Slow and steady is also a strategy, and almost no one is capable of holding an asset for that long."

Another user, AutoDiddakt, highlighted the asset's low liquidity. According to him, there was only about $2.1 million in the liquidity pool.

"If he had dumped everything at once, he would have been lucky to get even a six-figure sum," he stated.

Thus, despite the nominal asset valuation of $2.2 million, the actual profit from selling the entire volume could have been significantly lower due to the impact of a large transaction on the token's price.

Recall that Incrypted has a Telegram channel dedicated to memecoins. To stay updated on the latest developments in this sphere, subscribe to MEMEcrypted.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, how much potential profit did a trader miss after selling the meme coin $PONS?

AThe trader missed over $2 million in potential profit after selling their $PONS tokens.

QWhat was the trader's initial investment in $PONS and what profit did they actually secure from the sale?

AThe trader initially invested 0.25 $ETH (approximately $610) and later sold the tokens for 0.47 $ETH ($1166), securing a profit of $556.

QWhat reason did the user 'Bub' on X give to justify the trader's decision to sell the $PONS tokens?

ABub stated that by the time of the sale, $PONS had already increased by 91%, making the decision to secure profits understandable, and that most people in that position would have done the same.

QWhat key limitation did user AutoDiddakt point out regarding the trader's potential to realize the full $2.2 million valuation?

AAutoDiddakt pointed out the low liquidity of the asset, noting that the liquidity pool contained only about $2.1 million, meaning a large sell-off would have drastically reduced the price and the actual profit realized.

QWhat is the name of the Telegram channel mentioned in the article for staying updated on memecoins?

AThe Telegram channel mentioned is called MEMEcrypted.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Is Ready for "Parabolic Growth". Is Altseason Upon Us?

Amid a general market uptrend, experts are discussing the potential start of an 'altcoin season', where major cryptocurrencies could outpace Bitcoin's growth. This follows Bitcoin surpassing $81,000, predictions of a new bull market, and a capital shift from AI stocks toward Bitcoin and gold. Since August 17th, the crypto market has risen over 22%, primarily driven by Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), which gained 25% and 30% respectively, reaching highs last seen in May. Analysts suggest the Bitcoin bear cycle has ended, anticipating a historically strong rally, with renewed institutional demand for cryptocurrency ETFs. BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes, in a recent interview, declared the start of a new bull market, predicting Bitcoin could quickly reach "hundreds of thousands" of dollars. Market observers interpret this as an expectation for 'parabolic growth.' Signs of a bull market revival include Bitcoin ETFs re-entering the top 10 most-traded ETFs, displacing some AI-focused funds. Analysts at CryptoQuant note capital is flowing from Bitcoin into riskier altcoins, with their bull market indicators showing the most optimistic signals since October 2025. However, the reality is more nuanced. The current surge is a rebound from yearly lows; Bitcoin's price is still down nearly 40% from its October peak. The Altcoin Season Index has dropped to 39 from 67 in early August, and Bitcoin's dominance remains around 60%, indicating investor focus is still on Bitcoin rather than altcoins. Experts predict the market is entering a phase where project fundamentals and real revenue, rather than speculation, will increasingly determine asset value.

cryptonews.ru58m ago

Bitcoin Is Ready for "Parabolic Growth". Is Altseason Upon Us?

cryptonews.ru58m ago

$120 Million Vanishes Overnight! Crypto's 'Steadiest Giant' Stumbles in South America

Summary: Tether's $120 million Bitcoin mining venture in Uruguay, initiated in May 2023, was abruptly shut down in July 2025 when the national power utility UTE cut off electricity. The project, developed in partnership with local firm Microfin in Florida province, was touted as a model for leveraging the country's nearly 98% renewable energy grid. The collapse stemmed from a fundamental contract dispute over electricity supply. Tether interpreted the agreed power volume as a "minimum guaranteed supply," expecting to request more as the mining operation expanded. UTE, however, viewed it as a "strict maximum cap." This disagreement led to frequent power curtailments for the 24/7 mining facility, causing significant revenue loss from lost computing power. Following the 2025 election of left-wing President Yamandú Orsi and a management change at UTE, negotiations broke down. Microfin stopped paying electricity bills in May 2025, formally notified UTE of contract termination in June, and did not attend a final meeting where UTE presented a revised contract. By the July 25 power cut, Microfin's debt approached $5 million. The operation ceased, laying off 30 of its 38 local staff, with all outstanding debts settled by December 2025. The failure highlights key risks for heavy-asset overseas investments: Uruguay's green energy proved not to be cheap energy, especially after the 2024 Bitcoin halving squeezed industry profits. Furthermore, political changes can swiftly alter utility company policies, undermining the long-term regulatory stability critical for such projects. While financially absorbable for Tether, the incident underscores that operational success depends on unambiguous contracts and genuine cost advantages, not just technological scale.

marsbit1h ago

$120 Million Vanishes Overnight! Crypto's 'Steadiest Giant' Stumbles in South America

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片