A New Player Enters at Third Place, Rothera Disrupts the Prediction Market Landscape

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-22Last updated on 2026-06-22

Abstract

"Rothera Skyrockets to Third in Prediction Market Rankings, Disrupting Industry Landscape" Rothera, Robinhood's newly launched prediction market platform, has rapidly climbed to become the third-largest player in the sector by trading volume, trailing only giants Kalshi and Polymarket. Its growth is attributed not to attracting new users, but to migrating existing Robinhood user orders away from partner Kalshi. Previously, Robinhood served as a major distribution channel for Kalshi, accounting for an estimated 25%-35% of its volume. With the launch of Rothera, Robinhood now internally executes events like World Cup contracts, capturing revenue that was previously shared with Kalshi. Data shows Rothera's weekly trading volume surged from $21.9 million to $559 million within weeks, reaching nearly one-fifth of Polymarket's volume. Analysts estimate Robinhood's prediction market business could generate around $10 billion in annual revenue at this pace, potentially surpassing its historical crypto revenue peak. In response, Kalshi is reportedly exploring new distribution channels by engaging with investment banks for a potential IPO, requiring them to integrate their systems with Kalshi to access institutional clients. This shift highlights a new competitive focus in prediction markets: controlling user access and distribution channels rather than just product offerings.

By|Azuma(@azuma_eth)

Last week, Odaily Planet Daily published an article titled "The First Prediction Market Stock Appears!", which primarily mentioned that Robinhood is intercepting orders that previously needed to be executed via Kalshi by building its own prediction market, Rothera. This move aims to reduce revenue sharing with Kalshi and retain profits within its own ecosystem.

Although it was anticipated that Rothera would not face the typical cold start problems of other competitors, its data performance over the past week has still far exceeded our previous expectations. After all, it's hard to imagine that a platform, just launched half a month ago, could directly parachute into third place in the highly competitive prediction market track, trailing only the two giants, Kalshi and Polymarket.

Data from Artemis shows that for the week ending June 8th, as a new platform, Rothera's weekly trading volume was only $21.9 million, still showing a significant gap compared to second-tier platforms like Opinion, Predict, and Limitless. However, for the week ending June 15th, Rothera's weekly trading volume directly jumped to industry third place, reaching $276 million. In the latest week ending June 22nd, Rothera's weekly trading volume has increased to $559 million, almost one-fifth of Polymarket's.

Atypical Growth Case (Can skip if you've read the previous article)

It's important to clarify that Rothera's rise is essentially not due to creating incremental users (though some users may have entered due to the World Cup), but rather a migration of existing orders, not the creation of new users.

Over the past year or so, Robinhood has been one of Kalshi's most important distribution channels. Leveraging tens of millions of retail users and mature access to stock, options, and cryptocurrency trading, Robinhood has funneled a large volume of orders to Kalshi. Piper Sandler analysts estimated that trades completed through the Robinhood channel accounted for about 25%-35% of Kalshi's total trading volume.

The problem is that while these orders came from Robinhood users, they didn't belong to Robinhood itself. Under the previous cooperation model, Robinhood acted more like a front-end traffic portal, while Kalshi was the true infrastructure provider responsible for matching, clearing, and settlement. Revenue generated from each transaction needed to be shared between the two parties.

Rothera is the weapon Robinhood is using to break this profit-sharing model. Since early this month, Robinhood has begun migrating some World Cup-related event contracts to be executed internally on Rothera. This means a large volume of orders that might have previously gone to Kalshi are now retained within Robinhood's own system.

Therefore, in a sense, the surge in Rothera's trading volume is less of a threat to other prediction markets like Polymarket, Predict, or Limitless, and more akin to directly "draining blood" from Kalshi.

Robinhood's Value Capture

The rapid growth of Rothera most directly strengthens Robinhood's ability to capture value from prediction market-related orders on this platform.

Hood House, an investment research media outlet long tracking Robinhood, combined public data to state that as of June 20th, Robinhood's prediction market business traded a total of 34,700 contracts daily, corresponding to daily revenue of approximately $4.9 million.

Hood House then disclosed its calculation logic:

  • Rothera (primarily hosting World Cup-related markets) daily trading volume had reached 137 million contracts, corresponding to a trading value of approximately $47 million;
  • For comparison, Kalshi's total daily trading volume was about 1.5 billion contracts, corresponding to a trading value of about $416 million; excluding World Cup-related markets, Kalshi's trading volume was about 1 billion contracts, corresponding to a trading value of about $260 million;
  • Considering that Robinhood users still contribute about 20% (a conservative estimate) of Kalshi's non-World Cup market trading volume, this means that about 210 million contracts and $52 million in trading value from Kalshi's non-World Cup related event contracts were completed via Robinhood.

Hood House further made an aggressive estimate based on this, stating that if this growth rate continues, Robinhood's prediction market business has the opportunity to achieve revenue on the scale of billions of dollars this year. This figure even surpasses the historical peak of Robinhood's cryptocurrency-related revenue, which was approximately $900 million achieved in 2025.

Kalshi's Countermeasure: Finding New Channels

Faced with Rothera's rapid rise, Kalshi is clearly aware of the problem.

For Kalshi, Robinhood was both a partner and one of the most important traffic sources in the past. However, as Robinhood begins migrating more and more orders to its own platform, the relationship between the two has become one of direct competition.

A recent piece of news disclosed by The Information may reveal Kalshi's response strategy. Informed sources revealed that Kalshi has begun early, informal discussions with several investment banks regarding a potential future IPO. More notably, Kalshi has presented a clear requirement in its communications with these banks — to be considered for underwriting qualifications in the future IPO, these institutions need to prioritize completing technical integration of their systems with Kalshi. This would allow their institutional clients to directly participate in trading event contracts on the Kalshi platform.

In other words, Kalshi is leveraging the IPO opportunity to find new distribution channels, integrating prediction markets into the client networks of banks, brokerages, and other financial institutions. This also represents a subtle change occurring in the competitive landscape of the prediction market industry. In the past, the focus was on who could offer more contracts or design better products. Now, as prediction markets gradually move into the mainstream financial system, the competitive focus is shifting to another dimension — whoever controls the user access points can more effectively control value.

The rise of Rothera has already demonstrated the significance of distribution capability. Parachuting into third place in the track seems effortless. Challenging Kalshi and Polymarket in the future may not seem like an impossible task either.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for the rapid rise of Robinhood's prediction market platform Rothera according to the article?

AThe main reason is the migration of existing orders, not the creation of new users. Robinhood, previously a key distribution channel for Kalshi, began directing orders related to events like the World Cup to its own platform Rothera instead of Kalshi, capturing more value internally.

QHow does Rothera's weekly trading volume compare to that of the industry leader Polymarket as of the latest data mentioned?

AAs of the week ending June 22, Rothera's weekly trading volume reached $5.59 billion, which is nearly one-fifth (or approximately 20%) of Polymarket's volume.

QWhat is Kalshi's reported strategy for responding to the competition from Rothera?

AKalshi is reportedly exploring new distribution channels by discussing a potential future IPO with investment banks. A key requirement is that banks seeking underwriting roles must integrate their systems with Kalshi to allow their institutional clients direct access to trade event contracts on Kalshi's platform.

QWhat major shift in the prediction market competition is highlighted as a result of Rothera's growth?

AThe focus of competition is shifting from merely providing more contracts or better products to controlling user access points. The article states that 'whoever can control the user entry point can more effectively control the value.'

QWhat was the estimated daily revenue for Robinhood's prediction market business as of June 20, according to the Hood House analysis cited?

AAccording to Hood House's analysis based on public data, Robinhood's prediction market business generated an estimated daily revenue of approximately $4.9 million on June 20.

Related Reads

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

On June 22nd, driven by rising stock prices, SK Hynix’s market capitalization reached $1.35 trillion, surpassing Bitcoin's total market cap of approximately $1.29 trillion. This temporarily made it South Korea's highest-valued company. The core driver of this surge is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), for which SK Hynix is the primary supplier to NVIDIA, holding over 60% market share. AI's demand for high memory bandwidth has translated into immense profitability, with SK Hynix reporting a 72% operating profit margin in Q1. The company's success follows a 13-year bet on HBM technology, beginning in 2009. It nearly failed after the 2001 dot-com bubble, was acquired by SK Group in 2012, and was subsequently recapitalized to continue its long-term HBM development. The article contrasts this with the Crypto AI narrative. Capital currently favors AI infrastructure players like SK Hynix due to "real orders, physical barriers, and quantifiable profit margins." In comparison, Crypto AI projects, promising decentralized compute and data markets, remain largely conceptual with limited tangible progress. Examples include Bittensor, whose core mechanisms are still under development, and Bitcoin miners transitioning to AI, who face significant funding gaps and execution challenges. The piece cites analysis suggesting the AI sector has absorbed nearly all new market liquidity since 2022, leaving little for crypto. It concludes that the current AI infrastructure红利 is captured by entities with proven technical barriers and supply capabilities, while crypto networks still need to define their concrete role in the value chain.

链捕手29m ago

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

链捕手29m ago

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

Bittensor, a decentralized AI protocol, is accelerating its transition to full decentralization over the next 18 months, as outlined in a recent post by co-founder Const. The project currently operates in a "semi-decentralized" state: ownership and network participation are open and permissionless, with TAO distribution based on competitive contribution. However, protocol upgrades and governance have remained under core team control to enable rapid iteration in the fast-evolving AI sector. This strategic shift comes as the ecosystem matures, boasting 128 subnets and a large community. Const argues that continued centralization now poses risks, including single points of failure and regulatory scrutiny. The upcoming decentralization roadmap includes optimizing validator competition, opening liquidity pools, introducing governance rights for Alpha holders, and refining economic models. The move could fundamentally reshape TAO's value proposition, adding governance premiums to its existing valuation based on AI narrative and scarcity. It also signals a potential maturation of the AI crypto sector, where competition may shift from hype to sustainable protocol design and real economic activity. Bittensor positions itself not just as another AI token, but as foundational infrastructure aiming to decentralize intelligence production—analogous to Bitcoin's role in decentralizing money—with the goal of creating a resilient "Millennium Intelligence Federation."

marsbit42m ago

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

marsbit42m ago

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

In June 2026, Sakana AI's new model Fugu caused a stir in the AI community. Its Fugu Ultra variant achieved scores of 73.7 on SWE-Bench Pro and 82.1 on TerminalBench 2.1, surpassing GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8, and was claimed to be comparable to export-restricted models like Fable 5 and Mythos Preview. Remarkably, the core of this high-performance system is not a massive model, but a small 7B-parameter RL Conductor model. Fugu operates as a multi-agent orchestrator: the 7B model acts as a "foreman," dynamically analyzing user tasks and delegating subtasks to a pool of top-tier global models (e.g., GPT-5, Gemini 3.1 Pro). It then synthesizes and verifies their outputs. This architecture represents a paradigm shift from monolithic models to an expert-team approach. It enhances performance in complex, multi-step engineering tasks like code review and security testing by enabling cross-validation from specialized models, improving long-session stability and token efficiency. However, Fugu's strengths come with trade-offs: it faces inherent latency due to multiple API calls, relies heavily on underlying US model APIs (creating dependency risks), and its benchmark comparisons with Fable/Mythos are based on reported scores, not head-to-head testing. For Japan's AI ecosystem, which lacks the massive compute and data resources of the US or China, Fugu exemplifies an "asymmetric breakthrough" strategy. Instead of competing directly in parameter scale, it focuses on intelligent orchestration of existing global models, offering a degree of AI sovereignty and resilience. While a significant system-level innovation, its ultimate capability is still bounded by the underlying models it coordinates.

marsbit42m ago

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片